Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

OP-ED | The Roraback Republican

by Susan Bigelow | Oct 5, 2012 9:43am
(3) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2012, Opinion

When Andrew Roraback appeared on WNPR’s “Where We Live” earlier this week, listeners got to hear him engage in a time-honored tradition for Connecticut Republicans who hope to have a shot at actually winning an election: backing away from the national party.

It’s yet another reminder of how badly the two-party system is serving us.

Believe it or not, Connecticut used to be one of America’s Republican heartlands. Republican roots were planted deep inside Yankee culture and values, stretching back to the Gilded Age and the Civil War era. But ever since the 1960s, Connecticut has been becoming less and less Republican as the party’s center of gravity has shifted away from the once-solid northeast to the south and west. Republicans like Raymond Baldwin, John Davis Lodge, and even Prescott Bush would be hard-pressed to find many like themselves in positions of power in today’s Republican Party. Connecticut conservatism is different, far more old-school patrician than fiery moralist or haughty Ayn Rand acolyte.

Those Republicans who have been successful in Connecticut have done it largely in spite of — rather than because of — the national party and the mainstream conservative movement. Lowell Weicker, who was Connecticut’s last Republican U.S. Senator, infuriated conservatives both nationally and here at home. Weicker so alienated the conservative movement that they tried to take him out via primary challenge in 1982. And when that didn’t work it was William F. Buckley who helped Joe Lieberman defeat Weicker in 1988. Former Rep. Christopher Shays was long despised by other Republicans for being too moderate for their tastes, and he felt it this year when he tried to challenge Linda McMahon. Former Gov. Jodi Rell often found herself at odds with her own party in the legislature. After she proposed big tax increases to pay for an education overhaul early in her second term, incensed Republican stalwarts from the Wall Street Journal to the local conservative blogosphere were up in arms.

Roraback fits this mold — another of what GOP Chairman Gerald Labriola, speaking to the News-Times, called “a long tradition of Yankee Republicans with an independent streak.” Roraback called himself a “Roraback Republican” and blasted both parties for “going away from the center” on “Where We Live” this week. This follows a nasty primary where his opponents tried to paint him as a liberal RINO; his right wing is still restless. Moderates like Roraback are very hard to find in today’s Republican Party, which is arguably the more exclusionary and extremist of the two major parties. There are very few of Labriola’s “Yankee Republicans” left — with the possible exception of Mitt Romney, depending on what he believes this week. Roraback, if elected, would be pretty much on his own.

I was talking on Twitter with some politically-minded folks the other day, and someone suggested that Connecticut Republicans ought to just ditch the national party and go it alone. The restrictions of the two party system, which guarantee both national money and a ready-made party base, among other things, makes this practically impossible. Still, imagine what a New England-flavored center-right opposition could do if it wasn’t burdened with the baggage of the national party. This state is now full of places Republicans can’t win because of history and the antics of the national party, rather than because of their ideas or the strength of their candidates.

So what to do? Republicans running for Congress in Connecticut will likely keep doing this dance where they both embrace and disavow the national GOP for as long as it’s marginally effective, but that doesn’t solve the underlying issue: party politics is becoming strongly regional again, like it was a century-and-a-half ago. Ask a Democrat in West Virginia or Utah, and they’ll sigh and give you a version of the same story.

It’s almost tempting to urge Connecticut Republicans to make a fresh start as a new party, but that would just speed the forces of separation and disintegration that are dividing us, northeast from south, Midwest from mountains, coasts from interior. What I wish for is something that speaks to every one of us, that reminds us that there’s a country existing beyond party and region and class and religion. Unless and until a political shift helps us find our common ground again, I doubt I’ll see it. For now, moderates will try to thread the needle, and with every one of them who vanishes, we lose a little more of the glue that holds us together.

Susan Bigelow is an award-winning columnist and the founder of CTLocalPolitics. She lives in Enfield with her wife and their cats.

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(3) Comments

posted by: shinningstars122 | October 6, 2012  1:43pm

shinningstars122

Susan offers some moderation in a political season of extremes in the fight for the middle class.

I did listen to the “Where We Live” interview too and felt he made a rational arguement.
I do respect Andrew Roraback and spoke at length once on the phone a few years back and believe he will not fold under pressure but honestly it not pressure in Washington anymore it is extortion that both parties wield.

I mean he does not understand what deals he will have to make with the devil just to get crumbs from the table for our district.
It is not practical or achievable until a few major changes occur. The first being the repeal of corporate personhood, which both he and Esty support, followed by limiting all campaign donations to
$250 period and finally term limits for all members of Congress.

Maybe he can be a force of change? The reality is that he has spent a long time in public service and I highly doubt that he would be a true pioneer in these areas.
Don’t bite the hand that bakes your bread comes to mind.

As for a third party well look at the Joe Lieberman Party, boy that was a real winner for Connecticut.

I would much rather go with the Working Familes party myself.

posted by: Todd Peterson | October 7, 2012  11:42am

I only read this piece because Andrew is a friend of mine and I’m a big supporter of his.

Andrew is indeed what has been traditionally labelled a “Northeastern Republican”.  While Susan is correct about his being to the left of many Republicans in Congress, I’d like to see an acknowledgement of her party’s hard left stance.

Elizabeth Esty has a record of being a Democratic version of Andrew. Unfortunately she has taken a far left turn after achieving a solid win over unionista Donovan effectively yielding to the very people that she defeated.  How about talking about how your candidate has, if you pardon the expression, grabbed her ankles for the unionistas after their guy got only 32% of the primary vote.

posted by: RE-Windsor, CT | October 8, 2012  5:00pm

We spend way too much time on the social issues.  I am a social moderate, and a fiscal conservative Republican.  The national party and I disagree on many issues. 

The biggest issue that faces us today is the economy and national and state deficits. Whether or not a gay child today will be able to marry or that child is able to get an abortion is not nearly as important as the possibility they may never be able to find a job, buy a home, and be second class citizens paying off the debt their parents and grandparents heaped upon them so they could live the ‘good’ life.  Gov. Malloy is doing just that with his Fast Five bonding, a deplorable act, to say the least.  Giving billionaires money that the middle class have to pay off years after the money is gone, It is so stupid as to be beyond words.

To those who believe social issues are the most important thing to consider. Remember that while you’re in the bread line. The really important issues today are the spending that is out of control on the national and state levels.

Social issues are not going to pay for the rent, your home, or food on the table.  They are important, however, today they are not as important as the economy.  To those that believe this is the most important position that may be because you have a job and you have a home, but I’m thinking right now about those who do not have a job and do not have a home and have little hope for one.