Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Windows Laptops Now Under $200
Nov 1, 2014 11:00 pm
Microsoft, reacting to pressure from low-cost Chromebooks, now has its own low cost but fully functional laptop PCs...more »
Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 1:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »

Our Partners

˜

Advocates Lobby For Aid In Dying Legislation

by Hugh McQuaid | Jan 29, 2014 2:24pm
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Health Care

Hugh McQuaid Photo

Portraits will hang in the Capitol concourse

Portraits of “aid-in-dying” supporters will be displayed in the State Capitol for two weeks beginning Friday as part of this year’s push for legislation to allow terminally ill patients to legally end their lives.

Advocates of the proposal announced the new campaign to legalize the practice at a Wednesday morning press conference in the Legislative Office Building.

The photos will hang along the State Capitol concourse from Jan. 31 to Feb. 14 and feature advocates seeking legislation to permit terminally ill patients in Connecticut to end their lives with the help of a doctor. Each picture also will include a quote like “Quality of life includes peaceful death.”

Permitting a doctor to prescribe drugs to end the life of a terminally ill and mentally competent patient is legal in only a handful of states. Vermont, Oregon, Washington, and Montana all have laws permitting the practice. A court decision from earlier this month could make New Mexico the fifth state in which it is legal.

A group called Compassion and Choices Connecticut is hoping build on an effort that began in this state last year and see a bill raised during the legislative session that begins next week.

Rep. Betsy Ritter, D-Waterford, and other lawmakers raised similar proposals last year which resulted in the first public hearing on the topic before Connecticut’s legislature. The hearing was widely attended and drew testimony from residents both for and against the law.

Ultimately the bill was never passed out of the Public Health Committee. Ritter said she’s urged the committee’s leadership to raise the bill again this year but that decision has yet to be made. Ritter and other supporters said it will take time for lawmakers to consider the issue.

“For a lot of people death is a very difficult subject,” Rep. Phil Miller, D-Ivoryton, said Wednesday. “But I hope as we begin an objective discussion about this, we can view death as part of the life experience.”

Hugh McQuaid Photo Advocates frame the issue in terms of personal choice and dignity. Sara Myers, a Kent resident who suffers from Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, said she has considered moving to a country or state where the practice is legal but does not want to leave her home.

“If you know what this disease is, you know I don’t have an easy time ahead of me . . . all of the muscles in my body are dying,” Myers said. “. . . I still think I wish I had the choice to have help when enough is enough to end my suffering.”

But proposals here have drawn opposition from a wide variety of organizations ranging from the Connecticut State Medical Society to Connecticut Catholic Public Affairs Conference. Disability advocates also fought last year’s legislation.

Peter Wolfgang, executive director of a social conservative group called the Family Institute of Connecticut, called the proposal a “fringe effort by a small group.”

Hugh McQuaid Photo “We have a lot of allies in opposition to assisted suicide who disagree with us on everything else under the sun. But there are both conservatives and progressives that oppose assisted suicide because it’s bad public policy,” he said Wednesday.

Wolfgang said last year’s bill was “soundly defeated” because it lacked the support to pass the legislature.

Sen. John Kissel, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, issued a statement following Wednesday’s press conference opposing the proposal. He said he was concerned about the impact such a law could have on the elderly and disabled.

“This legislation represents a slippery slope for those who can’t advocate well for themselves.  I am worried that this law, if passed, would open the door for undue influence of the elderly and disabled by allowing those around them to influence their decision to commit suicide for their own gain,” Kissel said.

Supporters are hoping that some lawmakers have shifted their opinion of the legislation. They cited a poll commissioned by Compassion and Choices Connecticut before last year’s legislative session that suggested a majority of those surveyed in Connecticut supported an aid-in-dying law.

Even if supporters succeeded in passing the legislation, it is unclear whether Gov. Dannel P. Malloy would support it. Asked last year about the bill, Malloy called it “a very complex and difficult issue” and said he was undecided.

“It’s an issue that’s fraught with fears, represents taboos both religious and societal. It also raises very substantial questions about the ability of one to control their own destiny,” he said.

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(5) Comments

posted by: art vandelay | January 29, 2014  3:28pm

art vandelay

If memory serves me correct, didn’t Dr. Kevorkian go to jail for assisted suicides?  How times have changed over the past few years.

posted by: BETTY | January 29, 2014  7:58pm

The purpose of the Aid in Dying legislation is to support the terminally ill person’s right to self determination. The legislation is not looking to impose this right on anyone who does not want it- only to support those person’s who do.

As a home care and hospice nurse for over thirty years experience I have been asked by some patients to help them end their life—something I am unable to do. SInce I know that there are terminally ill people who despite all the best hospice care may still experience an undignified uncomfortable death I believe that we need to pass Aid in Dying legislation to support personal choice. Thank you.

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | January 29, 2014  9:35pm

DrHunterSThompson

i’d like to see “live forever” legislation.

HST

posted by: tao4mind | January 30, 2014  5:41am

My father was murdered in Oregon with this “death with dignity” scam. His fifth wife and her gay lawyer brother used financial costs of cancer to convince him to agree to doctor assisted suicide. His home, stocks, bonds would all go to his children from his first wife. This group called Compassion and Choices gave them a list of doctors who were pro-assisted suicide in Oregon because you need two signatures from physicians on paperwork. After traveling the entire state (over 20 doctors) looking for that second signature without success due to the fact that my father wasn’t what those doctors felt met the requirements, finally the lawyer brother was able to push the paperwork threw the system anyway. First “suicide party” with friends who wanted to watch the assisted suicide did not go well, was told he was fighting and refused to take the drugs and caseworker left. Second “suicide party” fifth wife and lawyer brother with a couple friends got him drunk on brandy and put medication in his drinks. His home, stocks, bonds would all go to his children from his first wife. Not true; even though there is a trust made out by the brother lawyer all executive power is his sister and him. Everything sold and up for sale; just like child support the four kids never received a dime. This doctor assisted suicide is justification for legal murder. Father was diagnosed with esophageal cancer but had no problem walking two miles on the beach where he lived when us four kids went to visit 30 days before his execution under Oregon’s law.

posted by: Leslie Wolfgang | January 30, 2014  8:36am

tao4mind - I’m very sorry for your loss.  Please consider reaching out to The Patients Rights Council to share your story.  Activists who support assisted suicide insist there has NEVER been a case of abuse.  Consider also the case of Tami Sawyer of Oregon who pleaded guilty to stealing $50k from a man who died by assisted suicide under her care.  There are many others, and with a state so full of wealthy seniors, I think CT legislators would be putting so many at risk . . it would be better to continue to resist this legislation and focus on increased access to better palliative care.