Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Some Customers Say Transition From AT&T To Frontier Has Been Bumpy
Oct 29, 2014 2:26 pm
(Updated 7 p.m.) Customers who previously had AT&T Inc. landline, Internet, and video services were switched over to...more »
Social Enterprise Trust Honors Entrepreneurs Who Hope to Change the World
Oct 28, 2014 11:51 pm
Entrepreneurs interested in making social changes across the world as well as growing their bottom line are an...more »

Our Partners

˜

Residents Rally Against Nursing Home For Prisoners

by Hugh McQuaid | Feb 20, 2013 5:30pm
(2) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Public Safety, State Capitol

Hugh McQuaid Photo

Rocky Hill residents

Rocky Hill residents and their elected representatives have used a bill, a lawsuit, and a cold, Wednesday morning rally on the steps of the state Capitol building to try to stop the state from establishing a private nursing home facility in their town to treat ailing prison inmates.

Last year, the state selected a company called SecureCare, a subsidiary of iCare, to run the nursing home facility to house patients from the Correction Department and the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. The company chose a former nursing home building on West Street in Rocky Hill as the site, according to the Office of Legislative Research.

The facility will cost an estimated $10-12 million a year to operate. Half of that cost will be reimbursed by the federal government under Medicaid.

However, Rocky Hill residents see the facility as a public safety threat, and unions representing correction officers view it as the first step in a plan to privatize their work. Both groups are contesting plans for the new facility.

In December, the town of Rocky Hill filed for an injunction against SecureCare in Hartford Superior Court. The town claims the nursing home company violated its zoning requirements as the building has been vacant a few years and is no longer in compliance.

Last month, Rep. Antonio Guerrera and Sen. Paul Doyle, two Democrats who represent the town in the General Assembly, filed legislation to prevent the state from placing a nursing home serving prison inmates and mental health patients in a residential area without prior approval from a town. The bill is currently awaiting a public hearing in the Public Health Committee.

Wednesday’s rally on the North steps of the Capitol was attended by around 100 Rocky Hill residents and prison officers. It ended with Guerrera and Doyle dropping off a petition in Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s office before leading the crowd in a “Just say no” chant in the halls of the Capitol. Some of the Malloy’s staff watched the display, but the governor was out of the office.

Opposition to the nursing home pits Guerrera and Doyle against Malloy, a fellow Democrat who supports the initiative. Malloy was frequently criticized for putting money over safety at a rally on Wednesday.

Several Rocky Hill residents spoke about the impact the facility will have on their community. Nicole Crawford, who lives on the same street as the nursing home, said they came to the Capitol so that Malloy would hear their voice on the matter. She said the governor and iCare were putting the safety of Rocky Hill families in jeopardy to save money.

“The state and iCare want to open a privately-owned and privately-run prison hospital that would house rapists, pedofiles, drug dealers, and the mentally ill in a residential neighborhood where children live, play, and go to school,” she said.

Leslie Kerz, another member of the Rocky Hill community, asked if any state government officials would want the same facilities near their homes.

“Fifty feet from where they play baseball with their children. How would they sleep at night?” she asked.

Michael Lawlor, Malloy’s senior criminal justice adviser, said he understood the apprehension town residents were feeling, but he said the people in the nursing home wouldn’t pose much of a threat to the community.

“They’re nursing home patients. We’re talking about the highest level of care,” he said. “People in nursing homes are extremely disabled and more often than not can’t even get out of their beds.”

Lawlor said the Rocky Hill facility is expected to open next week and will eventually house around 95 patients. He said they will be people who would be leaving prison anyway, except that the state has nowhere to put them.

While it’s not uncommon for someone leaving the correction system to be placed in a nursing home, Lawlor said some facilities are reluctant to take them and the population of inmates needing nursing home care has risen starkly in recent years.

But the facility also raises eyebrows among correctional workers who feel the nursing home patients should be housed in a state-run facility, which could be established at one of state’s vacant prisons and staffed by correction workers.

“If you have to put them somewhere then re-open those facilities,” said Joe Vecchitto, a correction officer and member of AFSCME Local 391.

Vecchitto said he was wearing “two hats” at the rally because his mother was in the hospital, which had him thinking about what would happen to her if she had to be placed in a nursing home. He said she would need to pay for it out of her own pocket.

“So maybe what she should do, God forbid, would be to commit a crime, go to jail, and get it for free. It makes no sense to me,” he said.

Lawlor said the inmates would be taking advantage of the same Medicaid program that anyone else with no assets would be using for nursing home care. He said if the state were to reopen a closed prison to create a state-run nursing home, it would not be reimbursed by the federal government.

And while the private facility in Rocky Hill would not be staffed by state correctional workers, Lawlor said he did expect the new jobs would be union positions represented by SEIU 1199.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(2) Comments

posted by: BrianO | February 22, 2013  10:01am

At what point does someone call the Corrections Officer’s Unions on tactics intended only to create or maintain more jobs while the state is in dire financial condition.  They voted down and obstructed the concession deal which did not go far enough, they put up threatening billboards if a policy is proposed regarding parole and now they want to “guard” the terminally ill and bed ridden.  It is shameful.  All during a period when crime is at a 45 year low in Connecticut.

This is possible because it is permitted in our state to articulate the threat of “pedophiles, rapists and felons.”  No one knows yet who will be housed.
Prisons in Connecticut are a jobs program, pure and simple.  In the state with the worst private sector jobs market in the country, we have the highest regional rates of incarceration.  Higher than New York, Massachusetts and New Jersey. 
The Corrections Officers Union is ruthless in keeping jobs, regardless of the direct and collateral costs of prisons.  It is a well-known secret that the majority of clients for DSS, DCF, DMHAS and many DOL programs are families impacted by the criminal justice system.  We can be smarter in how we spend our money.

posted by: dano860 | February 25, 2013  11:21am

The STATE is opening a PRIVATE facility? Really!
Vecchitto is right, use the existing facilities but SELL them to the private contractor. Get them off the State rolls and make them pay taxes.
The State has far to many empty buildings that it has to maintain. This looks like an opportunity to reduce costs on two fronts.