Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

Sedensky Won’t Appeal Order To Release 911 Tapes

by Hugh McQuaid | Dec 2, 2013 5:26pm
(1) Comment | Commenting has expired
Posted to: FOIA, Newtown

State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky III will not appeal a judge’s ruling ordering the Wednesday release of the 911 calls made during the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

Last week, Judge Eliot Prescott denied a request by Sedensky to prevent the release of the recordings. Sedensky had asked the court to issue a stay while he appealed a decision by the Freedom of Information Commission, which called on Newtown police to release the recordings to the Associated Press.

Prescott ordered the release of the tapes but gave Sedensky until Dec. 4 to appeal the ruling. Sedensky issued a short statement Monday, saying he would not appeal the ruling.

“After consultation with the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney and the attorney for the Town of Newtown who is a party to the appeal in the Superior Court, we have decided not to pursue an appeal on the denial of the application for a stay,” he said in a statement.

The tapes will be released Wednesday afternoon by attorneys for the town of Newtown.

In his decision Tuesday, Prescott dismissed Sedensky’s legal arguments for preventing disclosure of the tapes. He said delaying their release fueled speculation and undermined public confidence in law enforcement.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comment

posted by: Noteworthy | December 2, 2013  5:36pm

Sedensky’s statement didn’t offer an apology for wasting the time and money of taxpayers and corporations? Why not?