Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Nonprofit Promotes Safety Online With Two-Step Campaign
Aug 19, 2014 12:20 pm
Convenience is the enemy when it comes to staying safe online. That’s why a nonprofit organization was spreading...more »
VIDEO: Hartford Event to Focus on Online Safety August 18
Aug 16, 2014 12:24 pm
The National Cyber Security Alliance (NCSA) is hosting a free event at the Connecticut Science Center at 9:00 a.m....more »

Our Partners

˜

Malloy Moves Off Start Date For Teacher Evaluations

by Christine Stuart | Apr 23, 2012 11:30am
(7) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Education

Christine Stuart file photo

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman

He’s often painted as someone who’s inflexible, but Gov. Dannel P. Malloy may be proving some of his toughest critics wrong as he moves toward delaying one of the more controversial pieces of his education reform proposal.

Liz Donohue, Malloy’s director of public policy, said Friday that the administration plans to delay the tethering evaluations to teacher tenure for one year. The delay will follow a 10-district pilot program and will come a year after local school boards have had a chance to review the guidelines expected to be issued by the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council at the end of June.

The timeline outlined by the administration Friday is more in line with what the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council and the legislature’s Education Committee recommended.

In an interview Friday, Donohue said the administration has always been “flexible” on the start date. But they remain insistent that evaluations have consequences.

“Evaluations have to have consequences and what those consequences are is subject to discussions,” Roy Occhiogrosso, Malloy’s senior communications adviser, said Friday. “The governor has always said having evaluations that aren’t tied to anything is unacceptable.”

Occhiogrosso described the administration, which is in closed door negotiations with both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, as flexible when it comes to evaluations, certification, funding of charter schools, and the commissioner’s network for low performing schools.

“Each one of those items is open to discussions,” Occhiogrosso said.

The 10-district pilot program will begin this July and will cost about $2.5 million. It was part of Malloy’s budget released on Feb. 8.

The Connecticut Education Association has expressed concern that the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council, which is involved in creating the pilot, hasn’t met since Feb. 6.

“With no meeting schedule set, it may be almost impossible for PEAC to complete the work that needs to be done before a meaningful pilot program can even be conducted,” CEA’s President Phil Apruzzese and Executive Director Mary Loftus Levine wrote in an April 5 letter to Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor.

In an email late Friday afternoon Malloy’s Chief of Staff Mark Ojakian reiterated the administration’s position on the issue of tying evaluations to teacher tenure.

“We indicated previously during our meetings with labor leaders and other stakeholders — meetings that occurred prior to the Education Committee’s vote on a substitute bill — that there was flexibility in the effective date of our proposal to tie consequences to the evaluation system,” he said.

The negotiations continue and Rep. Andrew Fleischmann, co-chairman of the legislature’s Education Committee, said he has stopped talking about the meetings as of April 18. He declined comment on this latest development Friday evening outside the House chamber.

“We continue to negotiate in good faith with legislative leaders,” Ojakian said. “We believe that we can reach a deal. We look forward to continuing those conversations in the days ahead.”

On Friday, many legislators also were learning for the first time that Malloy was holding separate meetings with the Republican minority.

House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero, R-Norwalk, applauded Malloy for his “shuttle” diplomacy.

“Republicans have made the case for a series of principles that must be included in the final legislation in order to land our support for significant education reform, from teacher tenure reform to enhanced charter school programs,” Cafero said. “Based on the negotiations to date, we believe we are close to a deal very soon.”

But rank-and-file Republican and Democratic lawmakers privately made statements that they’re not going to throw their teachers under the bus just to get a deal.

The Appropriations Committee is expected to take up the education reform legislation Monday morning. With a more than $141-million budget deficit estimated, it’s unclear whether Malloy’s $128-million education reform proposal will be pared back.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(7) Comments

posted by: DirtyJobsGUy | April 23, 2012  11:50am

Who?  Whom?  Not the citizens.  The unions own the government lock, stock and barrel.

posted by: TerryW | April 23, 2012  5:00pm

The 10-district pilot program will begin this July and will cost about $2.5 million. It was part of Malloy’s budget released on Feb. 8.

If it is going to take 2.5 million to pilot this plan with only 10 districts, how much would it have taken to implement it for the entire state?

It doesn’t sound like: 1. they were even ready to do it and 2. that they had the funds to implement this for all towns/districts starting in 3 months. 

Did Malloy just realize what was inevitable and then concede? He certainly did not portray himself as flexible despite your introduction.

Actually, he was quite the opposite whenever he spoke. Maybe he realizes he has no choice, both financially and in terms of support.

Although he was definitely willing to throw ALL teachers under the bus, not all legislators agreed with him.

Note to Dannel: you are not always correct in your assumptions. You have made plenty of mistakes while rolling out your plan (written by ?? Leeds Global?? Pryor’s “consultant”)

I believe you only won this election by about 3,000 votes….43,000 teachers in CT…enough said. One and Done! Never again!

posted by: Speak up | April 23, 2012  5:13pm

The Appropriations Committee is expected to take up the education reform legislation Monday morning. With a more than $141-million budget deficit estimated, it’s unclear whether Malloy’s $128-million education reform proposal will be pared back.

Well, if the deficit is that much or even more, will he use that as the excuse why he can’t move forward with SB 24 or will he just blame the teachers and their unions?

Interesting to see how he spins this when there isnt’ enough money.

When he can’t open as many charter schools and we don’t get the NCLB waiver (who wants to be blackmailed by Duncan anyway?), just wait…he will blame that on the teachers/unions too.

posted by: ConcernedVoter | April 23, 2012  5:25pm

I’m glad that Malloy is now willing to test out some of his ideas concerning evaluation. Intelligent people usually test first, and then make a hypothesis.  Malloy started with hair-brained schemes.  Hmmm….so why is he interested in research now?  Now he is willing to “compromise”?  Too bad he didn’t start off this way. Certainly looks like back-tracking…

posted by: Linda12 | April 24, 2012  7:02am

Flexible? Talking out of both sides?

“By the way,” he said, after describing those elements in his original bill, “just about everything I said” has been “gutted.”

Please read:

http://www.courant.com/news/education/hc-education-malloy-0424-20120423,0,1395742.story

posted by: DanEd | April 24, 2012  10:11am

TerryW you are exactly correct on all points.  Gov. Malloy seems sure that the State would have a budget surplus when all was said and done.  It looks like we will have a deficit. What else is he wrong about?  Certainly, what is best for schools and students.

posted by: Adamec | April 24, 2012  10:39am

It all comes down to the votes.

If the Governor is now being “flexible” there is only one reason.

The intent apparently hasn’t changed. Reality has simply intruded itself.