Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

Malloy Still Mum On Where He Plans To Cut Budget

by Hugh McQuaid | Nov 26, 2012 5:35pm
(9) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: State Budget, Special Session, Taxes

Hugh McQuaid Photo

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy

Following a Monday stop at a state agency headquarters, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy called the state’s projected budgetary woes a manageable problem and insisted his administration was taking steps to address it in a transparent fashion.

The state has known since just after the election that it likely has a budget deficit on its hands. A consensus revenue report from two separate non-partisan fiscal offices found that tax revenues have lagged by $128.1 million less than what was budgeted. And with greater than expected enrollment in Medicaid, the budget is on track to end the fiscal year $365 million in the red.

The governor, visiting the Department of Developmental Services’ Hartford headquarters, compared the shortfall to the close to $20 billion total state budget.

“When you put it in the context of $20 billion we’re not talking about a gigantic problem, we’re talking about a problem that is entirely manageable. That’s why we’re being transparent about it and we’re going to do it,” Malloy said.

Malloy has ruled out raising taxes and on Monday said he’s not inclined to layoff the small population of state workers who aren’t guaranteed layoff protection by the 2011 state employee benefit concession package.

That means he will need to cut spending. Malloy has some authority to cut from the budget directly. The governor can cut 5 percent of any appropriation and 3 percent of any fund in a financial crisis without legislative approval. But to close a $365 million shortfall, he’s going to need lawmakers to approve further spending reductions.

Lawmakers are likely to convene a special legislative session before Christmas to address the budget. Malloy said he expects the process to be bipartisan.

“I can’t say what each member’s response will be but I think there’s an appreciation by Republican and Democratic legislative leadership that we need to get this done, that it should be gotten done sooner rather than later,” Malloy said. 

Legislative leaders on both sides of the aisle have issued statements indicating they would like to move quickly to right the state’s fiscal course. But Republicans have also been critical of Malloy and the Democrats, who they charge haven’t been transparent. During the last legislative session, they voted to move the revenue report, typically released in October, until after the election.

Democrats said they moved the date so the report would reflect a more accurate financial picture. Republicans argued it was to avoid fiscal accountability during the election.

Though he accused the governor of being less than transparent last week, House Republican leader Lawrence Cafero seemed eager to work with Democrats to close the shortfall.

“A special session dedicated to dealing with the state’s deficit of $365 million for the current fiscal year can be efficient and organized if we get Democrats and Republicans and their respective staffs to work together ahead of time,” he said last week in a statement. “It need not be a protracted session with hours of debate if there is a cooperative effort ahead of time.’‘

Malloy said to expect details of his deficit mitigation plan soon, starting with what he has the authority to cut.

“I’ll take the lead in announcing rescissions so people know we’re finding the dollars that we can contribute to this within our organizations and not requiring statutory action but the legislature doesn’t give us a lot of rescission authority,” he said. 

Some of those cuts could come from the Developmental Services Department, where Malloy helped launch the agency’s new mission statement Monday. After thanking the staff and reading proclamation during the ceremony, the governor acknowledged DDS will need to find ways to deliver services in less expensive ways.

“I think everyone will be asked to contribute to savings. That’s a reality, that’s why we’re out in front of this thing and transparency will be really important,” Malloy said. 

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(9) Comments

posted by: state_employee | November 26, 2012  8:06pm

This is a joke.  He is the LEAST transparent governor in the history of Connecticut.  Is he really that arrogant?  He must think people are really stupid.

posted by: Reasonable | November 26, 2012  8:53pm

Gov. Malloy “was not mum”—in announcing his many planned avenues of taxation after he was elected.
And he gave us massive taxation—but kept on spending.  No surprise that we now have a massive budget deficit that is climbing.  With his blind Democratic General Assembly crew—“we have the blind leading the blind!”  Don’t count on t his bunch to cut our budget, “as they won’t touch the unions or the voters with benefits who elect them.”

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | November 27, 2012  1:02am

He’s right that the current shortfall is manageable. I’m no fan of his, but this is easy business, this money can be found in the couch cushions. The next biennium is the challenge, cities and towns have got to get ready to have the trough pulled out from under them.

HST

posted by: Reasonable | November 27, 2012  11:02am

Dr.HunterSThompson:  You say that the current shortfall is manageable—so you expect the current Democratic leadership who got us into this mess to manage it?  Start drinking a milder tea. Your strong Democratic party allegiance is making you delusional, HST.

posted by: redlady | November 27, 2012  11:39am

Ruling out not raising taxes? Face it, Malloy and Co., it’s the spending!

This will bear watching very closely. We heard many promises of cutting spending when the 77 new taxes and the First Five went into gear - it hasn’t materialized yet. Will it ever?

posted by: JAM | November 27, 2012  6:27pm

Citing the context of a $20 billion budget is simply the wrong frame of reference. Major portions of the budget ( debt service, state employees costs, etc.) are off limits. When you put the $365 million in the “context” of the discretionary portion of the budget, the problem becomes a lot tougher.

posted by: THREEFIFTHS | November 27, 2012  9:49pm

Cutting through the B.S.  and perceptions of modern society politics.
I recently watched The Godfather trilogy and to be honest there didn’t seem to be much difference between the Mafia and the political system. The system creates the llusion of democracy but at the end of the day all we get is the choice between 2 parties of gangsters. Both systems will punish you if you don’t abide by their rules.Taxation is really just another form of the Mafia protection system.

posted by: gutbomb86 | November 27, 2012  10:31pm

gutbomb86

@threefifths - the gov’t is nothing like the mafia. Not in any way whatsoever. You’re tainted by a bitter perspective.

posted by: ALD | November 28, 2012  1:08pm

“When you put the $365 million in the “context” of the discretionary portion of the budget, the problem becomes a lot tougher.”

JAM, Your 100% correct.  There is a pretty big GAAP between the part of our budget that is fixed and the part Malloy can cut.  So contrary to the thinking of some here, this is no small problem.

Given that Malloy and co have continued to mismanage the spending after they “shared sacrificed” us all into a pretty small corner, is just beyond comprehension.