Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Upcoming Trends We Saw at CES 2015
Jan 21, 2015 8:08 am
After recording over 40 videos about individual products at International CES 2015, the burning question from many...more »
VoteTocracy Hopes to Bridge Gap Between Voters and Congress
Jan 13, 2015 11:34 am
For years, voters who wanted to learn about issues and discuss them with their elected officials in Congress have had...more »

Our Partners

Gun Rights Groups Appeal Thursday Court Decision

by Hugh McQuaid | Jan 31, 2014 4:25pm
(3) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Courts

A lawyer for a group of gun rights groups and firearm sellers has appealed a Thursday decision by a federal court judge upholding a new Connecticut gun control law as constitutional.

Attorney Brian Stapleton filed a notice of appeal Thursday, just a day after U.S. District Court Judge Alfred Covello concluded that Connecticut’s new ban on certain rifles and ammunition magazines was constitutional.

“The court concludes that the legislation is constitutional. While the act burdens the plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights, it is substantially related to the important governmental interest of public safety and crime control,” the decision reads.

Stapleton represents the Coalition of Connecticut Sportsmen, Connecticut Citizens Defense League, gun store owners, and individual citizens in their challenge of the gun control law. He appealed the case to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Tags: , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(3) Comments

posted by: cnj-david | January 31, 2014  4:40pm

In response to the judge’s decision I sent a 50$ check today to CCDL and a 25$ check to 2nd Amendment Foundation.

posted by: BHirsh | February 1, 2014  2:01pm

Wrong standard of review, judge.

Strict scrutiny is required, and “substantially related” doesn’t overcome that burden.

Strict scrutiny requires that the “compelling public safety interest” can only overcome constitutional protections if the law under consideration brings evidential proof that it will actually achieve that purpose, and that it will use the least intrusive means possible to that end.

Connecticut’s law fails both of the latter.

This ruling will ultimately be vacated and remanded.

posted by: Chien DeBerger | February 2, 2014  4:56pm

Sending my magnanimous tax refund check from Danny to the CCDL litigation fund!