CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Bill Clarifying Attorney General Qualifications Advances

by | May 11, 2011 3:02pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Courts, Legal, State Capitol

A measure that would specify that a candidate for attorney general only needs to be a registered attorney for 10 years to become a candidate for attorney general passed the General Administration and Elections Committee Wednesday.

The bill would eliminate the active practice standards of qualifications, requiring the candidate to be a practicing attorney for the 10 years before the election.

The measure was introduced after the state’s Supreme Court found last May that then-secretary of the state and attorney general candidate Susan Bysiewicz was not qualified for the position. Bysiewicz dropped out of the race.

However, the issue was raised again just seven days before the election, when Republican candidate Martha Dean filed a lawsuit claiming Democratic candidate George Jepsen was also unqualified due to lack of litigation experience. A Superior Court judge found Dean did not standing to question Jepsen’s qualifications.

Rep. Matthew Lesser, D-Middletown, said the Supreme Court decision created a lot of questions about whether former attorneys general would have been qualified under the statutes. He said Sen. Joseph Lieberman and other former occupants of the position may not have met the requirements as defined by the decision.

“If you want to hold to the standards the Supreme Court set, it has all sorts of troubling implications. I don’t think that was the intent of the legislature when the statutes were drafted. We’re just trying to clarify that,” he said.

Lesser said Connecticut has the strictest standards for attorney general in the nation and the legislation was aimed at bringing the state more in line with the requirements of other states.

“Even if this law passes, I think we still would have the toughest qualifications in the country. So it’s not as if we are eliminating all our qualifications,” he said.

But Rep. Tony Hwang, R-Fairfield, disagreed. He said the state Supreme Court determined the level experience needed for the position and it was wrong for the General Assembly to try to legislate an interpretation.

He said the bill, as written, also leaves too many unknowns for potential candidates.

“We can’t anticipate all the different circumstances,” he said.

What happens if somebody had been a practicing attorney but has retired and not been practicing, Hwang asked. Under the legislation, it would not be clear whether that person would be eligible to run for attorney general, he said. Under the Supreme Court decision, that person would not be qualified.

As for having the strictest requirements in the country, Hwang said it’s a compliment to the state’s attorneys general, past and present.

“There was never a question on their legal ability to protect the interests of our community. So for me, I was perfectly happy defining that role,” he said.

The measure will now move back to the House.

Tags: ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |


(2) Archived Comments

posted by: OutOfOutrage | May 11, 2011  4:46pm


In a related story, a bill which lowers basketball hoops all over state to 4’6” has passed the GA in hopes of attracting shorter overweight players to the state’s teams.

“This is an issue of fairness, diversity and the idea that million dollar contracts should not be reserved only to those who can run fast or jump high.”  CT deserves basketball teams that reflect the skills and values of it’s citizens”, said the committee chair.

posted by: StarveTheBeast | May 11, 2011  9:11pm

In another related story, Connecticut has the highest taxes in the nation and new legislation should be aimed at bringing our taxes in line with other states. Remember, we actually voted them in. Maybe we should just tax the rich more….

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages