Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

NASA’s Orion Spacecraft Completes Successful Unmanned First Mission
Dec 5, 2014 11:30 am
An unmanned test flight of NASA’s new Orion spacecraft was successful this morning, flying higher than any human-rated...more »
2014 Connecticut International Auto Show to Feature Electric Vehicles And More
Nov 20, 2014 9:00 am
State automobile retailers are hoping to educate consumers about the benefits of electric vehicles at the Connecticut...more »

Our Partners

˜

Candidate Remains Focused As Former Business Fights Media

by Hugh McQuaid | May 31, 2012 4:30am
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2012

Hugh McQuaid Photo

Linda McMahon with business owner Alexandria Litor

While the WWE may be engaged in a high profile smackdown with some of the state’s media outlets, its former CEO Linda McMahon won’t be distracted from her race for U.S. Senate.

The wrestling corporation has been pushing back against newspaper editorials characterizing its programing as violent pornography. One came from the Manchester Journal Inquirer’s Managing Editor Chris Powell, who last week said McMahon derived her wealth from “the business of violence, pornography, and general raunch.”

The WWE responded by calling for a retraction and threatening to sue Powell for libel. On Wednesday the company issued a statement further clarifying its position and saying unfair characterization of its content jeopardizes the business.

“WWE refuses to be bullied and will not allow our content to be inaccurately categorized. This This is not about politics or Linda McMahon’s (former CEO of WWE) candidacy. This about protecting WWE’s business and setting the record straight that WWE has never been in the business of pornography,” the statement read.

And for her part, McMahon is staying out of the fight. She referred all questions about the issue to the WWE.

“It’s not a distraction for me because I’m really focused on what I’m doing. That’s all the WWE. I’m focused on, like today, this jobs tour. We’re going to tour 20 jobs before the end of the week,” she said.

McMahon acknowledged there was some focus on the content of the WWE’s programming during the last election cycle but said voters are more concerned about jobs and the economy than they are about television programming.

“It was actually a minor part last year, and I really do believe the folks in Connecticut, as I’ve said before, they are focused on their lives, they’re focused on their children,” she said. “You talk to women in the Sandwich generation, not just women, they’ve got kids who aren’t finding jobs and are coming back home to live and at the same time they’re caring for aging parents.”

On Wednesday McMahon continued her jobs tour, meeting with business owners in central Connecticut. Her last stop of the day was La Petite France, a French bakery and coffee shop in West Hartford.

McMahon said she’s been focused on telling people more of her story than voters got during her unsuccessful run for Senate two years ago. For instance a recent television ad stressed her blue collar background. McMahon said both her parents were civil service employees and she grew up in low-income housing.

“We sort of went all the way back into my childhood, which I really didn’t do during my first campaign, not by intentional omission so to speak, I just didn’t know that would be as important for people to know where I came from,” she said.

The message has been resonating with voters and business owners, she said. Since the last campaign, McMahon has also worked hard to improve her image among women voters. On Wednesday she met with Alexandria Litor, who owns La Petite France with her husband.

Litor, who’s French and can’t vote in the upcoming election, said she liked talking with McMahon, though she doesn’t really follow politics. She said the candidate asked her about issues like running a business while raising a family.

“I think she understands. She’s a woman too and she owns a business and she has kids. She went through the same thing,” Litor said.

However, Litor said she couldn’t say whether McMahon would get her vote if she had one to give, mainly because she wasn’t familiar enough with what the candidate stands for.

“When you have a business and a family, it’s always so busy. I don’t take the time to look around,” she said.

The two talked about business challenges and the changes Litor has made to the bakery since the last time McMahon visited. Litor said she’s been promoting the business on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter but the small bakery remains an authentic French establishment.

McMahon said Litor was doing all the right things as a business owner.

“Stick to what you know. I can attest to that,” McMahon told her.

“But you can always reinvent yourself,” Litor responded.

McMahon agreed.

Tags: , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(8) Comments

posted by: Noteworthy | May 31, 2012  6:33am

Good for Linda. As for Chris Powell and the JI being targeted by the WWE for libel - I actually agree the paper should either retract or be sued. You cannot intentionally and maliciously misrepresent what a company does in order to slam somebody for political office. Has the JI also charaterized Hooters for pandering in pornography? How about PETA and their antics? What’s worse is that those inaccurate and damaging characterizations end up in routine stories as well. There is a pattern of CT media rushing to label candidates they don’t favor in unflattering ways. A few years ago it was Ned Lamont who everytime his name came up, was called “millionaire Ned Lamont.” It didn’t matter that Lieberman was also a millionaire.

posted by: Walt | May 31, 2012  10:00am

Seems the WWE has a valid complaint and should sue

Can’t call   it a porno operation without proof that it is so,

Press should be more responsible in its doings. 

\Do not believe it is comparable to   Lamont coverage which was true,not libelous

posted by: ... | May 31, 2012  11:29am

...

It is funny because Chris Powell is a Libertarian who regularly criticizes Democrats more than Republicans, and a host of journalists who have come to his defense all trace their political ideologies from both the left, center, and right.

To think that it is libel to produce an opinion (freedom of speech) as an editor of a newspaper (freedom of the media/press) that you believe scantily clad men and women fighting and engaging in degrading acts is not pornographic (or to use a perfectly equal synonym, vulgar or suggestive) is to go against the ideals of the constitution and the bill of rights.

Or should we return to the Alien and Sedition Acts; where anyone claiming a candidate or elected official was engaging in ‘nepotism and monarchical ambition(s)’ or calling the President a ‘repulsive pedant, a gross hypocrite and an unprincipled oppressor’ would be worthy of arrest, trial, and conviction?

posted by: tin turnip | May 31, 2012  11:43am

Noteworthy, are you suggesting that the WWE DOESN"T makes its money off of violence porn and raunch? Have you seen their programming? The JI isn’t misrepresenting anything about their business. And besides, it was an EDITORIAL, in other words, OPINION. If they back down that’s another blow to our free press.

posted by: Walt | June 1, 2012  4:51am

what porn do they supposedly produce?

posted by: Concerned CT | June 1, 2012  12:03pm

Looks like at least some of the media is not backing down. Interesting.
http://www.darientimes.com/opinion/editorials/5003332-editorial-no-time-for-bullies.html

posted by: Phil Stull | June 2, 2012  4:43pm

I would love the popcorn concession for that trial but you know that WWE does not want to be anywhere near a trial given the evidence.

posted by: SocialButterfly | June 4, 2012  10:47am

Chris Donovan and Linda McMahon are “Birds of a feather” with their connections to pornographic figures. Chris Donovan should resign—because of it.  Donovan hired his federally investigated financial guru—from a pornographic web site.  There is no excuse for his poor judgement—and we don’t need this kind of faulty judgement in Congress—as an addition to our present “congressional loser’s club” led by Chris Murphy—who only follows the the flawed lradership of Pres. Barack Obama, as a “Obama Rubber Stamp.”  We ned new leadership in Congress—people who can think for themselves and “the best for our country!”