Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Video | iPhone 6 Review - Is it worth the upgrade?
Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am
The release of a new iPhone has almost become an Autumn holiday — especially for the hundreds of eager customers who more »
Hartford Entrepreneur is Crunching Numbers for the Greater Good
Sep 18, 2014 6:59 am
Data is vitally important to most nonprofits. It is a key component for seeking grant funds, gives a clear picture of...more »

Our Partners

˜

Lawmakers Approve Wind Regulations Lifting Defacto Moratorium

by Christine Stuart | Apr 22, 2014 12:29pm
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Energy, Environment

Christine Stuart photo

Rep. Selim Noujaim and Sen. Andres Ayala

Ending what has been an informal three-year moratorium on wind power in Connecticut, a legislative committee unanimously approved regulations Tuesday paving the way for wind turbines.

The regulations, which were postponed for clerical reasons or rejected without prejudice at least four times prior to Tuesday’s meeting, finally met the approval of the committee and its attorneys. Prior drafts submitted by the Connecticut Siting Council, which oversees the location of transmission lines and cellphone towers, were rejected for a variety of reasons.

Legislative attorneys said the difference between previous versions and the one approved Tuesday was the way in which the turbines would be decommissioned by a certified engineer, and the new language specified that a waiver would apply to shadow flicker and setback distances, but not noise.

Rep. Arthur O’Neill, R-Southbury, described the process of approving the regulations as “torturous.”

The regulations drafted by the Connecticut Siting Council were first rejected in December 2012 and last withdrawn by the council in November 2013.

O’Neill said the process the Regulations Review Committee goes through is often misunderstood and some of the assumptions about the motivations of the committee were “unwarranted.”

Some environmental advocates have speculated that approval was delayed based on the lack of support for wind power among committee members.

“This is a big deal,” O’Neill said. “It required attention by the Siting Council as well as the committee to get it right. I think we finally got it right.”

Sen. Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said the regulations approved Tuesday would have been approved months ago if the Siting Council listened to the committee’s recommendations regarding decommissioning. He said the Siting Council said the attorney general’s office had told them it couldn’t be done. But later — when the committee requested a formal opinion — the attorney general’s office said the decommissioning process could be written to abide by the committee’s recommendations.

Christine Stuart photo Robert Stein, chairman of the Connecticut Siting Council, dismissed the criticism saying “we had challenges and they had challenges.”

He said they spoke to people in the attorney general’s office, but not the attorney general. When the committee asked for a formal decision from the attorney general, the casual advice the Siting Council had gotten ended up being wrong.

But no one wanted to talk about those struggles on Earth Day.

Rep. Elissa Wright, D-Noank , said the new regulations provide the people of Connecticut with appropriate protections and give the state the opportunity to move forward with a clean, renewable energy source.

“There will be opportunity in the future, if necessary, to revisit the regulations and refine them further,” Wright said.

Christine Stuart photo Joyce Hemingson, president of FairwindCT, said that while they would have liked to see a greater setback distance she’s happy there are regulations in place.

“We wanted regulations that would be protective of the health and safety of the citizens,” Hemingson said Tuesday after the vote.

Derek Phelps, a lobbyist for Pioneer Green Energy, which is looking to site a wind turbine in the eastern part of the state, said his client is pleased with the action taken.

“It means what has been effectively a moratorium is now lifted,” Phelps said.

That means Pioneer Green Energy still has time to qualify for federal tax credits that will make the project commercially viable.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(4) Comments

posted by: Salmo | April 22, 2014  5:27pm

A-h-h-h, yes. The good old Eastern part of the State. That’s where things get dumped that nobody else wants. I can’t wait to see how this plays out. Anybody take the time to check out the regs concerning windmills up in Falmouth, Cape Cod? You should. It’s very enlightening.

posted by: joryjohnson | April 23, 2014  7:50pm

wind power moratorium?  If we have a wind moratorium because of a handful of spoiled NIMBYS wouldn’t it be natural to have coal, oil and gas power plant moratorium?

posted by: joryjohnson | April 23, 2014  7:55pm

“We wanted regulations that would be protective of the health and safety of the citizens,” Hemingson said. 

Health and safety?  This is wind power folks.  The only issue here is if the thing falls over and crushes someone.  Why do coal, oil and gas get a pass on safety?

posted by: Marie Jane | April 25, 2014  4:49pm

You waited three years to do this???

As Salmo implies, you did not do your homework. After the fact, do check out Falmouth MA, Fairhaven MA, Scituate MA, Kingston MA the Hoosac Project in the beautiful Berkshires of MA.

There is no protection at 738 feet or with 30 hours of hell-like flicker.  Why ever did you take wording out of the “pro-wind handbook” instead of visiting the sites mentioned and talking to the residents and the city or town fathers.  After three years, one would think Connecticut would have built a better mouse trap and protected their citizens.  Oh, my!!!

XXX