Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Video | iPhone 6 Review - Is it worth the upgrade?
Sep 20, 2014 8:26 am
The release of a new iPhone has almost become an Autumn holiday — especially for the hundreds of eager customers who more »
Hartford Entrepreneur is Crunching Numbers for the Greater Good
Sep 18, 2014 6:59 am
Data is vitally important to most nonprofits. It is a key component for seeking grant funds, gives a clear picture of...more »

Our Partners

˜

Leaders Try To Put Grass Seed Debate Behind Them

by Christine Stuart | Apr 18, 2014 7:17am
(2) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Agriculture, Environment, State Capitol

Hugh McQuaid file photo

House Speaker Brendan Sharkey

(Updated 1:28 p.m.) It’s been a week since the House, in a rare move, defeated a bill that would have banned genetically modified grass seed just one day after the Senate passed it.

The bill was a priority for outgoing Senate President Donald Williams, who believes he must stop the modified grass seed before it gets to market. But he failed to communicate that to House Speaker Brendan Sharkey, who had concerns about taking such a drastic step. Sharkey said he was never consulted by Williams about the bill.

Instead of waiting, Sharkey put the issue out of its misery quickly last Thursday when the House voted down the measure by a 103-37 vote.

On Thursday, lobbyists for Scotts Miracle-Gro delivered letters to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, Sharkey, Williams, and Republican leaders Lawrence Cafero and John McKinney.

Scotts CEO Jim Hagedorn wanted to clarify some of the statements that were made during last week’s debate on the bill and invited University of Connecticut scientists to join a consortium of turf scientists to help test the grass seed.

“In terms of offering genetically modified seed for commercial sale in Connecticut, I see no scenario under which this would occur before 2017, and only then based on the continued findings from our research,” Hagedorn wrote.

The letter opens the door to the two-year moratorium the Senate Republicans offered as an amendment to the bill last week. But proponents of the ban have expressed the desire for the moratorium to last five years.

In the meantime, lawmakers and lobbyists with interests beyond genetically modified grass are worried about the relationship between Sharkey and Williams because it could impede the flow of business in the final few weeks of the legislative session.

CTNJ file photo

Sen. President Donald Williams

Asked about the relationship Thursday, Williams said, “I’m not going to comment on that.”

Pressed about whether the Senate would take up House bills or if he was concerned about Senate bills that needed to make it through the House, Williams said, “I’m not going to speculate on that either.”

So there’s no tension between you and Sharkey?

“I’m not going to comment on that as well,” Williams said.

Asked the same question, Sharkey said they both recognize there’s important work to do “and that we’re going to move in a positive direction to make that happen.”

“I don’t see any reason why we wouldn’t be able to get done everything we need to get done this year,” Sharkey said.

On Friday, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said he’s spoken with both Williams and Sharkey.

“I’ve urged them to communicate more frequently so that mishaps or disagreement don’t take place and cloud the remainder of the session,” Malloy said. “There’s too much important work to be done.”

He said he received a “good response” from both of the leaders.

Sen. Minority Leader John McKinney, R-Fairfield, said at the end of the day, even though he had strong disagreements with both Williams and Sharkey on policies they want to see passed, he thinks they will be able to put aside their differences and “whatever personally upset them with the GMO bill.”

He said this isn’t the first time there’s been disagreements over bills within the same party or between the two chambers.

“I don’t think this is the first time it’s happened,” McKinney said. “And it probably won’t be the last.”

However, he did agree that it was unusual for the House to defeat a bill the Senate had passed less than 24 hours earlier. He agreed with the decision Sharkey made to take action on the bill instead of letting the issue linger.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(2) Comments

posted by: emilywaitress | April 18, 2014  8:13am

The senate should get the hint and start approving all those things they are completely against.  Then the house will come along and shoot them down on principle even though it is what they really want.  What I want is a state government that lets the future in with Freedom not restrictions.  I support GMO EVERYTHING.  I support the human race above everything.

posted by: Jmpr143 | April 21, 2014  12:45pm

In reply to emilywaitress’ comment..you support EVERYTHING GMO?  Do you have a death wish??  It’s poison, not only to humans, but to plant and wildlife as well. Perhaps you need to do more indepth research.  Get the truth about GMO’s..I believe you’ll change your mind.