Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Upcoming Trends We Saw at CES 2015
Jan 21, 2015 8:08 am
After recording over 40 videos about individual products at International CES 2015, the burning question from many...more »
VoteTocracy Hopes to Bridge Gap Between Voters and Congress
Jan 13, 2015 11:34 am
For years, voters who wanted to learn about issues and discuss them with their elected officials in Congress have had...more »

Our Partners

SEEC Upholds Individual Limits

by Staff Report | May 15, 2014 2:03pm
(0) | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2014, Election Policy, Legal

The State Elections Enforcement Commission has decided it will continue to limit the amount of money an individual can contribute to a candidate or committee, but in light of a recent Supreme Court decision it won’t be able to enforce aggregate contribution limits.

“The Commission will not enforce the aggregate contribution limits from individuals to various committees . . . unless it receives further guidance from the legislature or a court of competent jurisdiction.”

The SEEC ruling is in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission.

The court’s decision removes the overall cap on contributions, but it does not impact the “base limits” on individual contributions.

Currently, individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per election to a federal candidate, $10,000 per calendar year to a state party committee, $32,400 per calendar year to a national party committee, and $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC.

In Connecticut, it’s $3,500 for a gubernatorial candidate, $2,000 for a constitutional officer, $1,000 for a chief elected municipal officer, probate judge, or state Senator, and $250 for state Representative candidates.

None of those limits will be changed, according to the commission’s ruling. The only limit that will be lifted based on the ruling is Connecticut’s $30,000 aggregate contribution limit for any single election or primary.

SEEC Chairman Anthony Castagna has said that he was confident that Connecticut’s clean election system would withstand the court decision.

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Be the first to comment