Social Networks We Use


CT Tech Junkie Feed

Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 2:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »
Social Enterprise Trust Honors Entrepreneurs Who Hope to Change the World
Oct 28, 2014 11:51 pm
Entrepreneurs interested in making social changes across the world as well as growing their bottom line are an...more »

Our Partners


15 Connecticut Cab Companies Sue Uber, Lyft

by Middletown Press | May 22, 2014 5:30am
(3) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Courts, Transportation

Peter Casolino-New Haven Register

Richie Cassella, manager of driver services at Metro Taxi, fills one of the wheelchair accessible taxis at the natural gas filling stations at fleet headquarters in West Haven.

A coalition of 15 Connecticut cab and livery companies filed suit in federal court Wednesday to block ride sharing companies Uber and Lyft from doing business in the state.

The cab and livery companies, who are being represented by Hartford attorney Mary Alice Moore Leonhardt, filed a 42-page complaint in U.S. District Court that contends because Uber and Lyft are Internet-based, they are putting passenger safety at risk by skirting state and federal regulations that govern the industry. Uber and Lyft arrived in parts of Connecticut, including New Haven, in April.The case has been assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Alvin Thompson in Hartford, Leonhardt said.

“We wanted to get this before the court as soon as possible,” she said. “ It’s possible that other companies around the state may join the case at a later date.”

Click here to continue reading Luther Turmelle’s report.

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(3) Comments

posted by: Diogenese | May 22, 2014  5:44am

Rent seekers using the government to prevent competition. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before…

posted by: art vandelay | May 22, 2014  6:08am

art vandelay

The taxi & livery business is very closed & very protective of outside competition. It’s their sandbox and they don’t want anyone else playing in it. Same thing is happening w/Tesla trying to sell cars in Connecticut.  The world is changing.  These companies better start learning to adapt. Competition is always good & healthy for any company or institution.

posted by: JamesBronsdon | May 22, 2014  1:45pm

Diogenese, you beat me to it. Regardless of whether there may have been good intent at the time behind the hundreds of statutory constructs intended to protect consumers, the regulated having consolidated their positions now milk them for all they are worth. And who can blame them? And who can blame their support for the politicians and regulators, who in turn benefit from the whole corrupt system?