Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 2:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »
Social Enterprise Trust Honors Entrepreneurs Who Hope to Change the World
Oct 28, 2014 11:51 pm
Entrepreneurs interested in making social changes across the world as well as growing their bottom line are an...more »

Our Partners

˜

Murphy Battles Super Pollutants

by Jhansi Katechia | Jul 8, 2014 11:31am
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Energy, Environment, Milford

Jhansi Katechia photo

Sen. Chris Murphy listens to environmental advocates

Sen. Chris Murphy joined advocates last week in Milford to discuss his bipartisan legislation to reduce “super pollutants.”

The Super Pollutants Act of 2014 is a bipartisan bill introduced by Murphy and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, last week. The proposal is aimed at reducing emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs), referred to as “super pollutants.”

These super pollutants are non-carbon dioxide greenhouse pollutants and can come from a variety of places, such as landfills, refrigerators, air conditioners, diesel engines, and cookstoves.

Super pollutants stay in the atmosphere for a relatively short amount of time, but they are responsible for around 40 percent of global warming, making them the second-largest contributor after carbon dioxide.

For example, methane is emitted into the air from leaking landfills and oil and gas exploration, and black carbon is emitted in the form of soot from diesel engines and traditional cookstoves. The legislation seeks to mitigate the release of these waste products by working with a variety of federal agencies.

“If I stopped emitting black carbon, it’d be gone in a year or two. If you turned off sources for methane, it would be gone in 10 years,” Director of Yale Climate and Energy Institute Mark Pagani said, adding that the timeframe makes it a short-term project.

“These are pollutants that comprise about 40 percent of total global warming capacity,” Murphy said.

While President Obama and the Congress focus on their plan to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, Murphy believes that dramatic reduction of the super pollutants can help to slow climate warming.

The bill seeks to reduce SLCP’s by regulating federal agencies and their adoption of SLCP-reducing technologies and strategies.

“Government agencies are big consumers of refrigeration and air conditioning, and big users of gas and oil,” Murphy said. “The government has jurisdiction across these agencies.”

State Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, sees the gas flaring from wells in North Dakota as an opportunity to restrict the gas emissions. Murphy hopes that this will be part of what this super pollutant legislation will cover.

“We’re trying to push the state of technologies in different places on this issue,” United Technologies Chief Sustainability Officer John M. Mandyck said.

Mandyck explained that United Technologies has been making strides with refrigeration in supermarkets and marine container refrigeration, which is used on ships that transport food via ship. Mandyck said that where there are alternatives available, they should be using them.

“We don’t have alternatives in every area — the science just isn’t there yet. So we have to be practical about the way we want to approach this and this bill does that,” Mandyck said.

While Murphy was unable to quantify the exact impact of the legislation, he believes that it will reduce the growing issues of global warming.

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(5) Comments

posted by: Joebigjoe | July 8, 2014  7:21pm

Super pollutants? Are these super duper pollutants or just really really bad pollutants.

Since global warming is mentioned and I am not totally sold, but remain open to be convinced, did anyone see 60 Minutes on the volcanoes on Sunday? Those babies seem to be polluting the air with alot of garbage and ash, so how do we not know that they’re not the cause? We cant measure the volume of what they kick out and Iceland as a big culprit is closer to the North Pole than the rest of the industrialized world.

posted by: Bill Dunne | July 9, 2014  3:51pm

Jhansi, I take it that you’re a reporter.  How do you know this statement is true and factual?:  “Super pollutants stay in the atmosphere for a relatively short amount of time, but they are responsible for around 40 percent of global warming, making them the second-largest contributor after carbon dioxide.” Don’t be a tool. Try to be just a tiny bit skeptical.

posted by: Bluecoat | July 9, 2014  4:37pm

To all, the Best Place to get real “Climate Data” is Anthony Watts’ webstie: www.wattsupwiththat.com

Here is an excellent guest post form the site:
<http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/04/message-to-the-president-data-shows-co2-reduction-is-futile>

posted by: shinningstars122 | July 9, 2014  6:07pm

shinningstars122

Methane concentrations are a concern from both man made and natural sources.

This article gives you a basic working understand of three many sources.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-is-there-more-methane-in-the-atmosphere/


One issue that is related to this is the levels of ground ozone, which guess what climate deniers, is harmful.

This shows you in real time what areas of the country are experiencing moderate to high levels.

If you wonder why Wyoming and North Dakota are experiencing higher level than the megalopolis…its due to hydraulic fracturing and the thousand of diesel generators that run 24/7 polluting the air.
http://www.airnow.gov/#tabs-2

posted by: QuestionMark | July 10, 2014  8:33pm

Murphy is using this topic strictly for his frequent expert political grandstanding
purposes when he claims “this will reduce THE GROWING “ISSUE” OF GLOBAL WARMING “but won’t say it will reduce global warming itself.” He has a flair for political rhetoric that skirts a definitive answer on his part.