CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Malloy Says He Won’t Support Charter School Moratorium

by | Mar 21, 2015 12:50pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Education, State Budget, Bridgeport

Evan Lips / New Haven Register photo A day after a public hearing on a bill that would place a two-year moratorium on new charter schools, Democratic Gov. Dannel P Malloy said he wouldn’t support it.

“I wouldn’t support a moratorium of the creation of any kind of public school,” Malloy said Friday at an unrelated press conference.

The governor took a firm stance against a legislative initiative to slow the growth of charter schools in the state following a scandal at a now-defunct charter management organization, the Family Urban School of Excellence (FUSE). That charter organization ran schools in Hartford and sought to operate a school in Bridgeport when it was reported that the head of the organization had been convicted of embezzlement and didn’t hold a doctorate, contrary to how he portrayed himself on his resume.

The legislature’s Education Committee filed a bill last week that seeks to repeal a portion of the general statutes governing charter schools and specifically would require the state Board of Education to halt the approval of new charter schools after July 1, “until the Commission[er] of Education develops a comprehensive statewide charter school plan and conducts a review of charter schools in existence.”

The plan would have to be submitted by Feb. 1, 2017, and would be subject to review by a “joint standing committee of the General Assembly.”

But Malloy’s budget proposal dedicates the dollars necessary to fund both grade growth in existing charters and two new charter schools in Bridgeport and Stamford. His budget includes $12 million in 2016 for 1,250 new charter school seats and $7.9 million in 2017 for 612 more charter school seats.

“I think you open schools when you need to open them for any number of purposes,” Malloy said Friday, and added that the state should honor the commitments it has made to these schools.

But the head of one of the state’s teacher unions, who endorsed Malloy’s re-election bid, said she’s concerned because it “sounds like we’re more interested in putting profits before practical policy.”

Melodie Peters, president of AFT Connecticut, told the legislature’s Education Committee on Thursday that the state should take some time to look at developing a comprehensive statewide policy regarding all public schools, including charters.

“If we really want to do this and we want to do this right — there is no reason we can’t put the brakes on for a couple of years,” Peters said.

Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford, said she supports the creation of a statewide plan because, in the absence of any plan, the people with “the most support” have been able to push for increases in funding.

“We might be helping a hundred kids here, which is awesome, but slowly hurting a thousand kids in a system because of that,” Bye, who is the co-chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, said.

Bye said she’s seen the power of organizations “and the power of marketing can outweigh a good reasoned plan that has input from all stakeholders.” Her comments were made a day before a coalition of groups in favor of increasing funding for charter schools unveiled a new digital advertising campaign featuring charter students talking about how much they love their schools.

Bye said there’s been a 1,400 percent increase in charter funding over the past 12 years, a 1,600 percent increase in magnet school funding, and only a 60 percent increase in the Education Cost Sharing grant to public schools.

Charter school organizations testified against the legislation Thursday. They said it wouldn’t be fair to the 3,600 students on wait lists trying to attend these schools.

Jennifer Alexander, CEO of Connecticut Coalition for Achievement Now, said the proposal is about pressing pause on charter school expansion, but “no parent can afford to press pause on their child’s education.”

She said the proposal would “stifle innovation” and “choice” for some of the state’s poorest students.

Dacia Toll, co-CEO and president of Achievement First, which operates charter schools in Hartford, New Haven, and Bridgeport, said 86 percent of charter elementary schools and 83 percent of charter high schools outperform their host district on statewide tests.

“Connecticut’s charter schools have a very strong track record of serving in particular low-income students,“ Toll said.

She said there’s an implication that charter schools in the state “have grown out of control,” when there have been charter schools in the state for 20 years. She said there are 22 public charter schools in the state currently.

“Given the magnitude of the need one can argue that we have extraordinarily underinvested in the strongest group of schools serving low-income students in the state,” Toll said.

But a handful of Bridgeport parents testified in support of a moratorium because they believe the five charter schools in their city are taking resources away from their children.

Sauda Baracca, a member of the Bridgeport Board of Education, said the district is growing and the charters are taking resources away from the roughly 22,000 public school students.

Asked about the tension between the Bridgeport school board and charter schools in that city, Baracca said it’s “not tension. It’s money, funding, dollars.”

Bridgeport parent Dennis Bradley testified that the state allocated almost $30 million to Bridgeport’s five charter schools at the same time Bridgeport Public Schools lost $2.8 million dollars in funding.

However, Toll said the funding argument doesn’t hold water.

“Under current law the children who attend charter schools are effectively double funded,” Toll testified. She said the districts receive money for the charter students even though the students are not attending the public school.

The district is still responsible for the cost of transporting the charter school students. Also, it’s up to the district and the charter school to negotiate special education costs for certain students. Toll said the districts are not fully funding their obligation to give charter schools money for the special education students attending charter schools.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comments

(9) Archived Comments

posted by: ocoandasoc | March 21, 2015  2:31pm

Sorry, teachers unions. But the Governor doesn’t need your support anymore, either. (But cheer up, you still own the legislature!)

posted by: Bethy | March 22, 2015  12:11pm

Bethy

I AGREE WITH THE GOVERNOR THAT HE SHOULD NOT SUPPORT THIS!!! BUT “MY PERSONAL” THOUGHT IS I DON’T LIKE THE FACT THAT CHURCH LEADERS AND CERTAIN POLITICIANS PULL STRINGS TO GET THEIR FRIENDS KIDS IN THE CHARTER SCHOOLS WHILE THOUSANDS OF OTHER INNER-CITY YOUTH LAG BEHIND AND ARE TREATED UNEQUAL! THIS IS “MY PERSONAL THOUGHT” ... NOT THE GOVERNOR’S!! HE HAS IS OWN STATEMENTS!

posted by: SocialButterfly | March 22, 2015  2:32pm

Everything is not equally fair as the school districts are not fully funding their obligations to give charters schools money for the costly special education students attending charter schools.

posted by: Noteworthy | March 22, 2015  11:08pm

Malloy won’t support a moratorium on charter schools - ok. How about a moratorium on paying twice for every charter student? Can we agree that pretending that phantom children are occupying public school seats, and paying for those kids when they’re really in charter schools and the state is paying for that too - is just plain stupid?

posted by: Bluecoat | March 23, 2015  5:17am

So how much money is Achieve, Inc., dumping into the DNC, or State Democrat Party Machine? Anyone know? Funny how Collectivists love Big Evil Businesses, when they are funding their slush funds.

posted by: johnboy1 | March 23, 2015  1:31pm

so many dems he does not need the teachers union vote anymore?? Wow

posted by: Truth_To_Power | March 23, 2015  4:36pm

I believe this is the first honest and objective statement from Bethy, in which she confirms that our public education system is subpar.

She states “I DON’T LIKE THE FACT THAT CHURCH LEADERS AND CERTAIN POLITICIANS PULL STRINGS TO GET THEIR FRIENDS KIDS IN THE CHARTER SCHOOLS…....”.

This of course begs the question - why do so many try to steer their kids away from public schools?

But Bethy answers that for us in her statement “.....WHILE THOUSANDS OF OTHER INNER-CITY YOUTH LAG BEHIND AND ARE TREATED UNEQUAL!”

Thank you bethy. Yes, children in public schools - from the inner-city or otherwise - DO lag behind and they ARE treated unequally.

Thanks Bethy. Nice to see you on the ‘right side of history’

posted by: SocialButterfly | March 23, 2015  7:18pm

@Bethy: You appear to have detected “some-insider-hankey-pankey.”

posted by: Dean2030 | March 24, 2015  6:17pm

Charter schools are bad:
1. They add to segregation already created by town lines.  Avon and Glastonbury still perform better than charter schools due to lack of poverty.
2. Some are for profit which is unacceptable.
3.They try to avoid state reporting which may allow for discriminatory practices towards students in need.
4. They have reported higher suspension rates than public schools especially with younger children. (Which is probably why they no longer wish to report)
5. They do not address the main causes of struggling schools which is poverty, drug use, students with PTSD, broken families, abuse, and unsafe neighborhoods.
6.  They are not accountable the same way public school’s are.  Charter school kids have family support to want to be in school.  Public schools have limited ways to compel truant students to show up to school.
Charter schools help kids get out of tough environments set up by segregating and discriminatory housing policies, but it does not solve the problem.  Others who support charters don’t like teachers unions and how their pay drive up taxes.  Switching to charters would not change that.  It would just mean less money for teachers and more for executives like every other industry.

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

Sponsored Messages