Social Networks We Use


CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners


GOP Takes The Secretary of The State To Court Over Ballot Order

by Christine Stuart | Aug 10, 2012 12:26pm
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Courts, Election 2012, Election Policy

(Updated 1:48 p.m.) Connecticut Republicans are taking Secretary of the State Denise Merrill to court and seeking an injunction against her office in a fight over which party gets the top ballot line.

The lawsuit filed Thursday follows a letter Republicans sent Merrill’s office in July pointing out that it was their gubernatorial candidate in 2010 who received the most votes even though he didn’t win. Merrill rejected their arguments in this letter  explaining that Democrat Dannel P. Malloy received the most votes for governor even though he received them on two separate party lines. Malloy received 540,970 votes on the Democratic line, and 26,308 on the Working Families Party line.

Republicans argue that Tom Foley received 567,278 votes on the Republican line, which was the most received on a single line and should have given them Row A in 2011. They admittedly failed to catch the mistake in 2011.

“Unfortunately, the Secretary’s unfounded and apparently partisan-driven position leaves us no choice but to seek redress in the courts,” Republican Party Chairman Jerry Labriola said. “We believe the Secretary of the State’s interpretation is wrong and it would be unfair to Connecticut voters to allow these elections to proceed unlawfully.”

Av Harris, a spokesman for Merrill, said the office will be able to respond more fully after it has a chance to review the lawsuit. However, “we’re very confident the law was correctly interpreted with regards to the ballot order,” he added.

The 2011 municipal election was the first election in decades where Democratic candidates appeared on the top of the ballot because ballot order is determined by gubernatorial vote totals.

In their letter Republicans cited Connecticut General Statutes 9-249a as the basis for their argument.

“The party whose candidate for governor polled the highest number of votes in the last preceding election,” is what determines the ballot order of the parties, according to Republican interpretation.

While Merrill didn’t dispute the correct citation of the statute she said when she investigated this issue back in 2011 she reached a different conclusion.

“You correctly identify the candidates for governor; however, you do not differentiate between the appearance of a candidate on the ballot by ‘party’ nomination and by nominating petition with a ‘party designation’,” Merrill wrote. “Taking this crucial difference into account results in the conclusion reached by my office in 2011: the Democratic Party is listed on the first row on the ballot followed by the Republican Party.”

The argument Republicans believe is “thin.”

“While going to court is never a first option, we strongly feel that this is our party’s only recourse,“ House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero said.

But Democratic Party Chairwoman Nancy DiNardo disagrees.

Ballot order is a matter that has proven to be historically meaningless, she said. Democrats occupied Row B on the ballot in 2010 and won every statewide office, every federal race, and maintained majorities in both chambers of the Connecticut General Assembly.  In 2008, also from Row B, Democrats carried the state for President, swept the federal races, and maintained healthy majorities in both chambers.

“Vision, hard work, and guts matter more to Connecticut voters than which row a candidate’s name is listed on,” added DiNardo. “The election will be determined not by placement on the ballot, but by the strength of the candidates.”

But Republican’s aren’t leaving anything to chance. The lawsuit was filed Thursday.

“The 2012 election is of critical importance to both our state and our country and Republican candidates running for office ought not be placed at a disadvantage by an inaccurate reading of a statute by a Democrat official,” Cafero said. “It is my hope that the court sees, as we do, that the law calls for the Republican Party to be on the top line.”

Republicans are being represented by attorney’s Proloy Das and Richard Healey of Rome McGuigan.

Tags: , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(8) Comments

posted by: AndersonScooper | August 10, 2012  1:30pm

The CT GOP is a bunch of whiners.

They don’t hold a single statewide office, nor a seat in Congress, but they think it’s still their turn to occupy the top of the ballot?

This is almost as pathetic as Jerry Labriola Jr.‘s congressional campaign. Sad. Really sad.

posted by: CT Jim | August 10, 2012  4:20pm

I thought Reepublicans were for TORT reform??? They file more frivolous lawsuits than any other entity in the world…

posted by: UConnHoop | August 10, 2012  5:19pm

If you use the Sec. of the State’s logic, why shouldn’t the Working Families Party (aka Socialists) have the top line?  Malloy was endorsed by them as well as the Dems.

posted by: SalRomano | August 10, 2012  7:42pm

Anderson Scooper & CT Jim:  You won’t blame the Democrats you elected—who are fiscally burying the state—and instead slamming Republicans who aren’t in office?  Is this “reverse psychology”—as you can’t have it both ways!

posted by: CT Jim | August 10, 2012  8:27pm

Really??? Working families socialists???? So a party that only advocates for working family issues like health care ,minimum wage and paid sickdays is todays equivilant of socialism but advocating moving good paying jobs to countries that pay $53 a month in wages with no healthcare while pushing up unemployement in the USA is’nt marxism is laughable

posted by: CT Jim | August 10, 2012  8:30pm

I stooped posting for a while here because the right wing nut jobs took over…. I was right

posted by: Lawrence | August 11, 2012  7:56am

CT Jim,  Don’t sweat it.

UConnHoop can’t read, and so he/she/it doesn’t know the legal difference between “party” and “party designation,” and “truth” and “fraud,” and “political desperation” and all that other common knowledge stuff. He/she/it is just a right-wing teabagger willing to repeat any lie he/she/it is told to.

Now, on to the general election…

and—Paul Ryan, GOP VP??

Couldn’t have picked a more divisive candidate for the American public. His alternative budget was so soundly rejected by right/center Republicans that his being picked by Romney tells you who REALLY runs the national Republican Party—the richest and most anti-human, idoelogically conservative right-wingers imaginable.

posted by: Joe Eversole | August 11, 2012  8:37am

Yes Jim, a party that advocates for the State to Provide Health Care (via other taxpayers money), dictates to business how it should operate (wages,days off) are Marixst Issues.  Free market concepts don’t embrace those at all.  Free market indicates that employers and employees with come to agreement on wages, sick days, insurance benefits,etc. without government intrusion.  So, in a nutshell, yes the Working Families Party espouses Marxist philosophies.