CT News Junkie | Malloy Outlines Budget Rules, Close To $2B In Cuts Planned

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

Malloy Outlines Budget Rules, Close To $2B In Cuts Planned

by | Jan 25, 2011 2:49pm
() Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Labor, State Budget

Christine Stuart photo

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy laid out a more detailed framework Tuesday for how he’s approaching the state’s budget deficit. He’s already said he can’t do it with just spending cuts or just tax increases, but he tipped his hand by saying he’s looking for close to $2 billion in spending cuts.

Malloy’s budget isn’t due until Feb. 16, but up until today he’s remained fairly vague about how he plans on closing a $3.67 billion budget deficit.

At a meeting of more than 50 various state agency heads, Malloy announced he plans on spending no more than this year’s current services budget, which is about $17.95 billion. That means Malloy is working on cutting $1.88 billion in programmatic increases built into last year’s budget.

But for those who follow budget politics, it may not be news since Malloy was always aware he would have to cut about $1.5 billion in order to stay under the statutory spending cap. The spending cap, which was put in place in 1991 the same year the income tax was first implemented, caps the amount of spending the state can do based on the amount of revenue it receives.

“What I’m trying to do is move the state into a position where it can compete with other states and into a position where we’re sustainable,“ Malloy said.

Cutting $1.88 billion in spending is his best estimate at the moment of what the state needs to cut in order to live within its means, he said.

Malloy also said he will not be going to the bond market to borrow money for salaries and operating expenses, and he will fund the states pension liabilities.

Last year, then-Gov. M. Jodi Rell and the coalition of state labor unions agreed to delay about $350 million in pension obligations in an effort to balance the state budget. But Malloy sees that as a budget gimmick he won’t use.

Thirdly, Malloy said there will be no early retirement incentive program offered to state employees. Click here to read more about that.

The severity of the spending cuts could put Malloy at odds with lawmakers in his own party, but Sen. President Donald Williams said Tuesday that he doesn’t think that’s true.

He said when the national economic crisis started lawmakers were able to find $3 billion in spending cuts. Two years later, without a meaningful recovery, Williams said he thinks his party is in agreement with the governor over what needs to be done.

Malloy declined to comment on the legislative agenda presented by Republican leadership earlier in the afternoon because he had not seen the proposal and was not there to hear about it. He has met with Republican leadership from the House and the Senate and said he welcomes their ideas.

“They have an important role to play,” Malloy said.

House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero and Senate Minority Leader John McKinney said their priority first and foremost is to reduce the size and scope of state government.

Click here to read their entire proposal.

Most of the proposal focused on cutting the state’s workforce and requiring employees and legislative staff to contribute more to their health care and pension benefits. However, those items are not under the purview of the legislature and would need to be negotiated by Malloy and the coalition of labor unions, but the current contract for everything but salaries goes through 2017. That means both sides, the governor and the unions, would need to agree to open the contract in order for any changes to be made.

Republicans also proposed consolidating 43 state agencies into 11 and repealing the corporate tax, while also creating a $400 tax credit for companies that hire people off the unemployment rolls.

“I have never hidden my desire to see a fair amount of consolidation,” Malloy said Tuesday.

Tags: , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comments

(9) Archived Comments

posted by: belltor | January 25, 2011  7:33pm

Clearly, Malloy will need republican votes to advance his cuts and that is probably what it will take to pass 2 billion in cuts in state services.

As for not offering early retirements, Malloy is just taking care of the union bosses that want to hold onto dues paying members.

posted by: ... | January 25, 2011  11:08pm

...

I agree with much of this and I hope Malloy will take some of it to heart. Namely the Following:

10% cut to all legislators and elected officials for 2 years.

Freeze salary raises for all for 2 years.

Implementing GAAP.

Reducing managers and the scope of government (maybe not as extreme (48-11), but perhaps down to 30 or 20). But that is another issue.

And many more. But this proposal is strong so that they will get a fair amount, otherwise they would get nothing and those who see Malloy as a caricature because of a letter next to his name would be correct. But he is not that, and we must ask better of him, and of our entire government. To work for less, sometimes with less, but for a greater good.

posted by: Disgruntled | January 26, 2011  8:55am

Not increasing is not the same as making actual cuts.
Dan has stepped in it and now the residents of Connecticut get to clean the mess up with higher taxes and a lower standard of living.
Now or later.

posted by: ... | January 26, 2011  9:54am

...

Glad to see you back on the discussion board Disgruntled.

posted by: City Hall Watch | January 26, 2011  3:19pm

For the last seven years, the state budget has grown, monstrously so in some years. What we have is a fat, bloated government. Malloy’s plan to flat fund that bloated mess is not a cut. It’s still feeding the beast. Write another story when “Danell” gets around to real cuts.

posted by: hawkeye | January 26, 2011  8:42pm

City Hall Watch: Hopefully, Gov. Malloy will implement a total, budget reduction plan, rather than a cosmetic one.  He must get serious, or “we will be robbing Peter, to pay Paul!”

posted by: Disgruntled | January 28, 2011  1:00pm

“Emerging from yet another snow storm, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy called on state residents Thursday to clear off the fresh accumulation, before the next one.”

That is how you can expect the fiscal mess to be cleaned up by The Nutmeg King.
Me? I am heading up to the parkway with my snow shovel to do my civic duty.

posted by: GoatBoyPHD | January 28, 2011  4:39pm

GoatBoyPHD

$2 Billion is fairly steep.

Realistically about as good as the GOP can hope for in a two-year budget.

Now we get to where the rubber hits the road. Will Malloy cut personnel rather than services and expect the same level of service delivery for two years. That would mean larger classrooms, concentrating on significant imnspections permitting and enforcemnt, and jailing violent prisoners rather than non-violent.

Local police would concentrate more on violent crime than quality of life crimes (parking, speeding and local DWI enforcement).

posted by: belltor | January 31, 2011  11:42am

Someone might want to ask Gov. Malloy why he offered three separate early retirements to Stamford city employees over the course of his mayorship if he doesn’t think they save money?