Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 2:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »
Social Enterprise Trust Honors Entrepreneurs Who Hope to Change the World
Oct 28, 2014 11:51 pm
Entrepreneurs interested in making social changes across the world as well as growing their bottom line are an...more »

Our Partners

˜

Lawmakers Seek To Ban GMO Grass

by Hugh McQuaid | Mar 14, 2014 2:23pm
(7) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Agriculture

Hugh McQuaid Photo

Sen. Don Williams

Opponents of genetically modified organisms and pesticides are pushing to enact the first ever ban on GMO grass to prevent the development of pesticide-resistant “super weeds.”

“This is nothing less than an arms race of toxic chemicals aimed directly at the health of our people and the health of our environment,” Senate President Donald Williams said at a Friday press conference. “Once you start going down this road of relying more and more on toxic herbicides, you’re guaranteed to have to use stronger and stronger poisons as time goes on.”

Williams and other advocates are hoping to add language banning genetically modified grass seeds and genetically modified landscape plants to an existing bill, which would expand restrictions on using pesticides on school grounds and other public land.

This new effort represents a collaboration between people critical of pesticide usage and opponents of genetically modified organisms. The anti-GMO crowd mobilized last year and saw a legislative victory when Connecticut became the first state to take steps toward requiring labels on foods that contain GMOs.

Advocates are now concerned that agricultural companies are developing grass seeds to be “Roundup Ready.” That means the grass will be genetically designed to withstand more application of the popular weed-killing herbicide, which contains the chemical glyphosate.

“These are new products that are being field-tested right now. So they’re not on the market, which is why it’s so important for us to take action now,” Williams said. “Once they’re out there and they’re being sold and planted, and grass seeds are perennial, it will be very hard to reel that back.”

And if glyphosate resistant grass becomes prevalent, GMO Free Connecticut founder Tara Cook-Littman said people will dramatically increase their usage of the product, which will have negative impact on the environment and their health.

Hugh McQuaid Photo “Currently, people spot-treat on grass for weeds with Roundup. Can you imagine if GMO grass that’s resistant to glyphosate is sold directly to the consumer and now rather than spot treating for weeds, you can literally just paint the entire lawn?” she said.

Scotts Miracle-Gro is one of the lawn care companies developing genetically modified grass. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Agriculture concluded that the company’s strain of Kentucky bluegrass, which was designed to resist glyphosate, did not require federal regulation.

In a Tuesday phone interview, Scotts spokesman Lance Latham stressed that his company does not currently have a genetically modified grass seed on the market. But he said their development are part of the company’s longstanding efforts to create more resilient types of grass.

Latham said Scotts has been working for years to develop grass which requires less fertilizers and pesticides, is more resistant to drought, and does not need to be mowed as often. He said GMO grass seeds are an extension of that program.

“A ban on these products before they are developed seems a bit counter productive,” he said.

Advocates of the ban disagree. Bill Duesing of the Northeast Organic Farming Association said the genetically modified plants will return each year after they are planted and will spread over time. He said the grass will eventually impact organic farmers.

“As these seeds spread and more and more grass takes up that genetic trait, we’ll find organic farmers who want to grass feed their beef, can’t do it because their grass is genetically modified, which is prohibited in organic standards. GMOs are pollution with a life of its own,” he said.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(7) Comments

posted by: dano860 | March 14, 2014  2:44pm

Have they truly lost it?
Next you won’t be able to buy cotton clothing because it was grown on a GMO plant.Many States have been using a grass seed that requires less mowing. It doesn’t grow over 4” or 5” making it great for highways and parks.
Will somebody please go and shake some sense into these people?
I believe Round-up is one of the weed killers that becomes inert upon contact with dirt/ soil. It only works on actively growing plants.

posted by: mari | March 16, 2014  9:44am

Its not magic. Where on the container does it state biodegradable. With chemicals less is always better as eventually it migrates into the groundwater.

posted by: DirtyJobsGUy | March 16, 2014  12:26pm

Since the consensus science (Feds and others) shows no real risk from GMO plants as they are similar to all other cultivated stuff,  I guess these guys are “Anti-Science” (or have been abducted by aliens or broken into the medicinal pot locker)

posted by: dano860 | March 16, 2014  11:49pm

According to Wicki:
Glyphosate adsorbs strongly to soil and is not expected to move vertically below the six inch soil layer; residues are expected to be immobile in soil. Glyphosate is readily degraded by soil microbes to AMPA and carbon dioxide. Glyphosate and AMPA are not likely to move to ground water due to their strong adsorptive characteristics. However, glyphosate does have the potential to contaminate surface waters due to its aquatic use patterns and through erosion, as it adsorbs to soil particles suspended in runoff. If glyphosate reached surface water, it would not be broken down readily by water or sunlight. It would be diluted to a solution that would render it useless and unable to be identified.
What is at issue here, the seed that hasn’t been developed or the supposition that people MIGHT use more Roundup?
Emergency it’s not but there are real issues they could and should be dealing with. Don seems to be trying to pin his name onto some lack luster legislation, that’s one heck of a note to go out on.

posted by: James Cooper | March 17, 2014  3:32pm

Wouldn’t it be better to consult some actual scientists before passing silly laws like this? Who is giving you this misinformation.

posted by: Mark Holtman | March 29, 2014  5:54pm

Wake up people. There are hundreds of studies on the ill effects of glyphosate. It does not ‘degrade’. It enters our soils, our water systems as runoff and ultimately our cells. Thank God we have lawmakers interested in our well being.

posted by: Viriato77 | April 9, 2014  1:50pm

Mark, care to cite to those studies. And if you do, can you explain them in a way that proves you understand them and thought critically of them?