Social Networks We Use


CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners


Campaigns Spin Ryan Visit

by Hugh McQuaid | Sep 28, 2012 3:48pm
(10) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Congress, Election 2012

Republican Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan will be in Connecticut for three fundraising events on Sunday, but his presence in the state may be doing more to help Democrats than GOP candidates.

Neither Republican U.S. Sen. candidate Linda McMahon, nor 5th District GOP candidate Andrew Roraback will be attending any of the Sunday fundraisers. Campaign spokesmen for both candidates cited scheduling conflicts.

But it didn’t stop their Democratic opponents from holding a conference call with reporters Friday in an attempt to draw comparisons between the state Republican candidates and the Wisconsin Rep., whose conservative budget proposal has become a target for Democrats.

“On the eve of the Republican vice presidential nominee’s visit to Connecticut, we need to really highlight the contrast of the Republican candidates’ plan to dismantle Social Security as we know it, in contrast to Democrats’ efforts to preserve it, to protect it,” State Democratic Party Executive Director Jonathan Harris told reporters.

The Ryan visit gave Democrats in both races an opportunity to further the narratives their campaigns have been pushing lately. For McMahon’s opponent, U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy, it was McMahon’s recently publicized comments on entitlement programs.

On Thursday, the Murphy camp began citing a Huffington Post article that quotes McMahon telling a group of Tea Party supporters that she would consider a proposal to “sunset” Social Security. His campaign later cited a WFSB report, which claimed McMahon would also be willing to consider privatizing Medicare, perhaps with a voucher program similar to one Ryan has proposed.

During the conference call, Murphy said Ryan was coming to Connecticut with a clear message to seniors.

“President Romney and Vice President Ryan would fix Medicare on the back’s of Connecticut seniors. The Romney/Ryan/McMahon Medicare privatization plan would result in seniors paying $6,000 more a year out of their pocket for Medicare,” Murphy said.

In response, the McMahon campaign points to an August AARP voter guide published in the Hartford Courant, which states that McMahon believes both programs need to be strengthened through a bipartisan effort, and would oppose any effort to privatize them.

“It’s sad that Congressman Murphy continues to misrepresent Linda McMahon’s position on Social Security and Medicare,” Todd Abrajano, McMahon‘s spokesman, said. “He’s clearly trying to distract voters from his own horrible record.”

Abrajano goes on to cite Murphy’s support of the Affordable Care Act — which reduces Medicare payments to health insurance companies and care providers by $716 billion over 10 years — and said Murphy has proposed to increase taxes to fund Social Security.

Meanwhile, former Democratic state Rep. Elizabeth Esty used the conference call to continue her efforts to tie Roraback, her opponent, to national Tea Party Republicans.

“[Roraback] would be a vote for [House Speaker] John Boehner and the Tea Party agenda, whose priorities and policies are wrong for Connecticut values. The Tea Party needs Andrew Roraback’s vote,” Esty said Friday. 

Esty also questioned Roraback’s positions on entitlement programs.

“Rather than defending Social Security benefits, earned through a lifetime of hard work, my opponent has put raising the retirement age, cutting cost-of-living adjustments, and is even open to privatization for people currently under 50,” she said.

Chris Cooper, Roraback’s spokesman, said Esty was putting words in Roraback’s mouth and parroting the “hyper-partisan” tactics of national Democrats. He said Roraback has stated on the record that he supports an increase in the cost-of-living adjustment, not a cut, and is steadfastly opposed to privatizing Social Security.

“Esty also continues to stoop to the shameful tactic of scaring senior citizens to help her political campaign by distorting Andrew’s record. That kind of insensitivity is not surprising, coming from a person who told senior citizens in her hometown that if they couldn’t afford their taxes, they should ‘move out of town,’” Cooper said, referring to remarks Esty made 10 years ago.

Efforts to liken Roraback to Tea Party Republicans may become more difficult to support, considering the reaction of one Tea Party activist after Roraback demanded TV stations stop running an ad funded by national Democrats comparing him to Tea Party figures.

In an email, Bob MacGuffie of Right Principles accused Roraback of “walking out on” Tea Party supporters.

“Message to Andy Roraback: your action doesn’t just distance yourself from the Tea Party or the Ryan budget — you’ve just disparaged and walked away from your Party’s base!” MacGuffie wrote.

But for Harris, it isn’t about Roraback’s moderation as a state senator, because moderate Republicans are all but an extinct species in Washington, he said.

“That type of Republican has gone the way of the Dodo,” Harris said. “I don’t see how anyone in their right mind, especially someone who knows how legislative bodies work, can expect them to go down there and be independent voices.”

Given that national Republicans have made preventing a second Obama term their top priority, Harris said, it’s especially important that Democrats maintain control of the Senate and take back the House.

Here in Connecticut, Paul Ryan’s visit provides Democrats the opportunity to highlight the distinctions between the two parties, Harris said.

“I think [the Ryan visit] is helpful for Democrats because it illustrates the clear differences between the two parties but more importantly the Democratic and Republican candidates,” he said.

As for the conspicuous absence of both McMahon and Roraback at the Ryan events, Harris figures it’s about more than tight campaign schedules.

“They’re trying to distance themselves from an agenda they know is opposed by most people in Connecticut,” he said.

State Republican Chairman Jerry Labriola Jr. sees it differently, saying more of Connecticut’s unaffiliated voters are beginning to lean Republican as Connecticut ranks near the bottom of most national economic indicators.

He said scheduling conflicts seem like a perfectly valid reason to skip a fundraiser, given that it’s almost October.

“I’m not surprised about some scheduling conflicts. It’s a busy time in the campaign season and our hard-working Republican candidates are crisscrossing the state connecting with voters,” he said.

Asked whether McMahon would have liked to attend the Ryan events if her schedule were more open, Abrajano said McMahon would likely find some other event where she would have the opportunity to talk with voters and get her message out there.

He said that when it comes to choosing which events to attend, it’s a question of which event would be most beneficial to the campaign and getting McMahon elected.

Vincent Moscardelli, a political science professor at the University of Connecticut, said it’s not surprising that the Democrats would try to use Ryan’s presence to link state candidates with the national GOP, just as it’s not surprising the Republicans would distance themselves from it.

From the beginning of the campaigns, Democrats have sought to make the race about the contrasts of the two parties, whereas Republicans have wanted to focus the races on individuals.

“The Democrats have been trying to link Roraback and McMahon to this guy long before he came to Connecticut and they will keep trying long after he leaves,” Moscardelli said.

Connect with Hugh:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(10) Comments

posted by: wmwallace | September 28, 2012  6:04pm

They can attack Ryan all they want, but they are avoiding the real issues of the economy and unemployment that many are dealing with in Connecticut.  Let the democrats rail on personal attacks and the republicans can stay on point talking about the issue that concern the voters.

posted by: shinningstars122 | September 29, 2012  10:42am


Wmwallace I guess you never saw any of the SuperPac attack ads against all the GOP Presidential candiates during the primaries that gasp!!! were paid by GOP SuperPacs.
It nice that Ryan only comes to CT to beg for money from the 1% and Roraback and McMahon want nothing to do with him. Luckily the majority of CT voters feel the same.

posted by: Lawrence | September 29, 2012  10:54am

William, so glad you are back! How did that “non-news story” CTNJ ran about Len Suzio ever work out? Seems like the Meriden Record-Journal had a monster front page last Sunday on the same issue with all kinds of “non-news story” facts and background information about his sad business legacy in Great Barrington.
Maybe your criticism was totally unwarranted after all!


R-Money and Ryan make McCain-Palin look like a campaign juggernaut. Let Paul come in and raise some money, it will make no difference. Only later will GOP realize—“Wow, Mitt did to us what he did to so many American workers for years—he took our money and ran.”

Or, in the words of Mitt Romney, he and Ryan are in the “business” of “investing” in a political campaign for several months and then “harvesting” GOP cash.

GOP cash that goes to corrupt, discredited, anti-American GOP operatives like Nate Sproul?

Keep it coming, GOP—you CANNOT make this stuff up!

posted by: MGKW | September 29, 2012  1:57pm

Personal attacks? The Romney-Ryan campaign is imploding as we speak…this could be the worst run campaign in the history of American politics…and don’t take may word for it—-I am just on of those biased liberals….listen to your fellow Republicans who are saying it….both of them do not have a clue….and the poles bear it out…Oh I forgot all the polls are biased too….

posted by: Lawrence | September 29, 2012  7:22pm

Opinion: Ryan has been worse for Romney than his “47%” comment:

posted by: LongJohn47 | September 29, 2012  9:29pm

wmwallace is right.  let’s stay on the issues of concern to voters.
  - criminalizing abortions
  - converting medicare to a voucher program
  - tax cuts for the rich, program cutbacks for the poor
  - faith-based economics

I’m so happy Ryan is running!

posted by: Pjcctyh | September 30, 2012  6:48pm

Linda is a ‘republican’ because in CT that party is so lame that if she can pay her own way that’s enough for them.
She’s on the ballot now so she wants to gets as far away from their platform as she can…she has nothing to offer except she really wants to be a senator and can spend whatever it takes to do that

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | September 30, 2012  7:31pm

Diggin LongJohn’s sense of humor!


posted by: SalRomano | October 1, 2012  2:02pm

Chris Murphy “was very careless the truth” when he said a Republican privitation plan would result in $6,000 more out of their packets for Medicare.

posted by: wmwallace | October 1, 2012  3:05pm

Because this economy is just bustling under Obama and Malloy.

Malloy talking about not raising taxes but couldn’t rule out the possibility. That is a man of convection huh.

President Obama has already stating raising taxes while the economy is sputtering at best.

I am still wonder what Dante Bartolomeo plans on doing since she voted for raising taxes in Meriden. My guess is she will do more of the same at the state level.

The report on Senator Suzio was slanted at best by this publication and the Meriden Record Journal who is in the bag for any democrat like this blog is. 

Funny how this wasn’t an issue before Mrs. Bartolomeo ran for office. what a surprise.