CT News Junkie | OP-ED | In Winsted, Leaving Expensive Messes For Others To Clean Up

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

OP-ED | In Winsted, Leaving Expensive Messes For Others To Clean Up

by | Jul 10, 2015 4:30am
() Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Analysis, Education, Local Politics, Opinion, Poverty, Taxes, Winsted

Register Citizen file photo

The town seal of Winchester, which includes Winsted


You know you’ve hit rock bottom when the state of Connecticut has to come in and clean up your municipal mess. Contrary to popular belief, the state hates to pilot the local ship. It’s expensive, it’s a distraction and it evinces the supercilious paternalism of big brother.

But judging by news coverage and social media, most residents of the Litchfield County town of Winchester, commonly known as Winsted, are breathing a sigh of relief now that the state Department of Education has decided once and for all to ride into town and assume management of Winsted’s miserable school system.

REGISTER CITIZEN FILE PHOTO Some observers, including yours truly, had hoped the state would take over the entire beleaguered town. After all, officials in both Town Hall and school headquarters have been lurching from crisis to crisis for years. From the theft of millions of dollars by the town’s finance director to $720,000 in missing special education funds to a string of firings and resignations among senior school district administrators, the few capable people left in town government have been overwhelmed by the chaos and ineptitude that has surrounded them.

In November 2013, the state Department of Education was investigating the town for failing to meet the state’s minimum budget requirement, while the superintendent told parents and taxpayers the town’s public schools might close by Christmas for lack of cash.

In justifying his support of the takeover, state Rep. Andrew Fleischmann, the West Hartford Democrat who co-chairs the General Assembly’s education committee, told The Courant that Winsted is “facing more challenges than any district I’ve witnessed while in the legislature . . . I mean, everything has been going wrong . . . It’s a horrendously mismanaged district and we’re hoping the receiver can straighten things out.”

And that’s saying a lot. Four years ago, the state Education Department took over the schools in Windham, a hardscrabble town similar to Winsted. Pushed by the General Assembly, the state dissolved the Hartford Board of Education and took control of its schools in 1997 — the first such takover in state history. And of course, the state began its ill-fated seizure of the troubled Bridgeport system in 2011 — an action that was later overturned on a technicality by the state Supreme Court.

So Fleischmann, who has been in office since 1995, knows whereof he speaks. He’s seen his share of “horrendously mismanaged” school districts. And so have I. Disclosure: for more than five years, I worked as the development director for The Gilbert School, Winsted’s quasi-public junior-senior high school, and saw firsthand the incompetence and turmoil that precipitated the state’s drastic but justifiable action. Fortunately, the emerging Gilbert has been in much better hands than the town’s public system and so will not be directly subjected to the strong arm of the state.

In justifying the takeover, a Department of Education spokesperson cited an “egregious lack of fiscal oversight” and mismanagement, if not actual criminal activity. But the best rationale for seizing control is to protect the district’s 1,000 or so students, 60 percent of whom qualify for free-or-reduced price lunches and almost 20 percent of whom require special education services.

Ironically, the Winsted Taxpayers Association, whose mantra is “lower taxes and less government,” will instead see higher taxes and more government. Inasmuch as the town is broke and taxpayers wouldn’t approve increased education spending anyway, the receiver appointed by the education commissioner will now have oversight of the school budget. That means the state itself will impose large tax increases in a town that for years has had a flat budget that barely meets the state minimum budget requirements, if that.

Flat budgets have resulted in lower wages in the Winsted schools than in surrounding communities, which makes competent people hard to attract and retain, which has in part caused the disaster the town is now facing.

Message to the town’s naysayers: you’ve made your bed; now you must lie in it.

Contributing op-ed columnist Terry Cowgill lives in Lakeville, blogs at ctdevilsadvocate.com and is news editor of The Berkshire Record in Great Barrington, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @terrycowgill.

DISCLAIMER: The views, opinions, positions, or strategies expressed by the author are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of CTNewsJunkie.com.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comments

(3) Archived Comments

posted by: shinningstars122 | July 11, 2015  12:34pm

shinningstars122

@Terry we all love it when you only tell half the story about the challenges facing Winsted.

Yes the Board of Ed and the Superintendent royally screwed up, not the Town Manager or the Board of Selectmen who only see one line item of the the total amount requested are not entirely to blame.

Many other towns have similarly structure divisions of accountability between the town and board of Ed.

Until you can actually go through the Board of Ed budget line by line I would not simply have a knee jerk reaction that taxes will go up because of state receivership.

Clearly the majority of voters in town want that to change.

Yes it has created serious problems beyond what this current board and Superintendent are capable of managing, so many here do welcome the state stepping in as it is in the town’s best interests for the long term.

As for you dissing on Winsted, the town is not running out of money. The voters recently voted in a new $32.8 million dollar budget with barely a 1% increase in the mill rate.

In 2014 the grand list actually expanded too.

The Board of selectman and Town Manger are working to build up the fund balance and have begun work on repairing roads.

Granted the Board of Ed will have to repay the state $720,000 plus the negative deficit for the current fiscal year.

It is also an achievable goal to restore our Bond rating as well.

We have hired a new Police Chief, last year a new Public Works director was hired along with a new fiance director.

From what you write you think their was a loss of will in our community but far from it sir as many of like minded residents support the positive changes that are occurring at Whiting  Mills, the AMP, Morsel Monk opening on Main Street and the soon to be opened American Museum of Tort Law to just name a few.

Yes it has been a slow and argduous climb back from the Centrella theft and now we, not you sir, will have to deal with these new challenges.

So Terry in the mean time please just do us all a favor and just move to Great Barrington.

posted by: SocialButterfly | July 13, 2015  9:26am

@shinningstars122: The views of Terry Cowgill are not your problem “as you are definately not-a-problem solver!”

posted by: CTDeeJay | July 13, 2015  6:45pm

Is it just me or does it seem Centrella hasn’t been the only embezzler in Winsted the last few years? How does $720k just go missing without a criminal investigation being launched? Maybe everyone’s waiting for the receiver to ask for one but I’d think if you need to call in a receiver then the investigation should be underway before that.

And this whole thing seems to have been taken lightly with little notice outside of Winsted or the capitol. Last I knew receiverships were rare, why does everyone involved seem to act as though it’s routine and no big deal? How did it get through legislature with no one noticing until it was passed?