CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

One Democrat Votes Against Malloy Tax Refund Proposal

by | Apr 1, 2014 11:05pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: State Budget, Taxes, State Capitol, Groton

Courtesy of the House Democratic Caucus Rep. Ted Moukawsher of Groton was the lone Democrat on the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee to vote Tuesday against the governor’s $155 million election-year tax refund.

The money for the refund would come from the 2014 surplus, which was certified by state Comptroller Kevin Lembo on Tuesday at about $504.9 million.

The final vote was 31-19 in favor of the proposal. Moukawsher joined Republicans in voting against it partly because of Lembo’s analysis of the current budget.

Lembo warned Gov. Dannel P. Malloy in his monthly letter that most of the 2014 surplus comes from “a one-time tax amnesty program, and from the most volatile component of the income tax, which relies on strong stock market performance.” He also reminded the governor that the legislature’s Office of Fiscal Analysis and the Office of Policy and Management has estimated budget shortfalls beginning in 2016.

“That’s unfortunate that we’re not seeing ourselves in deficit,” Moukawsher said, referring to the more than $1 billion deficit in fiscal year 2016.

He said the current surplus is the product of a number of things including “borrowing.”

One of the failed Republican amendments would have utilized up to $196 million of the surplus to pay down the 2009 Economic Recovery Notes. Payment on the notes were postponed until 2018.

“We are told we’re going to have a $1 billion deficit in 2016. I think we have to take that seriously and I don’t feel that we should do anything with this money but put it aside to respond to that eventuality,” Moukawsher said.

He said when he goes back home he has to answer to his constituents and let them know he used his best judgment and “I can’t in good conscience say we have money to spend when we’ve been in a very precarious situation.”

Sen. Toni Boucher, R-Wilton, wondered if there even is a surplus or if it’s just money from borrowing that hasn’t been used yet.

“I think what everyone wants to see is real tax reform,” Boucher said. “This is not real tax reform.”

Republicans offered two amendments to the proposal, but both failed along party-lines.

Rep. Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, said the bill ignores a long-term solution.

“We really should be using every surplus revenue to institute policies that would pay down long-term obligations and policies,” Candelora said. “In my district, people are asking, `What can I do with $55?’ Just keep the money and pay down debt.”

Rep. Patricia Widlitz, who co-chairs the committee, pointed out that the words “rebate” and “refund” have been used interchangeably, but mean completely different things. She said the refund is an acknowledgement that taxpayers have helped the state get through some tough times by contributing a little bit more in 2011 when they were asked.

“This is a tribute to the people who withstood the hard times with us,” she said.

The $55 refund also won’t be subject to a federal income tax like a rebate.

“Three years ago when we were faced with significant challenges with respect to our budget, major deficits, the governor of this state asked for the citizens of this state, taxpayers in the state to share in the sacrifice to get us over the hump,” Sen. John Fonfara, the other co-chairman of the committee, said. “Many of us here support that initiative and the taxpayers of the state stepped up.”

Fonfara said Malloy could have punted and deferred many of the state’s long term liabilities, but he didn’t.

Sen. Minority Leader John McKinney, who is running for the Republican nomination for governor, begged to differ calling Democratic lawmakers a “rubber stamp” for Malloy.

“Like the governor’s proposal, this budget is unbalanced, fails to adequately pay down state debt, and ignores long-term structural deficiencies in state government,” McKinney said in a statement. “The result is a tax and spending plan Connecticut residents cannot afford today, and one that is projected to sink the state back into a $1 billion deficit by the middle of next year.”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |


(5) Archived Comments

posted by: art vandelay | April 2, 2014  8:59am

art vandelay

Senator Moukawsher has to realize he’s not Santa Claus (Malloy) & he’s NOT driving the sleigh.  Santa Claus HAS to get those presents out before Christmas (election) eve.

posted by: jim black | April 2, 2014  9:11am

I for one will take that $55.00 and double it, sending it to whomever is running against Malloy

posted by: robn | April 2, 2014  9:32pm

Would somebody please inform Rep. Widlitz and Sen. Fonfara that taxpayers ARE the state.

posted by: SocialButterfly | April 3, 2014  11:30am

The tax refund is simply a Gov. Malloy proposed scam to attempt to get the uninformed voters to vote him back into office. Dan is getting the most out of his daily tax-payer paid press releases.
Unlike any Republican candidate for governor—Malloy can be “tax refund careless with the truth” with our fiscal deficit that projects an excess of a $1 billion dollar budget shortfall at the end of the fiscal year.
He must think that voters are not “Smarter than a Fourth Grader.”  No one, however, can beat Malloy as the uncanny politician he is—added by his power-seat in governor’s chair that gives him a real advantage that he is using to win the election against a yet unknown Republican candidate for Governor.  Malloy is in office—in the driver’s seat—“playing his reelection deck of cards—
being the skillful politician he is, with a big advantage over any Republican candidate for governor that is yet to surface.”

posted by: art vandelay | April 3, 2014  12:34pm

art vandelay

Well said!

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages