Social Networks We Use


CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners


After Criticism And Further Scrutiny, Democrats Return $10K Donation

by Christine Stuart | Dec 11, 2013 6:51pm
(6) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2014, Ethics, Legal

Courtesy of the Comcast Spectacor website In the face of criticism and calls to withdraw a request for $1.8 million in state bonding, the Connecticut Democratic Party will refund a $10,000 donation from Edward Snider, CEO of Comcast Spectacor.

Snider, whose Pennsylvania-based Comcast Spectacor is the parent company of Global Spectrum, made a donation of $10,000 to the state Democratic Party in August. It was the maximum donation amount allowed under the law.

Global Spectrum has been contracted by the state to manage the Hartford XL Center and Rentschler Field in East Hartford. The company is further poised to receive $1.8 million from the state Bond Commission on Friday.

Less than an hour before Democrats announced the decision to return the donation, Republican House Leader Lawrence Cafero called upon the Bond Commission to delay approving the item until the issue over whether Snider was a state contractor could be settled.

“There is a contract to manage the XL Center by a subsidiary of Snider’s parent company and state contractors are barred from giving money to the state party accounts. This needs to be addressed immediately,” Cafero said.

James Hallinan, a spokesman for the Democratic Party, said the party relies upon the information provided by its donors on the state contribution form. In Snider’s case, “we had a fully-completed and signed non-federal contribution form.” In addition, Hallinan says it cross-referenced the donor information with the list of prohibited state contractors provided by the State Elections Enforcement Commission.

Contribution form

“Spectacor, which Mr. Snider listed as his employer, does not appear on any of the prohibited contributors lists,” Hallinan said. “After learning further financial information regarding Comcast Spectacor’s relationship with Global Spectrum, the Connecticut Democratic Party has decided to issue a refund to Mr. Snider for his contribution.”

The Capital Region Development Authority, a quasi-public agency Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy created last year, awarded Global Spectrum the contracts to operate the two facilities in February. Malloy also sets the state Bond Commission’s agenda.

Republican gubernatorial hopeful and Senate Minority Leader John McKinney called Snider’s donation to Democrats’ state PAC a clear violation of campaign finance laws because he is considered a state contractor. He said the donation should be investigated.

“Mr. Snider doesn’t live in Connecticut and has never given to the Connecticut Democratic Party before. But, all of the sudden, at the same time his company is bidding for a multi-million dollar state contract, he decides to write a check for the maximum contribution of $10,000 and, lo and behold, is awarded the contract to manage the XL Center and Rentschler Field,” McKinney said in a Tuesday statement.

House Minority Leader Larry Cafero echoed McKinney’s comments.

“This bond appropriation ought to be pulled until the questions surrounding the donation of $10,000 by Mr. Snider to the Democrats can be resolved,” Cafero said in a letter to OPM released by his office. “There is a contract to manage the XL Center by a subsidiary of Snider’s parent company and state contractors are barred from giving money to the state party accounts. This needs to be addressed immediately.”

The contract was awarded by the state before the Aug. 23 donation by Snider.

Asked about the contribution earlier Wednesday, Connecticut Democratic Party Executive Director Jonathan Harris said “we follow all the rules and regulations under state and federal campaign finance laws.”

He said the party will continue raising money “within the law.” He declined to elaborate on whether he thought Mr. Snider was a state contractor. But after further review, the party opted to refund the donation.

Cheri Quickmire, executive director of Common Cause in Connecticut which spearheaded the landmark 2005 changes to campaign finance law, said the donation is a “problem” if Mr. Snider is a state contractor. She said the law prohibits state contractors and lobbyists from contributing to state party accounts.

The changes to the law came about after former Gov. John G. Rowland resigned and later pleaded guilty to corruption charges for accepting gifts from state contractors.

On Tuesday after a speech to the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, who has not announced his reelection bid but has been fundraising on behalf of the party said he would continue to follow the law.

“The standard to apply is whether we are compliant with the law, and we’ll hold ourselves to that standard,” Malloy said.

McKinney called that a a pretty low standard.

“In his own words, the governor established a low ethical standard for his fundraising efforts yesterday,” McKinney said Wednesday. “And today, he and his party have admitted that they have failed to meet even their own low standard. They have broken campaign finance laws.”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(6) Comments

posted by: StanMuzyk | December 11, 2013  10:40pm

It took four months of outcry of criticism to finally get this political payola donation-scenario-reversed.

posted by: dano860 | December 12, 2013  8:17am

Just another one of Dannel’s “damn the torpedo’s” or “ask for forgiveness not permission” methods of operation.
He missed this one when they were re-writing the campaign finance laws to fall into his favor.

posted by: Noteworthy | December 12, 2013  9:14am

This problem would not exist if Malloy and the Democratic Party was not selling the state, its access to top leaders legislatively as well as the credit card of taxpayers. It’s not just this contribution - it’s NU’s strong arming its executives and all the rest of it. It’s especially galling knowing Malloy will run as a “clean elections candidate” with public money. The real question is why can’t these political operations and politicians just do the right non-manipulated right thing?

posted by: msconcerned | December 12, 2013  12:19pm

“Spectacor, which Mr. Snider listed as his employer, does not appear on any of the prohibited contributors lists - just a matter of symantecs, I would think if the Democratic Chair did not perform due diligence, then there should be a team assigned to carry out this duty.  Additionally there is no reason a system of “checks and balances” is not in place otherwise it could leave one to believe there are some self-serving members on the committee…

posted by: msconcerned | December 12, 2013  12:21pm

Comcast is already raping the residents of New Haven, and now they’re going to politics with politics.

posted by: StanMuzyk | December 12, 2013  12:59pm

misconcerned: I changed over to U-Verse.  Very pleased with their performance and covered programming availability.