CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Parent Group Asks For Option To Opt Kids Out Of Testing

by | Feb 27, 2014 6:33pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Education, Equality, Local Politics

Hugh McQuaid Photo A group of parents and educators want the legislature to pass a bill ensuring that parents of school children have the option of pulling their kids out of required standardized testing.

Advocates calling themselves the Parent-Teacher Save Our Schools Alliance held a press conference Thursday and called upon lawmakers to pass legislation to enable parents to opt their children out of statewide standardized tests.

Terry Dickinson, an East Haddam mother, said she has pulled her son, Charles, from the town’s public school and enrolled him in a private school because of difficulties opting him out of the tests.

“Charles is a 16-year-old boy with a dream and goals for his future. He is not a test score,” she said. “For the first time in a year, he is happy now. He has teachers who are engaged. He doesn’t have to fill in bubbles anymore.”

Dickinson and others at the press conference reported attending events in Connecticut with hundreds of other parents looking for guidance on how to remove their children from the testing process.

The pushback against standardized testing comes as many of the state’s school children will be taking a new test called the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium test, which is designed to assess new and controversial national education standards called the Common Core. This year school districts were given the option of taking the new test or taking the state’s traditional assessments like the Connecticut Mastery Test.

Kelly Donnelly, a spokeswoman for the state Education Department, said the law does not allow parents to opt their kids out of these assessments. She said there are state and federal requirements that children enrolled in public schools must participate in assessments at certain grades.

“These laws do not provide a provision for parents to ‘opt-out’ their children from taking state tests. These mandates have been in effect for many years and the State Department of Education, as well as all public schools, must comply,” she said.

Members of the parent-teacher organization disagreed and pointed to a December Education Department memo designed to offer school districts guidance in responding to parents who are seeking to remove their kids from a test.

The memo recommends several steps for administrators to convince parents not to pull their children from the process, beginning with referencing the state and federal laws. Eventually, if the parent insists in writing that their child will not be taking the test, the memo says the student will be counted as absent, which will hurt the district’s participation rate. But the document notes that the state has not done any follow-ups on such cases.

“There are no sanctions for opting out. That’s what we’re told,” Jesse Turner, a Central Connecticut State University professor, said. “It would be sort of like saying ‘Everybody should drive 55 [mph] but if you don’t, nothing is going to happen to you.’ We’d probably all drive 85, 90, maybe 100, I don’t know.”

With no individual consequences, some advocates are hoping parents will opt out in high numbers.

Hugh McQuaid Photo “My dream is that everybody will opt out and nobody will be given a test and teachers can really get back to educating children . . . not just preparing them for a test,” Gloria Brown, a retired Wolcott teacher, said.

If that were to happen, it would put school districts in violation of a federal law that requires that 95 percent of enrolled students take the standardized tests.

Donnelly said this year’s testing period represents a “low-stakes” environment because the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium test is still being “field tested” and its results won’t count for toward formal evaluations of students and teachers.

“By participating in the field test, students also provide necessary input to ensure that future tests are a fair and accurate representation of Connecticut students’ knowledge and abilities,” she said. “Overall, the experience will better prepare students, teachers and schools for future administrations of the tests — and for reaching the new, higher Common Core standards.”

Dickinson said she was concerned about that “testing the test” process and was worried about what the state planned to do with the data collected from her son’s test results.

“These are serious concerns. They’re putting this stuff into place before it’s been thought through and I’m sorry, my son is not going your guinea pig,” she said.

State Rep. Andrew Fleischmann, co-chairman of the legislature’s Education Committee, said Wednesday that local school districts were given wide latitude to decide which test to give their students this year. School districts were given a choice between the legacy Connecticut Mastery and Connecticut Academic Performance tests, and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium test.

“Connecticut has a long history of local control,” Fleischmann said.

As far as the concept of standardized testing goes, Fleischmann said without it, it would be difficult to compare how one district is doing with another. The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium tests also will help Connecticut compare its students against students in other states.

“It’s not appealing, but I think it’s necessary,” he said.

Christine Stuart contributed to this report.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |


(6) Archived Comments

posted by: Linda12 | February 27, 2014  9:32pm

I’ve decided some of these legislators don’t really know what they are talking about. They get SDE talking points and repeat them ad nauseum. Yesterday, according to Andrew CCS was a curriculum.  Time for a meeting to rehash the reformy talking points.  Parents have always had the right to opt out. Without the test scores, they have nothing, absolutely nothing.

Fleischman yesterday:

That’s unlikely to happen, said state Rep. Andrew Fleischmann, a West Hartford Democrat who co-chairs the legislature’s education committee. “I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to put a moratorium on a curriculum that’s already rolled out across the state,’’ he said.

posted by: Bluecoat | February 28, 2014  7:38am

If the author of this would just read the RTTP , Common Core Standards, and the Assessment agreements, , it is easy to find out that up to 5% of the students can opt out of the tests.
Not hard to find and just pure laziness.

How big is our data collection office within the SDE?
How much has been spent to create the SLDS- Statewide Longitudinal Data Base, where all “student level data” will be stored on every student. Thanks the the Smarter Balanced agreement with the Feds, they are now authorized to collect this data. Much of this data is personal and private, and no adult should be able to ask a child for.
Now that the Feds dismantled the 1974 Family Education Rights to Privacy Law (FERPA), what is exactly CT’s privacy law? Who is protecting our kids from the privacy invasive question that will be asked of our kids without written notification or permission? What are the names of the 3rd party companies that will now have access to our kids information? Are there any adults in the SDE or legislature that gives a crap? It is time to halt the Smarter Balanced Assessments, Period!
Many States have pulled out of either the PARCC or Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium tests primarily for the privacy issues, what are we waiting for here in CT?

posted by: Poetic Justice | February 28, 2014  11:01am

Our children and grandchildren are more than data points. The powerful rhetoric of the reformers is inhumane and abusive. This legislation would greatly benefit the children of CT and help to ensure that future generations of students will not be subject to the pedagogical abuse we see forced into our schools under the current state and federal policies.

posted by: msconcerned | February 28, 2014  8:09pm

College applications anyone..anyone without test scores.

posted by: Bluecoat | February 28, 2014  9:00pm

Can you provide proof that these assessments, along with the Race to the Top Program, and the Common Core State Standards have held any teachers accountable, or have successfully been implemented anywhere on this planet?
Something, anything?
The debate is on the the way these were implemented behind closed doors and then copyrighted by two private trade organization. If fact, David Coleman, the “Chief Architect” of these “internationally benchmarked” (completely untrue and no longer used as a talking point), said in a video taped presentation in 2011, that he and his helpers at Student Achieve Partners, WERE NOT QUALIFIED to write the standards.
And after 10 years of standardized tests we have doubled down on stupid.
Curious that Bill Gates just said a few weeks ago that he doesn’t know if our Ed reforms will work, and it make ten years to find out.
Do we really want another ten years of computerized testing?
I think parents are screaming for classical reading, writing, arithmetic to be taught in our schools. No more gimmicks.

posted by: newhavenpublic | March 1, 2014  7:38am

@ABC - Our public schools are strong.  They are under attack by privateers who wish to destroy teacher unions and profit by turning teaching into a job.  You are incorrect about the AFT and NEA being behind the opt-out groundswell sweeping the USA.  The two teacher unions have received ten million dollars from Bill and Melinda Gates to promote Common Core school standardization and testing program.

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages