Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Video Review | Fujitsu ScanSnap ix100 Mobile Document Scanner
Oct 12, 2014 3:35 pm
Fujitsu’s ScanSnap scanners are known for scanning large volumes of documents quickly while capturing both sides of a...more »
Video | iPhone 6 Review - Is it worth the upgrade?
Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am
The release of a new iPhone has almost become an Autumn holiday — especially for the hundreds of eager customers who more »

Our Partners

˜

New London Lawmaker Turns Defiant, Challenges New Speaker

by Hugh McQuaid | Mar 6, 2013 5:17pm
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Town News, New London, State Capitol

Christine Stuart file photo

Reps. Don Clemens and Ernest Hewett on the first day of the legislative session

An inappropriate comment by a lawmaker has the new House speaker dealing with his first major controversy and looking to establish a standing protocol on sexual harassment.

Last week, news broke of comments made by Rep. Ernest Hewett, D-New London, during a legislative hearing. After hearing a 17-year-old Connecticut Science Center intern talk about overcoming a fear of snakes, Hewett said “If you’re bashful, I’ve got a snake sitting under my desk here.”

The remark was caught in an audio recording, which eventually attracted national media attention. Hewett apologized and said the comments were misconstrued.

But after listening to the recording, House Speaker Brendan Sharkey, a fellow Democrat, removed Hewett from his deputy speaker leadership position, a demotion that will cost him more than $6,000 a year.

Hewett’s subsequent responses to news media inquiries have inflamed the situation in the eyes of some of his female colleagues. He told the Hartford Courant that he avoided being assigned female interns because “that keeps me good and that keeps everybody else good.”

After the remark was published, Rep. Mae Flexer, a former chairwoman of the legislative internship committee, told the New London Day that Hewett had a history of “bad behavior” and said the internship committee sought to avoid exposing young women to his behavior. Flexer, flanked by two other female lawmakers Wednesday, declined to elaborate further on her remarks.

Hoping to have Hewett address the allegations, Sharkey invited the embattled lawmaker to a meeting Tuesday with the female members of the House Democratic Caucus.

“If there are other elements of behaviors that have been brought to his attention or have not, I think maybe he needs to hear about that,” he said.

But Hewett declined in this March 4 letter to Sharkey. He also was absent for Wednesday’s legislative session, but declined to offer an explanation when reached by phone.

“It has become apparent that I used a poor choice of words that have been misinterpreted by many others, causing me, my wife and my three children overwhelming public humiliation,” he wrote to Sharkey.

He reiterated his apology, which he said the Connecticut Science Center intern accepted last week.

“As a result, I consider this matter closed and l will not be appearing before the Democratic Caucus tomorrow as you have requested,” he wrote.

Sharkey said he was disappointed by Hewett’s decision not to attend the meeting but planned to take no further action against him. Asked if he planned to investigate Hewett or call for his resignation, Sharkey said “no.”

“With regard to Rep. Hewett, I think that I’ve taken the appropriate action that I can take as speaker. I’ve done all that I can do as speaker at this point,” he said.

But the incident has sparked a new focus by Sharkey into the atmosphere at the state legislature. He said he is looking to develop a “zero tolerance” policy when it comes to sexual harassment, and a protocol for reporting incidents.

Prior to taking over this year as speaker, he was unaware of inappropriate behavior by Hewett or any other lawmakers, but he said that may be a function of his gender.

“Not to say that didn’t exist, but that was something that I did not personally experience. But then again, I’m a male. So perhaps I was not as attuned to those issues as women in our caucus were,” he said.

Rep. Diana Urban, D-North Stonington, said that might be the case. “Let’s be honest, he’s a guy,” she said Wednesday. As a woman with a background in academia, Urban said the state Capitol can sometimes be uncomfortable.

“I think there’s been a sort of ignored atmosphere that is a bit uncomfortable and it hasn’t been addressed because there hasn’t been a protocol to address it,” she said.

Urban credited Sharkey with requiring sexual harassment training of lawmakers, a policy he put in place before the Hewett controversy, and for looking to establish a protocol.

“We’re changing to the extent that there is an atmosphere that is inappropriate in this building. I want to root it out and have a zero tolerance policy with regard to it. That’s the action I’m taking,” Sharkey said.

Sharkey said the Hewett incident was the first time as speaker he has had to deal with allegations of sexual harassment among his caucus members. Though he said he had no clear precedents for dealing with the issue, Sharkey said he didn’t want to leave anyone with the impression that House leadership, represented by men, wasn’t taking the issue seriously.

“I want to . . . make sure that no one is feeling as though this is an issue not being addressed, particularly by male leaders of our caucus. It’s important to me that we create an environment that’s positive for everyone,” he said.

Hewett did not attend Wednesday’s legislative session. As his colleagues cast votes on judicial nominations and Sandy Hook relief legislation, his chair in the House chamber remained empty.

Sharkey said he had some decisions to make regarding how he would engage the other members of his caucus.

Urban said there was an underlying disappointment at the meeting the day before among female lawmakers that Hewett would not address them. She said they were disappointed he believed the issue was resolved when he’d made troubling comments about female interns.

But she agreed with Sharkey’s decision not to take further action against Hewett.

“It’s in Ernie’s constituents’ hands and well it should be. They’re the ones who elect him, they’re the ones he represents,” she said.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(4) Comments

posted by: hgd | March 6, 2013  11:26pm

There are laws and protocols to follow.The state of CT. is the employeer and will be open to lawsuits because of previous incidents.Link-www.ct.gov/chro/cwp/view.asp?a=2527q=333112

posted by: tracyjm | March 7, 2013  10:03am

Now remember, it’s the Republicans who hate women. What Ernie said is no worse than the past behavior of President Clinton, Eliot Spitzer or the scandal du jour sourrounding Bob Menendez. Harry Reid has Bob’s back, why can’t Sharkey do the same for Ernie. After all, a sex scandal for a Democrat carries the same weight as a parking ticket.

posted by: kenneth_krayeske | March 7, 2013  11:06am

Rep. Hewett must resign. By the time he runs for re-election again, this will be forgotten, or other issues will be more pressing. Or, more likely, the Democratic loyalists in New London will not primary him (for the same reasons the partisans in the House have remained silent about his previous inappropriate behavior, as Rep. Flexer has pointed out).  Sometimes, we need to undo the results of the election because the character of the elected official in question is so problematic as to hinder the ethical progress of self-governance (see Gov. John Rowland, Sen. Lou DeLuca - who was involved in a similar imbroglio involving violence against women). We need to lower our tolerance for official misconduct. Rep. Hewett, the matter is not closed.

posted by: Historian | March 7, 2013  12:35pm

Oh. Goody a witch hunt, or in this case a warlock hunt. The peasants are out with their torches. 
  There is no evidence that Mr. Hewitt did anything wrong - Literally.
  PC craziness does’t not need reality - remember all the satanic ritual sex and murder reports ?  How about the millions of children being abducted or homeless.  Most of these crusades are the result of dramatic or trumatic event = in this case Newtown.  Now a couple of witch hunters have made claims of prior behavior.  Prove them. What is the evidence? Names, Dates Witnessess. This blog is responsible now for getting that info or “printing” publically the retraction and pilloring the slanderers. No one has the right to cry falsely “fire” in a crowded room. No one.