CT News Junkie | OP-ED | Foley Leads Republican Field In Race For Gov’s Office

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

OP-ED | Foley Leads Republican Field In Race For Gov’s Office

by | Jul 12, 2013 8:57am
() Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2014, Opinion

L to R: Tom Foley, John McKinney, and Mark Boughton


Pundits often want to expand the number of options available in making electoral predictions. This is particularly true when elections are far off. It makes it less likely they will be out-and-out wrong as well as allowing them to make nice with all the candidates who are “plausible.” It is not, however, a good way to actually predict what will happen. Making things seem less certain than they are might be safer, but it isn’t smarter.

That seems to be what’s going on with predictions about the Republican candidates for governor. Along with Foley, two names are consistently being floated: Senate Minority Leader John McKinney and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton, who each face their own challenges. The reporting on the race also exhibits a certain tentativeness and an assumption that more names may surface. Overall, the impression is of a race that has not really yet begun.

So let’s start off by acknowledging the obvious: Tom Foley is a candidate for Governor. For months, pundits pretended that Foley was considering a run when he was already in campaign mode. In reality, he never really stopped running after losing in 2010. The other “candidates” the pundits cite are closer to being potential candidates. Until they actually declare, they are basically dithering.

From there it is also clear that Foley starts off as the frontrunner for the Republican nomination and by a fairly wide margin. I put the odds at winning the nomination at more than 4-to-1.

Conventional wisdom would argue that it’s still early, that such speculation more than a year from the primary is premature. The old story line is that people haven’t started paying attention yet, and therefore there is a good likelihood that when they do, things will change. Everyone will take a good look at all the candidates and reassess their positions. Consequently, any current advantage in the polls — Foley’s internal poll has him as the only Republican known statewide — is ephemeral.

Recent history, however, has shown how hard it is to get people to take another look at a race. In 2010, both the nominees who won their party’s endorsement at the convention also took the primary. Only five candidates from both parties even made it onto the ballot, even though at one point about a dozen candidates were running. Foley, as his polling shows, has a very large lead in name recognition. This lead means he will have the high ground throughout the entire Republican campaign, meaning all the other candidates will be taking shots at him from a weaker position.

Additionally, Foley functions as the de-facto incumbent in this race. It is hard to imagine why Republicans would not re-nominate him; he lost by only 6,400 votes in 2010. Even after Linda McMahon’s ten-point defeat in the 2010 Senate race, she was easily re-nominated as the 2012 Republican Senate candidate over what looked like a strong opponent in Chris Shays. Who left in the Republican field of gubernatorial candidates has anything like the advantages that Chris Shays should have had in his race against McMahon?

Foley also has the advantage of not getting on the wrong side of the Republican base on guns, taking a cleverly worded position on the Connecticut gun bill. And Foley has a nearly endless amount of money to fund the race. With all of these advantages, and no clear declaration from any of the other candidates, it seems more likely that Foley will run unopposed than that he will lose a primary. This may spoil the pundits’ party, yet it is time to prepare for Foley-Malloy, Round Two.

Jason Paul of West Hartford is a partner in a campaign consulting company called What’s Next. He is also a student at the University of Connecticut Law School.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comments

(3) Archived Comments

posted by: Commuter | July 13, 2013  1:54pm

The party people have been fairly clear they don’t want him. Labriola is on the public record categorically rejecting self-funding as a legitimate basis for getting a nomination.

That means it is a matter of whether or not an acceptable alternative to Foley emerges. Both McKinney and Boughton would be acceptable. If either gets in, he would be considered the front runner for the party endorsement.

That explains why Foley has been positioning himself right along for a primary challenge. He’s attacked the legislature as corrupt, he’s refused to take a position that would offend the gun nuts. He’s kissed up to Joe Markley, the single looniest member of the minority caucus in the Senate (and if you belief the chatter, not a fan of McKinney).

Of course, if it plays out that way, if McKinney for example gets the party endorsement and Foley runs to the nuttier side to gain the active base vote that determines party primaries, it will tend to make Foley vulnerable in the match-up against Malloy, since this is still Connecticut, and Foley will inevitably provide material that will make most voters uneasy about him as governor.

BTW:
McKinney won’t declare until Labor Day. Boughton can’t declare until after November when his reelection campaign in Danbury is officially over, and some say he has to wait until January.

Dark horse candidate: Senator Tony Boucher. Her recent editorial smacks of someone looking to raise her profile as a viable challenger to Malloy.

Watch the picnic and cocktail scene between now and September. If McKinney and Boucher are showing up outside their respective districts, take notice.

posted by: Alex_ | July 17, 2013  9:24pm

Tom Foley’s position on guns is less cleverly worded when he’s on the spot (begin watching at 1:50): http://t.co/5D0H5QlUTR

posted by: Salmo | July 17, 2013  11:29pm

The election is how far away? And I already do not trust Mr. Foley.