Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

ANALYSIS | Shays’ Last Rebellion

by Christine Stuart | Jul 19, 2012 5:30am
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Congress, Election 2012, Media Matters

Christine Stuart photo

Chris Shays

Near the entrance to the NBC studios in West Hartford, former U.S. Rep. Chris Shays told reporters he will continue to attack Linda McMahon and the business she built even if it costs him the election.

The two are vying in an Aug. 14 primary for the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Joe Lieberman. The two candidates took turns facing reporters after the debate.

To hear Shays describe the debate and the race was to listen to an old-school politician trying to make peace with the cold realities of a new political era. An era in which the rules have changed about where money comes from in campaigns, or who has to answer questions from whom.

“The point is I’m not going to be silent about that anymore than I would be silent about [U.S. Senate Majority Leader] Harry Reid not bringing out a budget,” Shays told reporters. “ I’ve got the guts to confront her even if it means I don’t win this election.”

Before the press scrum even started Shays admitted it may be the last time he would be in the center of a group of reporters pointing microphones in his direction..

“It may be the last time, and I think that would be a loss for the state,” Shays told reporters.


Shays, who served in Congress for 21 years before he was defeated by U.S. Rep. Jim Himes in 2008, decried how the rules of politics have changed in ways that allow candidates to bypass editorial boards and the media in general. He was referring to McMahon’s decision not to meet with editorial boards prior to the primary.

Shays asked the media to look at his economic plan and compare it to Linda McMahon’s economic plan.

“If she eliminates write-offs then why did she leave the tax rate at 35 and at 33 and at 38?” Shays said.

A reporter pointed out that voters would not be doing a side-by-side comparison of their economic plans as Shays suggested.

“Oh, geez, don’t say that to me,” Shays said with a hand over his heart.

But Shays seems to have been around politics long enough to know the odds are stacked against him. The latest polls show McMahon 29 points ahead of him and he doesn’t have enough money left in his campaign coffers to produce and run television ads.

“In the end, the polls have her ahead of me and I believe folks will want to vote for me,” he said. “I believe her support is paper thin.”

Unlike former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons, who challenged McMahon in 2010, Shays decided to stay and fight in the primary even though he didn’t receive the party’s endorsement at the Republican convention in May. Prior to the 2010 primary Simmons’ main line of attack revolved around how McMahon made her millions—building a professional wrestling organization.

Shays said McMahon can’t talk about job creation without talking about her job.

“Forty-one people died before the age of 50,” Shays said about the wrestlers, who are independent contractors, and not employees, according to the WWE.

“Her record was running the WWE when Vince McMahon her husband pulls down his pants and makes someone kiss it. Has somebody literally strip in front of adults and kids,” Shays said. “That stuns me.”

McMahon deflected Shays’ attacks of the WWE several times during the hour-long debate.

McMahon said Shays always gets caught up in the “Hollywood scripting” of the WWE.

“What we don’t have enough of in Washington are business people,” McMahon said.

Christine Stuart photo

Linda McMahon

Facing the reality that things have changed, Shays said he never declined to debate his opponent because “that’s the process and I honor it and I respect it.”

Shays was also stunned with McMahon’s decision not to meet with editorial boards. He said when former three-term U.S. Rep. Gary Franks did that back in the 1990s “he got chopped into little pieces.” (Franks did win those elections.)

But newspaper editorial boards have become less influential because the Internet has given a printing press to the masses. McMahon, who has contributed about $8 million of her own money to her campaign this year, has been able to purchase television commercials, advertisements, and other media to get her message across.

Shays said he’s not asking anyone to ignore the reality that McMahon can buy lots of advertisements. He’s just asking voters to see through it, he said.

“What I’m telling voters to do is don’t drink her Kool-Aid,” Shays said.

For her part, McMahon said voters care about jobs and the economy. McMahon stuck firmly to her talking points in the post-debate spin zone, declining to release her 2010 tax returns as a substitute for her unfinished 2011 taxes. Pushed on whether her taxes would include any off-shore tax havens, McMahon said she knows that answer and will release her tax return as soon as it’s done.

Pressed further, McMahon said, “we keep our money here in this country.”

As a largely self-financed candidate, McMahon painted herself as someone who will be responsible only to the voters of the state.

“I have not taken any PAC money or special interest money,” McMahon told reporters. “I am simply there to do a job. I’m not looking for a career. I’m not looking for fame or fortune. I’m running for the United States Senate because I believe I can make a difference and want an opportunity to do that.”

Reporters asked why she won’t agree to sell that point at more debates.

“We’ve had plenty of debates. I think we’ve had five forums and two debates,” McMahon said. “I’m out everyday talking to the people of Connecticut.”

Because she’s largely self-funding her own campaign, McMahon has the luxury of going out on the campaign trail every day and talking to voters.

It’s a luxury, her likely Democratic opponent, U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy, doesn’t have. Murphy, who spent most of his time representing the 5th Congressional District, said he didn’t really dedicate as much time in the early stages of the campaign to raising money because he was focused on doing his job. But with the election on the horizon Murphy said he’s switched gears and is spending about five hours on the phone every day making fundraising calls to make sure he’s competitive in November.

As McMahon’s spokesman Tim Murtaugh was cutting off the press conference, a reporter asked “do you need reporters anymore?”

McMahon didn’t answer. She just smiled as she turned and headed into the elevator.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(5) Comments

posted by: Noteworthy | July 19, 2012  9:53am

Never fear - the 4th Estate is alive and well and the sky is not falling.

Candidates need reporters but they don’t need editorial boards of newspapers. These newspapers and their columnists who scream so loud are the same ones who never endorse a challenger - ever.

This is an excellent analysis of this race. I would add that Shays’ claim to experience is interesting, but the problem is his experience is not what we need nor are we interested in it. Shays and Lieberman brought us a trillion dollar war with no good and clear outcome. As for jobs and economic vitality that we so desperately need in Connecticut - Shays had 21 years to get that done. This state has not seen job growth in more than a generation.

We need fresh eyes on old problems. Bottom line. If we don’t, we will get exactly what we have already have and that’s unacceptable.

posted by: RE-Windsor, CT | July 19, 2012  10:28am

We need to discuss the issues that effect all of us.  We also need to discuss and teach voters what issues are Federal vs State cs Local.

I think her comments on education are moving in the correct direction.  I believe education should be managed on the State level and more so the Local level.

I believe parents should be given the responsibility and opportunity to pick the best schools for their children. 

I believe parents, when given an opportunity and a chance, will do right by their children.

posted by: Palin Smith | July 19, 2012  12:11pm

Linda McMahon knows the history of across the board tax cuts. She knows that whenever they are implemented, the economy rebounds and tax revenues surge, helping to better fund the government.

If she remembers why can’t Democrats? Democrats are not interested in accessing more money to spend, they are only too eager to punish success. Too many successful people are a danger to the Democrats’ ultimate goal of transforming America into another failed socialist state. Successful people THINK for themselves and are abhorent to the progressives’ domination of education processes.

Linda McMahon is proud of America’s success! She will well represent that ideal for all the voters when she is sent ot Congress. She’s got to get there first, however. Every Connecticut voter should think about his or her future before casting a vote on Election Day.

A vote for McMahon will enable more people to lift themselves up. A vote for her Democrat opponent is an admission that you are comfortable as part of the herd.

posted by: RE-Windsor, CT | July 19, 2012  2:18pm

@Palin Smith, You might get a smile in knowing you are correct.  We have a Dem. candidate for the 5th district who has said he “dreams about paying more in property taxes” in Windsor and that was said May 2012 in a letter on Patch.

I have said that tax revenue to politicans on both sides, moreso the Dem. side, is like crack to a crack addict.  Give them a little and they want more and more till they kill themselves… or US.

posted by: 17beachboy | July 19, 2012  2:20pm

“Her record was running the WWE when Vince McMahon her husband pulls down his pants and makes someone kiss it. Has somebody literally strip in front of adults and kids,” Shays said. “That stuns me.”

No parent was required to bring their child to a WWE event.  A responsible parent investigates the content of the entertainment their child will be viewing.  Don’t blame the McMahon family for supplying what people wanted - and paid for to see.  Like it or not - she made her money legally - unlike many politicians (i.e. the Kennedy’s and their bootlegging ways of the 1920’s and 30’s).

Is she trying to buy an election?  Well, no really.  She is using a ton of her money to get elected, but buy votes?  That’s a bit of a stretch.  Better she use her own money than taxpayer dollars, union dues and convoluted donations.

Washington DC is a mess and we keep sending career politicians there to try and clean up what career politicians messed up.  She has no political experience - but show me someone with political experience in either party that has truly improved our country.