Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Video Interview: Astronaut Rick Mastracchio Reflects on his 6 Month Mission to the Space Station
May 20, 2014 10:22 am
NASA granted CTTechJunkie the opportunity for a short interview with Astronaut Rick Mastracchio, who is readjusting to...more »
ANALYSIS | Connecticut Astronaut Arrives Home on Russian Soyuz to Uncertain Political Environment
May 13, 2014 11:40 pm
Astronaut and Waterbury native Rick Mastracchio landed safely aboard a Russian Soyuz capsule at 9:58 p.m. EST Tuesday...more »

Our Partners

˜

Lucky 2013? No Hurricanes Yet, But The Season Is Not Over

by Emily Boushee | Sep 24, 2013 5:30am
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Weather

Douglas Healey file photo The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted this year’s hurricane season would be even worse than last year with the likelihood of 13 to 20 named storms. It was predicted that 7 to 11 of those could become hurricanes.

“These ranges are well above the seasonal average of 12 named storms, six hurricanes and three major hurricanes,” NOAA analysts predicted in May. But so far this year there have been nine named storms and two hurricanes — none of which have been major.

The state of Connecticut, which is still cleaning up from Hurricane Sandy, has been lucky so far this year as no major storms have yet struck the region. That’s left many wondering how the weather experts could have gotten it so wrong.

Douglas Glowacki, Connecticut’s weather adviser, said that predicting weather for an entire season is a difficult task, much harder and much less accurate than a standard one- or two-day weather forecast.

He said there are three major factors that have contributed to the lack of hurricanes this season. The first is wind shear created by tropical activity in the Eastern Pacific. The tropical activity usually ends in the first half of August, but Glowacki said its continuance has created a wind shear that has prevented strong hurricanes from forming.

The second factor is a fairly active northern jet stream that creates fronts that sweep over the Atlantic and tend to create more wind shear and push storms away from the U.S. coast.

The third factor is that the Atlantic waters did not warm up as much as meteorologists had expected, Glowacki said. Warm ocean water provides energy to hurricanes and without this heat, hurricanes and tropical storms lose much of their intensity.

The combination of these factors has resulted in quite a few tropical storms, but only two hurricanes, Humberto and Ingrid, neither of which has impacted Connecticut. In terms of tropical storms, this season is approaching normal with nine named storms. So although this hurricane season is nearly average in terms of storm frequency, it is far below average regarding overall storm power, Glowacki said last week.

But that doesn’t mean residents can become complacent. Hurricane season doesn’t officially end until November.

Connecticut Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security spokesman Scott Devico warned that “it is important to note that residents cannot let their guard down. It only takes one storm to have a devastating impact on the state.”

The first half of a hurricane season has no bearing on how storm-ridden the remainder of the season may be, Glowacki said. Simply because the first half of this hurricane season has been relatively uneventful does not necessarily translate to a tame second half of the season. Chance plays a large role in determining storms, as it did with Hurricane Sandy.

NOAA screengrab “Sandy is one of those storms that formed at exactly the wrong time at exactly the wrong place,” Glowacki said.

For any given storm that occurs in the Atlantic, Connecticut has about a three percent chance of being impacted and for any given year the state has about a 10 percent chance of being impacted by a hurricane. Hurricane Gloria, which devastated the state in 1985, was the last Category I hurricane to hit Connecticut. Glowacki said that statistically speaking, Connecticut is overdue for a major hurricane.

Hurricane Sandy was a Category 2 hurricane, but it did not hit Connecticut directly. The reason that Sandy was so devastating to the state was because it was, what Glowacki called, a hybrid storm. Hybrid storms like Sandy are powerful because they are able to gain energy from two different sources. Sandy gained energy as a typical hurricane and as a typical winter storm when it hit the state on Oct. 30, 2012.

Despite the predictions of an above average hurricane season and the fear that Connecticut is due for another, Devico said he is confident that the state is taking all the necessary steps to mitigate future devastation.

This past June, as part of legislation passed in 2012, an ice storm was simulated in the Torrington area to test the state’s emergency response preparedness. The way Connecticut responds to an ice storm is the same as how it would respond to a hurricane, Devico said.

In the recent past, response to ice storms has not been as quick as many would have hoped. Connecticut Light and Power came under fire for its slow response time during the 2011 October Nor’easter, leaving tens of thousands of homes and businesses without power for more than a week. Despite this, Devico claims that the state has been coordinating efforts between towns and utility companies for better restoration times. It also has been aggressively trimming trees in an effort to prevent downed electricity wires.

As the state as a whole prepares for another storm, Devico warned that residents must also take the proper steps to ensure both their own safety and the safety of their families.

Devico recommended that residents take three simple steps to prepare themselves for a hurricane: make a survival kit with items such as water, food, a radio, and batteries; make an emergency plan; and stay informed about the trajectory of a storm.

Overall, Devico believes that the state did well in responding to Sandy. However, he said there is always room for improvement.

“We always learn from every drill and every incident that we have. We capitalize on our strengths, and improve on our weaknesses,” Devico said.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(8) Comments

posted by: redman | September 24, 2013  9:00am

The so called experts have been wrong about global warming for about 15 years.

posted by: gutbomb86 | September 24, 2013  2:21pm

gutbomb86

Yeah because Rush said so, right Redman? I’m going to put my trust in 99.5% of the scientific community, including NASA, that there’s man-made climate disruption going on. Public policy needs to be based on real science, rather than talk radio nonsense.

posted by: JamesBronsdon | September 24, 2013  4:01pm

Don’t go all Al Gore on us, gutbomb.  The climes they are a changin.  Check this out:

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/

posted by: Fisherman | September 24, 2013  8:50pm

Someone should inform GutBomb about the “science” of global warming… which first occurred on earth several thousands of years ago… I think it was caused by all the automobiles and manufacturing plants in use at the dawn of time.
Can’t be too careful.

posted by: sofaman | September 25, 2013  4:26pm

Oh, my this is a healthy debate. With gutbomb86 on the ropes. With merely a vast, vast majority of the nation’s and world’s scientists, NASA, NOAA and countless other organizations on his side, I can see how the power of The Heartland Institute could be more persuasive.

Question: How on earth is the US going to continue to lead the world as a ‘Scientific World Power’ if our politics has such a strong anti-science sub-culture?

posted by: JamesBronsdon | September 26, 2013  3:58pm

sofaman, here’s one perspective on what’s behind the alarms on global warming and the investment in that way of thinking. I’m not a scientist, but I would have a healthy skepticism toward any reports produced by the U.N. and other governmental agencies that have a vested interest in more governmental control and more governmental agencies and more tax dollars.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/359556/ipcc-political-suicide-pill-patrick-j-michaels

posted by: sofaman | September 27, 2013  7:56pm

95% of scientists don’t all have the same ‘vested interest’ , well except for being correct.

posted by: JamesBronsdon | September 28, 2013  7:50am

sofaman, I don’t know where you get your 95% figure (are they polled in secret?), but academics are more subject to group think and politically correct think, and the fear of professional ostracism, than just about any other group. How many really have the courage to think and speak independently?  Here’s another article you might find interesting