Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Windows Laptops Now Under $200
Nov 1, 2014 11:00 pm
Microsoft, reacting to pressure from low-cost Chromebooks, now has its own low cost but fully functional laptop PCs...more »
Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 1:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »

Our Partners

˜

NRA Doles Out Grades To Connecticut Candidates

by Hugh McQuaid | Jul 23, 2014 12:51pm
(10) Comments | Commenting has expired

screengrab

Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Foley received a passing grade but not an endorsement from the National Rifle Association’s PAC Tuesday in a candidate scorecard distributed ahead of Connecticut’s primary elections next month.

The NRA’s Political Victory Fund graded primary candidates for statewide office as well as House and Senate races. The “A” through “F” grades were based on candidates’ records pertaining to Second Amendment issues.

In the Republican gubernatorial primary race between 2010 nominee Tom Foley and Senate Minority Leader John McKinney, the NRA gave Foley a “B-” and McKinney and “F.”

The group defines a “B” as a “generally pro-gun candidate,” but notes that the candidate may have taken some positions in support of gun control in the past. Meanwhile, the group describes a candidate assigned an “F” as a “true enemy of gun owners’ rights.”

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, the Democratic nominee, was not graded as he is not facing a primary challenge.

McKinney’s failing grade from the national gun rights group likely stems from his role in the drafting and passage of more restrictive firearm regulations in the aftermath of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. McKinney’s senate district includes Newtown where the 26 murders took place.

McKinney defended his support of the legislation during a recent debate with Foley.

CTNJ File Photo “I had the great honor of representing Newtown and Sandy Hook for the last 15 years in the state senate. I was with them at the firehouse that day. I shared the pain of those families when they were told their kids weren’t coming home,” he said.

Foley’s “B-” is likely due in part to his general comments in support of Second Amendment rights. In January, he told a gun rights group that, if elected, he would veto further restrictions on gun owners.

“I will promise you this — if I am governor any further attempts at restrictions on law-abiding gun owners by our legislature will stop at the governor’s office,” he said.

However, Foley has stopped short of calling for a repeal of the law and has been consistently unwilling to specify which gun control provisions of the statute he opposes. Through a spokesman, Foley said he was content with the NRA grade.

“A ‘B-’ in school would not have been okay with my parents but here a ‘B-’ is okay,” Foley said.

Scott Wilson, president of Connecticut Citizens Defense League, said the NRA grades were fair ratings. CCDL was the statewide gun rights group Foley addressed in January. Wilson said the organization is approaching 15,000 members. He said many of those members are also affiliated with the NRA and consider the organization’s grades.

Wilson attributed the NRA’s modest assessment of Foley to the candidate’s statements and unproven record.

CTNJ File Photo “Tom has never been elected to office before. I know he respects the rights of gun owners but that surely won’t be proven until he is in office,” he said.

As for McKinney, Wilson said an “F -” would have been more appropriate.

Connecticut Citizens Defense League has not yet graded candidates or made endorsements of its own.

On the other side of the gun control debate, Ron Pinciaro, executive director of Connecticut Against Gun Violence, said he would reverse the NRA grades. He said he would assign a “B+” to McKinney and a “C-” to Foley.

Pinciaro credited McKinney with working “very hard to come up with a fair and bipartisan solution” to the Sandy Hook shooting. He said McKinney’s ranking would have been higher, but he felt the candidate had “walked back” some of his earlier statements that were “more to our liking.”

Pinciaro said his group would be publishing scorecards for candidates for General Assembly seats within the next few weeks. However, he said they do not intend to publish candidate grades in the Republican gubernatorial primary race.

“We thought we would wait to see who the candidate was going to be before we made any endorsement or direct statements,” he said.

Although the NRA declined to make an endorsement in the GOP gubernatorial primary race, it did make endorsements in other contests. In the Republican primary race for lieutenant governor, the group endorsed, state Rep. Penny Bacchiochi, who received an “A.”

Bacchiochi’s two primary opponents were both ranked highly by the NRA. Heather Somers received an “A-” and David Walker received an “AQ.” According to the group’s website, an “AQ” means the candidate was judged to be a “pro-gun candidate” based solely on his or her responses to a questionnaire.

The NRA also endorsed Democratic state Rep. Linda Orange over her primary challenger, Jason Paul. Orange, who voted against last year’s gun control bill, was given an “A-” grade. Paul, who has made Orange’s anti-gun control vote central to his campaign, scored a “D-.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(10) Comments

posted by: Chien DeBerger | July 23, 2014  1:05pm

Yep.

posted by: cnj-david | July 23, 2014  1:44pm

Such a nice phrase “a fair and bipartisan solution”.  It ranks right up there with “commonsense gun controls”. 

Which really seem to translate to “kneejerk reactions that don’t solve any problems, don’t have any impact on the criminal or mentally unstable, appease people who don’t know very much about guns and infuriate those who legally possess them”.

As a registered voter in Connecticut that legally owns firearms for sporting purposes, you can be assured that I’ll be voting against McKinney in the primary, and against Malloy in the election.

When I have the opportunity, I’ll vote against Murphy, Blumenthal and Malloy because they’re all birds of the same feather—fowl indeed.

posted by: NoNonsense2014 | July 23, 2014  5:26pm

And we should care about the NRA’s “rating”... why exactly? Is the state in the state it’s in because of our gun laws? Nope. Until and unless the gun issue becomes the most important (or even second-most important) issue on which to evaluate a governor, I don’t give a rat’s patootie about the NRA’s “grade”.

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | July 24, 2014  6:32am

DrHunterSThompson

less guns, more weed!

i’d give me an “A” in fattie rolling!

HST

posted by: dano860 | July 24, 2014  7:12am

NN2014, you nailed it.
Keep the outside interests and their hidden agendas out of the State.
Their cash too!

posted by: GBear423 | July 24, 2014  8:00am

GBear423

@nonon-  why ya read the article then? and comment?

Apparently 15,000 people and their friends and family care about the NRA rating. democrats and republicans and swing voters are in those numbers.  Its about being a nation of free people, its in our founding, all have the right to self defense of home and family. 
Criminals should be punished and the ill should be under care. There is no legitimacy for placing burdens on People who wish to exercise their Rights.

posted by: Joebigjoe | July 24, 2014  9:56am

“Pinciaro credited McKinney ...”

LOL LOL LOL

The kiss of death for John.

I’ve said it before. If John listed out the knee jerk things that were stupidly put in the bill, short of saying he would work to shoot down the whole bill, he can flip things….but he won’t. No character because if you look at the bill and see things like bayonet lugs that have nothing to do with people getting shot, and you aren’t willing to stand up to Pinciaro and other people then you aren’t a leader.

posted by: Joebigjoe | July 24, 2014  5:01pm

I just saw this today from the Washington Post which is a tabloid if I ever saw one. Let’s assume this partially occurred. Just enough to make life difficult. Experts think we have a decent chance of this happening to us. I can tell you that number is higher than the chance of a violent crime being committed against us. I wonder if Pinciaro and McKinney will be standing guard to protect our families? Didn’t think so.

This is the Black Swan event that people like to not want to believe could ever happen. How about just terrorists shooting up the right power plant. Oh wait, that already happened.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/07/23/how-a-solar-storm-nearly-destroyed-life-as-we-know-it-two-years-ago/

posted by: shinningstars122 | July 25, 2014  5:09am

shinningstars122

This is wonderful news!

It means the NRA will not be dumping any money into any of the races in Connecticut this election cycle!!!

Wayne LaPierre has spoken and it it is silence.

What will the CCDL do now?

posted by: sofaman | July 26, 2014  9:45pm

Holy cow BJB, the only thing missing from your beautifully maniacal and moronic rant, is why didn’t you blame Obama for the solar storm?