Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 2:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »
Social Enterprise Trust Honors Entrepreneurs Who Hope to Change the World
Oct 28, 2014 11:51 pm
Entrepreneurs interested in making social changes across the world as well as growing their bottom line are an...more »

Our Partners

˜

Connecticut Buys New Haven A Tennis Tourney

by Christine Stuart | Oct 10, 2013 9:17pm
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Business, Town News, New Haven, Sports

Courtesy of the Women's Tennis Association In an effort to make sure the Winston-Salem Open didn’t snag the U.S. women’s tennis tournament away from Connecticut, the state announced plans Thursday to purchase it for $618,000.

The Capital Region Development Authority is expected to approve the purchase of the tennis tournament at its meeting next week, Office of Policy and Management Secretary Ben Barnes said. The money to purchase it from the U.S. Tennis Association will come from the Manufacturing Assistance Act, which is funded with loans repaid to the state.

Barnes called $618,000 a “bargain in the world of owning tennis tournaments.” The state also invests about $400,000 in the tournament bringing its total investment over the next two years to about $1.4 million.

The New Haven Open at Yale lost its title sponsor — Pilot Pen — in 2010 along with the men’s tournament, which moved to Winston-Salem. Since then a group of corporate sponsors have helped keep the tournament alive.

Anne Worcester, who will remain tournament director, said they have received commitments from four of their five cornerstone sponsors. American Express, First Niagara, Yale, and Yale-New Haven Hospital already have signed on for another three years. She said they are still in discussions with Aetna.

In August, the state was notified that the Winston-Salem region was interested in purchasing the women’s tournament so that they could host both the men’s and the women’s tour. They weren’t able to get approval for the men’s tour in time to create a combined event, which gave Connecticut a brief window to match their offer, which it did, Barnes said in a conference call with reporters Thursday.

“In other parts of the world it is common for governments to own tennis tournaments,” Barnes said. “There are no examples we were able to identify in the United States of public entities owning tennis tournaments or other sporting events in exactly this way.”

However, he said there’s a long history of governments heavily subsidizing sports events and venues through capital financing. For example, the state paid for the Connecticut Tennis Center at Yale where the tournament has been played for the past 16 years. The state also owns Rentschler Field in East Hartford where the University of Connecticut football team plays its home games.

Barnes argued that the state was making a very “modest” investment given the size of the economic development return.

An economic impact study conducted in 2008 found that the tournament generates about $26 million in regional economic impact, including almost 300 jobs and $1.1 million in state tax revenue. It has brought more than 1.5 million spectators to the city.

But since that time, attendance has dropped off. Attendance this year was around 45,000, according to Worcester.

The tournament has lost or broken even in recent years, Barnes said.

Barnes maintained that the state understands the risk that it has taken on, given that weather and interest in tennis as a sport plays a big role in attendance.

Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero, R-Norwalk, was left scratching his head over the news of the state’s investment.

“State government’s core mission is to provide for the public safety, educate our youth, and extend the well being of our seniors,” Cafero said. “At a time when our federal overseers are citing the state of Connecticut for its failure to ensure the safety of our most vulnerable youngsters in DCF care, Connecticut is now expanding its reach into professional tennis . . . is perplexing.”

Cafero went on to wonder if this investment had anything to do with the 2014 governor’s race.

“What are we buying into, except for votes in the gubernatorial race?’’ Cafero asked.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(5) Comments

posted by: art vandelay | October 10, 2013  11:18pm

art vandelay

Now the state is in the business of Tennis.  What next.  If the tournament is a looser it should die a quiet death.  I’m sick of my hard earned tax dollars chasing white elephants.  Come on people!  Wake up and vote Republican for once in your life.

posted by: miketcha | October 10, 2013  11:39pm

Really doesn’t sound like a good investment. Where are the figures that make this a good investment. What is the projected returns on investment over the next 5 years. Adding a layer of bureaucratic oversight will cost more money not less.What will the state do to increase attendance at this poorly attended event.
Why not buy a professional sports team? For that matter, why not buy UTC, or Atena? At least, we know they turn a profit and have brighter economic futures…to bad we are against State Capitalism

posted by: Noteworthy | October 11, 2013  11:33am

Only state government people think $680K is small money. There are zero big names in the tournament; the audience is dwindling at alarming rates. In the last tournament, they roped off the top seats to force everybody in the lower tiers and even those seats weren’t full. There was only one food venue. Given the state’s history of sports and sports marketing and the public’s lack luster support for professional and even minor league sports here, how is any of this going to change now that taxpayers are on the hook for nearly three quarters of a million dollars?

posted by: ocoandasoc | October 11, 2013  12:51pm

Probably not a good move. Most of the State’s affluent (i.e., can afford overpriced tickets) tennis fans are retiring and moving to North Carolina… or TN, or FL, etc. which is why the other half of the tournament has already moved south. Spending an extra million (or more!) a year on education or infrastructure would probably yield a much better economic return on the State’s investment. But then that wouldn’t be as sexy or glamorous as owning a tennis tourney. (They’ll need to expand the VIP seating area to hold all the CT office holders.) Look for the CT Lottery, maybe the DOT, and companies looking to secure lucrative State contracts to become tournament “sponsors” in the near future as paid attendance continues to decline.  And if the State is looking for another investment opportunity in the sporting world I hear there’s a polo tournament in Farmington they can get for under a half a million!

posted by: art vandelay | October 11, 2013  4:10pm

art vandelay

I agree with both Noteworthy & ocoandasco. The only successful publicly financed sports venue are the Green Bay Packers. Yes the citizens of Green Bay OWN the team and profit immensely. Locally the New Britain Rock Cats and Connecticut Sun do well, but tennis has never caught on with younger generations. Another looser.