Social Networks We Use


CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners


Report: Spending Cuts Could Hurt Economy

by Christine Stuart | Dec 19, 2012 1:00pm
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Economics, Education, State Budget

As the General Assembly convened to erase a $365 million budget deficit Wednesday, the Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis warned that balancing next year’s budget solely on spending cuts could hurt the state’s economy.

The think-tank of economists concluded that cutting spending by more than $200 million in each of the next fiscal years could trigger hundreds of thousands of job losses.

“Such cuts would cost more than 5,000 jobs each year; if cuts rose to a billion dollars, the result would be a loss of about 25,000 jobs each year, eliminating essentially all jobs created since the recovery began,” analysts at the center concluded after running the two scenarios through economic models.

The state’s budget next year is about $1.3 billion in the red and just shy of one billion the following year. Gov. Dannel P. Malloy has said he doesn’t intend to raise taxes, which leaves him with very few choices.

In 2011, Malloy inked a deal with state employee unions that guarantees them no-layoffs until Jan. 1, 2015. That leaves him with spending cuts. It’s unclear where those cuts will be made and how deep they will go. He will present his budget in February.

Wednesday’s report from the Center for Economic Analysis encourages the state to maintain its investments by borrowing for capital projects, in order to off-set the spending cuts it will have to make.

“Even as the state cuts its current services budget it still has the capacity to push forward with capital projects, funded through bonding,” the report says.

While the approach leaves the public sector vulnerable to layoffs, the report believes the private sector gains from these capital projects would mitigate them.

The report entitled “Averting the Doldrums:Will Connecticut Avoid Recession?” concluded that job losses avoided by the matching capital expenditures would be concentrated in the private sector so that “the remaining private sector layoffs are in the 325‐382 range compared with 2,248‐2,308 with only state service cuts.”

It concluded that “the capital expenditures generate sufficient net revenues for government to more than cover the interest on the debt incurred to undertake the capital expenditures during construction.”

Malloy’s administration remains committed to cutting spending, but it has also said it would not cut back on its investments in capital projects. Some Republicans have criticized the sizable loans the state has made to various companies, including a hedge fund in Westport. But Malloy isn’t backing down.

Last week, when Malloy attended the opening of a new commercial business in the Colt building in Hartford, Malloy said he planned to stay the course and continuing to borrow money to pay for these types of economic projects. The business received a $500,000 grant from the state for improvements to the second floor of the building.

The report lauds the investment efforts the state already has made with Jackson Laboratories and the Hartford‐New Britain busway, which its group of economists believe will add jobs. But not as many jobs as they might have.

Economists at the center also concluded that if those investments were adding to investments made by previous administrations, then the economy would recover much faster. “Yet the indications are that this flow will contract significantly as a result of the Rell administration putting far fewer projects into the pipeline,” it says.

Fred Carstensen, one of the authors of the report, has applauded former Gov. John Rowland’s administration for putting billions into the state’s higher education system. The problem is, the investments weren’t linked to areas where our economy was growing, he said.

Meanwhile, Carstensen said former Gov. M. Jodi Rell and the Democratic-controlled legislature spent every dime available to the state while ignoring its economic trajectory as compared to other states.

Wednesday’s report echoed previous statements the Center has made about the state’s failure to track its economic progress.

“Like other states we’re caught in a national economy that’s been slow to recover,” Gian-Carl Casa, Malloy’s undersecretary for legislative affairs, said Wednesday. “We believe we’re on the right track by making the state live within its means. That’s part of remaining competitive with our neighboring states as a place to live and do business.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(4) Comments

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | December 19, 2012  5:06pm

Well, are you Keynesian? Or do you prefer Milton Friedman?  That is the question. Monopoly anyone?

Whether tis nobler to suffer the slings and taxes at present or risk the monolithic collapse of the future? So as I walk through the valley of the shadow of democrats I fear no evil.


posted by: Reasonable | December 19, 2012  9:05pm

DrHunterSThompson: In you walk through thre valley of the shadow of Democrats—you must have determined who the fault of our massive state budget shortfall belongs to, and start feeling some evil— HST.

posted by: Hoosier@CT | December 20, 2012  10:33am

These people are beyond contempt. Spending cuts will hurt the economy?  Or would spending cuts make the cost of doing busness in connecticut look more stable to prospect companies?  We need to create an environment of stability and less regulation to attract employers and strengthen our revenue (taxes) base.

posted by: Reasonable | December 20, 2012  11:39am

Hoosier@CT: You missed the reason for out state demise—completely.  Connecticut is one of the top-three most taxed states in the—which is the biggest obstacle to promote new business.  WE can’t afford any more taxes in our much overtaxed state—so we have to make budget cuts—as our problem is has been “spending money we don’t have” —resulting in no other alternative than budget cuts—to stem our Democratic controlled -false prosperity in deficit spending to win votes to be reelected. Bad politics won’t change in our state as long as our big-city entitlement crowd controls the outcome of our state elections—and lets the Democrats control Connecticut—“lock, Stock and barrel.”