Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

Education Bill Still A Work In Progress, New Draft Limits Commissioner’s Power

by Christine Stuart | Apr 26, 2012 10:48am
(7) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Education

Christine Stuart photo

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and Jim Finley, executive director of the CT Conference of Municipalities

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy told a roomful of municipal officials Wednesday not to count on any funds tied to the education reform package because in its present form he “would veto the legislation.”

The education reform bill Malloy unveiled Feb. 8 was revised in March by the legislature’s Education Committee. A new draft of the legislation was floating around the Capitol on Wednesday, but it was not known if the governor would support it.

“We are currently reviewing the bill,” Andrew Doba, Malloy’s spokesman, said Thursday morning.

Education Committee Co-Chair Rep. Andrew Fleischmann buzzed around the House Wednesday with this eight-page summary of the new bill as he tried to get rank-and-file lawmakers to support it. The new bill, which hasn’t been filed yet, is rumored to be about 208 pages.

Fleischmann declined comment Wednesday on the new legislation.

The summary of the bill includes 1,000 new early preschool slots, 500 for the “education reform districts,” 250 for priority school districts, and 250 for competitive districts. It requires public schools to include 20 minutes of physical activity in each school day for kindergarten to fifth-grade students. It eliminates the education commissioner’s ability to accept private donations for exemplary schools and his ability to reconstitute a low-achieving school by making it a state or local charter school under the control of a private entity.

Any schools considered “turnaround” schools or the low performing schools participating in the “Commissioner’s Network” are prohibited from choosing a private entity to manage or govern the school, unless it is a “private, not-for-profit CT college or university.” It also mandates that any turnaround plan that conflicts with a current existing union contract “will be negotiated with the appropriate union under the Teachers Negotiation Act.”

It also requires the state Board of Education to approve two state charter schools with a primary focus on English language learners before approving any other charter school applicants.

The most controversial portion of the legislation to date has been the new language related to teacher evaluation, tenure, and certification. According to the summary, the new bill requires a teacher who does not receive an evaluation for the year to be designated as “not rated” rather than rated “proficient.” It also allows the education commissioner to waive requirement that local school boards adopt a new evaluation system if he determines its existing program is in compliance with the new state guidelines.

Further, the new bill would require school boards to provide training for all teachers and administrators they employ before implementing an evaluation system. And it says the commissioner must select 10 districts to pilot the new evaluation system by June 1, 2012.

The proposal also requires certificates to be valid for five years and continued every five years. And starting July 1, 2016, it would require an applicant for a professional certificate to have a master’s degree in his or her endorsement area and eliminates all other proposed certification changes.

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(7) Comments

posted by: justsayin | April 26, 2012  12:34pm

The “bully” at the pulpit strikes again, “with-hold the cash” unless…Enough on this already, kill the bill! Come back when you have meaningful legislation that really helps fix the problem.

posted by: Linda12 | April 26, 2012  6:00pm

Will Pryor even stay with limited power? I never gave him much more than three years anyway. 

The big question is what will he do with all the new positions he created (all former buddies, lawyers and Yale graduates) and how much longer is he going to rob the SERC coffers?

If he has limited powers isn’t it possible he can do this job without aides, consultants, ed reformers, policy wonks, talking heads,etc…...tons of money to help those at the top.

Very little left to help those in the classroom.

posted by: GoatBoyPHD | April 26, 2012  6:16pm

GoatBoyPHD

The House Bill is a Union written Bill to identify the legislators getting election year funding.

This is all theater for another week. Then the House makes begrudging concessions to Malloy—not enough to lose campaign funding mind you.

posted by: TerryW | April 26, 2012  7:25pm

Riccards is about to have a man-sized hissy fit:

Kind of funnny…why does the HC always quote him?  I guess ConnWon’t.

http://www.courant.com/news/education/hc-education-reform-0427-20120426,0,2706465.story

posted by: Tom Burns | April 27, 2012  12:48am

Keep your money—and veto the bill
But you wont—-Im watching—

posted by: CONconn | April 27, 2012  10:14am

Riccards is acting like a big baby because he’s starting to learn that all the money and the Subway sandwiches in the world won’t defeat the watchful eyes and numerous votes of teachers who truly care about children, and will do whatever they can to keep corporate leaches from exploiting them.

posted by: Mo Government | April 27, 2012  8:48pm

Why limit anyone’s power at the state?  They are so full of good ideas and mean well.  Why not turn all the schools over to Malloy and all our problems will be solved.  You elected him, you wanted him, you got him, not let him run wild…