Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 2:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »
Social Enterprise Trust Honors Entrepreneurs Who Hope to Change the World
Oct 28, 2014 11:51 pm
Entrepreneurs interested in making social changes across the world as well as growing their bottom line are an...more »

Our Partners

˜

Lawmakers Rule Out Tax Increase, Look To Spending Cuts, Tax Exemptions

by Christine Stuart | Apr 28, 2014 6:02pm
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired

Courtesy of OFA The co-chairs of the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee said they don’t plan to increase taxes to balance the budget, but they said some of Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s proposed tax relief, in addition to the $55 refund, may have to be postponed.

Rep. Patricia Widlitz, D-Guilford, said things like the sales tax exemption for over-the-counter drugs and other tax breaks they planned to offer when there was a surplus are under discussion in closed-door budget meetings. She declined to offer specifics about what tax breaks may disappear from the final budget.

CTNJ file photo The sales tax exemption on over-the-counter drugs would cost the state about $16.5 million in revenue. Exempting part of teachers’ pensions, like Malloy proposed, would cost the state about $23.1 million. Exempting municipal employees from a health insurance tax would cost about $8.7 million.

“All of those things are under discussion,” Widlitz said Monday.

The Office of Policy and Management declined to say exactly how far down its revenue projections are or if they’re different than the Office of Fiscal Analysis, which estimated Monday that revenues are lagging by about $276.9 million.

“The governor said several hundred million dollars and until we have an agreement with OFA on the projection we’d rather not give a number,” said Gian-Carl Casa, undersecretary for legislative affairs with the Office of Policy and Management.

The Office of Policy and Management and the Office of Fiscal Analysis must come to an agreement on revenues by the end of the day Wednesday, April 30.

No matter what happens, “I can tell you one thing, we’re not raising taxes,” Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, said.

Malloy announced Monday that he scrapped plans to use $155 million on a $55 taxpayer refund and make an additional $100 million payment to the state employee pension plan. The two proposals relied on the state ending this fiscal year with a more than $505 million surplus. That surplus has since disappeared as income tax revenue came in lower than estimated since the April 15 deadline.

“I was never concerned about the budget deal revolving around excess revenue,” House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero, R-Norwalk, said Monday. “What I’m concerned about is the budget itself. That has to be balanced. This deficit or less revenues continues on over the next two days, we’re now beyond excess revenue and we’re hitting into the revenue that was there to merely balance the budget.”

It’s a concern for people like Morna Murray, president and CEO of the Connecticut Community Providers Association. The members of the association are private, nonprofit providers who serve Connecticut’s neediest residents and rely on state funding.

Murray said Saturday that they’ve been pretty concerned about revenue projections and even more concerned that some of the funding for her member organizations may disappear. Murray’s organization opposed the $55 tax refund because it felt any additional money should be spent on service providers.

Even before revenues started to take a nosedive, CCPA was concerned its funding may be on the chopping block. There is concern that about $21 million in funding including about $10 million in state grants for outpatient services for those served by the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, $2 million for short-term respite care for children under state care, $4.4 million in residential services for the developmentally disabled, and a $5.5 million boost in Medicaid reimbursements.

“These were not increases,” Murray said.

She said the middle of the year adjustments would be enormously helpful to the population these organizations serve as they work through changes to the health care system and figure out exactly what health reform means for the bottom line.

“Medicaid rates don’t come close to covering the cost of care,” Murray said. “It’s been that way for 20 years and many of these organizations are just holding on.”

She said the providers who offer these services on behalf of the state are “salt of the earth folks who are mission driven, but have to cover the cost of care in order to stay in business.” She said any cut could put one of these providers out of business.

CTNJ file photo “We remain committed to protect the most vulnerable and I think that’s who Morna is representing,” Sen. Beth Bye, co-chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, said Monday when asked about the potential cuts.

Bye’s co-chair Rep. Toni Walker of New Haven said “everything is in a holding pattern” until the governor’s budget office and the legislature’s budget office agree on revenue estimates. That won’t happen until Wednesday, April 30.

Widlitz said this is the first year the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee co-chairs are at the budget negotiating table. She said in previous years they were not part of the negotiations when it came to the spending side of the budget. She said that was left up to the Appropriations Committee co-chairs. The budget negotiations are between legislative leaders and Malloy’s administration.

Republican lawmakers are not at the table.

“There’s going to be a lot of tough choices that have to be made and, again, I think we make those choices best when we do them together and not to the exclusion of the Republicans,” Cafero said Monday.

Hugh McQuaid contributed to this report.

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(8) Comments

posted by: ocoandasoc | April 28, 2014  8:05pm

CT legislators continue to spend money they haven’t got on things that aren’t needed (like tax exemptions for muni workers and teachers) just so they can get reelected and…. do the same all over again. Will CT voters ever wise up?

posted by: art vandelay | April 29, 2014  7:16am

art vandelay

When I was sixteen, I went to work and received my first paycheck.  I calculated the number of hours I worked times my wage which happened to be the minimum.  The numbers did not match.  I asked my grandfather why and he told me to look at the numbers on the second page.  I quickly got acquainted with abbreviations like FICA and others. My grandfather said, this is what the government takes.  When I was your age, there was no back page and I got to keep everything I made.  He also said the more they take the more they spend.  The income tax he explained is only a legal license to spend.  That was 45 years ago and he was right.

posted by: Lawrence | April 29, 2014  7:18am

ocoandasoc, CT is one of just a couple of states in America that actually taxes a teacher’s pension. Sounds like it’s time that changed.

If you want to look at a party spending money on things just to get re-elected, how about the CT Republicans proposing to spend $60 million on unemployment insurance reimbursements that businesses are required to pay? A few years ago CT borrowed $130 million at 4.1% interest to make our fund—paid for by businesses to help their employees lose their jobs—solvent. Now it’s time to pay it back.

CT Republicans can spend $60 million of taxpayer money to help CT businesses pay what they lawfully owe, but they are seeking to eliminate an Earned Income Tax Credit for lower-income state residents with jobs?

Remember in November!

posted by: Janster57 | April 29, 2014  7:20am

The inexplicable drama of the CT budget process continues. Theater of the Absurd with a bit of larceny. Love it.

posted by: dano860 | April 29, 2014  9:07am

(Democrat) “Lawmakers Rule Out Tax Increase, (As they) Look To (Eliminate) Spending Cuts, Tax Exemptions”. That’s how I see the headline.
“Republican lawmakers are not at the table.” This says one thing, the democrats can’t blame anyone but themselves for the mess that will be continuing in the next budget. By jumping out and offering the $55 refund they show how little they understand about the State of Connecticut its people and business’s.
The offering of the paltry $55 was going to cost more, just in the preparing and mailing, than it was worth.
Now they think they will have to rescind the vote buying tax exemptions for the municipal employees, teachers and seniors who use the most over the counter drugs.
If that doesn’t get them enough they will implement more taxes on other goods and services BUT they won’t increase the tax.
Again they don’t understand that people will alter their lifestyle to avoid paying any new tax. I was in New Hampshire last weekend, I drove through three of the State Liquor Store parking lots (no need to stop, I don’t drink) and the number of Ct. registered cars in the lots was an eye opener.

posted by: DirtyJobsGUy | April 29, 2014  10:45am

I keep a running tag on interesting job losses in CT.  I see that the former UTC Fuel Cell operation is probably closing (certainly in a severe bankruptcy) with about 200 job losses.  The state put plenty of money into this loser over the years.  Ovation guitar (the always interesting Charlie Kaman started this) is closing and moving out of state for about 100 jobs.  The insurance companies continue to bleed jobs (but under the veil of secrecy).

But our elected leaders cannot really control spending.  Eventually reality will catch up.

posted by: art vandelay | April 29, 2014  12:13pm

art vandelay

If one wants to see exactly how the economy is doing in this state, take a trip to your town hall.  There you will see an easel with all the homes being foreclosed on by the tax collectors office.  In my town the number is now 40 and climbing.

posted by: joemanc | April 29, 2014  12:23pm

Left unsaid in all this is that the legislature came back in to session last year because the budget was in deficit. Additionally, the state had a tax amnesty program that brought in much more than expected. Blaming this on the expiration of the Bush tax cuts is nonsense. This is all happening because the economy in CT is not good. Period.

Lawrence - your party rules Hartford…we’ll certainly remember in November.