CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

DC NEWS JUNKIE | Blumenthal, Animal Cruelty and Cecil the Lion

by | Aug 11, 2015 5:30am () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Congress, Environment, Law Enforcement

Wikimedia Commons Sen. Richard Blumenthal introduced a bill late last month intended, he said, to reduce the number of endangered animals killed for trophies. But it was not the first time Blumenthal had proposed a measure designed to prevent animal cruelty.

In July, Blumenthal introduced the creatively named “Conserving Ecosystems by Ceasing the Importation of Large (CECIL) Animal Trophies Act,” in response to the killing of an African lion, named Cecil, by an American dentist.

“The hunting and poaching of endangered species is a reprehensible and repugnant act,” said Blumenthal. “The death of this beloved lion was a preventable tragedy that demonstrates the urgent need to protect precious — and all too often vulnerable — wildlife. We cannot continue to allow innocent animals to be threatened by trophy killing — we must ensure that generations to come can experience and enjoy everything nature has to offer. I am proud to join my colleagues on this measure that will provide critical protections to animals across the globe.”

—Click here to receive email updates from DC NEWS JUNKIE!

African lions are not listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, though the FWS has proposed adding African lions to the list. Blumenthal’s bill would extend protections afforded to animals listed as threatened to those that have been proposed.

Earlier last month, Blumenthal introduced the senate version of the “Prevent Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act,” which would criminalize so-called “animal crushing.”

In an expose released last year, Salon, quoting a Miami Herald piece, said “crushing videos” involve “torturing and killing a wide variety of animals, including chickens, rabbits, and more for the sexual gratification of its viewers.”

Creation and dissemination of those videos was made illegal in 2010, a result of the “Animal Crush Video Prevention Act,” which was co-sponsored by Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, Rep. Jim Himes, D-4th District, and Rep. John Larson, D-1st District, among others.

That bill defines animal crush videos “as any photograph, motion picture, film, video or digital recording, or electronic image that: (1) depicts actual conduct in which one or more living non-human mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians is intentionally crushed, burned, drowned, suffocated, impaled, or otherwise subjected to serious bodily injury; and (2) is obscene.”

Blumenthal’s proposed bill goes one step further, criminalizing the act of animal crushing itself.

In 2013, Blumenthal proposed the “Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act,” an ultimately successful attempt to make it a crime to be in attendance at a staged animal fight.

When that bill was first introduced in 2011, Scott Brown, then a Republican senator from Massachusetts, said “Animal fighting events are barbaric and cesspools of gang and other criminal activity.”

“Animal fighting is a cruel and inhumane criminal enterprise perpetuated by the spectators who fund it,” Blumenthal said then. “This bill seeks to extinguish the horrific treatment of animals and risks to public safety associated with animal fighting. Exposing innocent children to animal fighting as spectators unconscionably continues the vicious cycle of cruelty and abuse.”

A revised Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act was included in the 2014 Farm Bill, making it a felony to knowingly bring a minor under the age of 16 to a dogfight or cockfight, and a federal misdemeanor to knowingly attend a fight as a spectator.

Jordan Fenster can be reached by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) or @JordanFenster on Twitter.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comments

(8) Archived Comments

posted by: oldtimer | August 11, 2015  6:25am

Blumenthal is a walking, talking cartoon. It’s amazing that he defends abortion and Planned Parenthood’s reprehensible activities while disturbed about Cecil the lion.

posted by: Salmo | August 11, 2015  12:40pm

Just for the record: Abortion is also a reprehensible and repugnant act. Of course I’m not looking for votes from any particular constituency.

posted by: MyOpinion | August 11, 2015  1:37pm

I feel bad about the Lion and the whole situation, but PLEASE Blumenthal, don’t we have enough problems in the US for you to pay attention to, than come up with a fancy named bill to protect animals in Africa?

posted by: NoNonsense | August 11, 2015  3:35pm

@MyOpinion: Are you kidding? Why on earth would Blumenthal miss out on a perfect opportunity to get some media attention? For heaven’s sake, he could go into withdrawal.

posted by: CTtransplant | August 12, 2015  11:41am

I’m no fan of trophy hunting. As a falconer, I firmly believe that everything taken in the hunt should be consumed either by the falconer or the falcon (hawk, eagle) and nothing be wasted. However, I I found some interesting viewpoints in this article about how trophy hunting, when properly managed, can help prevent habitat loss that is a much greater threat to animal species like lions.

posted by: NoNonsense | August 12, 2015  7:30pm

@CTtransplant: Despite Blumenthal’s bill, this issue isn’t really about trophy hunting in general (which, frankly, disgusts me but is beside the point). Controlled and legal hunts, or culling overpopulated areas to preserve habitat, are not the problem. This particular lion was in a protected preserve and was lured into an area where he was shot—illegally, without a permit. The issue is poaching. Protected animals like elephants and rhinos in preserves are being poached as trophies and for their horns and tusks.

posted by: SocialButterfly | August 13, 2015  10:18am

More political posturing by Blumenthal to his the fact that our country is facing fiscal bankruptcy and this is just another one of his daily smoke-screens hiding that fact from the people. He is treating his constituents like his self-designated idiots. Sadly we elected him along with other life-time politicians who “continue to be “careless with the truth with our people.”

posted by: CTtransplant | August 18, 2015  9:53am

NoNonsense

No argument there. Even though controlled hunts can help conservation efforts, sadly, the corruption that is rife, in some of the countries where these type of hunts so often take place, usually results in the money being used for corrupt leaders rather than habitat preservation and conservation efforts. As long as despotic leaders rule these countries, a local villager or hunting guide can make way more in facilitating poaching than they can leading legal hunts.

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

Sponsored Messages