Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

iPad Air 2 an Incremental Step Up from the Original
Oct 22, 2014 11:45 pm
It feels like iPads have been around forever, but it has only been about four years since the original iPad’s release....more »
Video Review | Fujitsu ScanSnap ix100 Mobile Document Scanner
Oct 12, 2014 3:35 pm
Fujitsu’s ScanSnap scanners are known for scanning large volumes of documents quickly while capturing both sides of a...more »

Our Partners

˜

Segarra Defends Stadium Despite Public Opposition

by Madeline Stocker | Jul 3, 2014 8:10am
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Economics, Local Politics, Hartford, New Britain

Courtesy of the CIty of Hartford

The threads of what Hartford Mayor Pedro Segarra had formerly referred to as a “done deal” continued to unravel Wednesday evening, when he was forced to reword his original statement that building a $60 million stadium for a minor league baseball team was inevitable.

“The issue was whether the Rock Cats had decided to move to Hartford; whether it was a ‘done deal.’ In terms of them moving to Hartford and me as a mayor agreeing to receive them in the city,” Segarra said. “But I was very clear that this was subject to legislative approval.”

The statement was made during Wednesday’s two-hour public forum on the proposed stadium, during which nearly 300 people, mostly residents of Hartford, gathered at the Hartford Public Library to express concerns regarding the projected development — much of which was in opposition.

Though the “done deal” still has to be approved by the City Council, Segarra said he believed that constructing the stadium is the right choice.

“Downtown North has huge potential,” Segarra said. “We have this incredible opportunity to take this crater, this sea of highly un-utilized parking lots, and start putting up opportunities of development.”

Madeline Stocker photo

Mayor Pedro Segarra

Segarra, who was joined onstage by Thomas Deller, Director of the Department of Developmental Services for the City of Hartford, told the crowd that the construction of the stadium would create the equivalent of 665 full-time jobs and more than 900 construction jobs, and generate 23,700 hotel room stays annually.

But the document soliciting proposals for development of the area released just hours before the forum does not say that the project will employ Hartford residents. It does state that it has “targets and goals relating to local employment, job training and affirmative action.”

When she approached the microphone, Councilwoman Cynthia Jennings said that she and her fellow City Council representatives would refuse to pass the proposal if certain guidelines regarding employment and taxation were not met.

“This council is committed to this stadium only if Hartford residents don’t have a tax increase because of this, if Hartford jobs are identified for Hartford residents, and if Hartford businesses get the business that’s coming to them,” Jennings said.

In addition to the fear of a tax increase, many of the attendees admitted to feeling jarred by the mayor’s lack of transparency regarding the plans. In addition to the misleading “done deal” statement, Segarra had also announced that the $60 million dollar construction project would be backed with “borrowed money,” a financing plan that he recently amended to include private funding.

What the attendees disclosed as being even more unsettling was the fact that the past 17 months of planning for the project had been kept in secret until last month, as Segarra and other officials made their plans behind closed doors.

“Can you imagine the citizens of West Hartford, Wethersfield, Avon, or Simsbury being made aware of a big deal in this manner?” asked Ebony Murphy, who is running for lieutenant governor.

This lack of transparency led attendees of Wednesday’s forum to question Segarra’s credibility, a sentiment that culminated with one resident’s accusatory question of why she should “trust Segarra with [her] money.”

Out of the 40 residents who spoke, the majority dismissed the project outright, announcing that they doubted Segarra’s promise that the benefits of the project would outweigh the risk. From their places behind the two microphones set up for the public, several attendees denounced what they viewed as the project’s economic disparities.

“You’re doing this for the people who came in from the suburbs,” one woman said. “They treat Hartford like a toilet bowl — they come in, do their thing, and leave, and we don’t have the money to clean up after them.”

Several other residents announced that the “numbers don’t make sense,” signaling out the data released by the mayor’s office that predicted a 7,000 person attendance rate at ballgames, with 10 percent of attendees staying in Hartford hotel rooms. They suggested both statistics, and therefore the income garnered by the project, were “inflated.”

Even more questioned why the mayor felt he should allocate $60 million for a baseball stadium, while he had “done little” to amend the city’s education system, the closure of several public library branches, or the lack of public transportation.

Though he received a number of objections throughout the forum, Segarra remained outwardly positive, and continually listed the stadium’s potential to spur economic development, create jobs, and provide attractions as the major incentives for the project.

“I don’t think that the stadium is going to resolve all of the problems in our city,” Segarra said. “I can guarantee that it won’t. But I can tell you that a stadium in combination with housing, a supermarket, 1,200 units downtown, UConn, a Front Street that’s almost fully rented out and many other things that are happening can create a synergy that is needed to move a city forward.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(4) Comments

posted by: DanofiveO | July 3, 2014  9:28am

Mr. Wooden and the Mayor exemplify the self absorbed politicians Hartford can do without.
Sneaking around for eighteen months to get the Rock cats deal Wooden and the mayor coldly knifed Hartford in the back.
As Wooden and Hartford’s Mayor held their now deflated news conference the only thing missing was a “Mission accomplished”  banner overhead.  Their thinly veiled conspiracy to saddle Hartford poorest residents with the bill began to unravel quickly. Residents now learning they would be indebted for 60 million so Wooden and company could watch the game far above in a skybox, would also cost them a new privately funded Supermarket they desperately needed and they were having none of it. Wooden began to back pedal and flip flop like a drunk circus clown appearing on face the state and in a opinion piece to the courant, it was truly pathetic.
Perhaps more prophetic was as a news camera panned back on the well dressed Wooden and associates at least one could be seen wearing running sneakers with his suit.
This probably being the best idea of the deal as the man was ready to run if outraged towns people pulled out pitch forks and torches to burn down city hall.

posted by: ocoandasoc | July 3, 2014  12:32pm

Jennings is right to demand a guarantee—but it would be virtually worthless as the backers of this project have already shown a propensity for secrecy and deception. And the toilet bowl analogy is a good one as the out-of-towners who are the “movers and shakers” in Hartford are always talking about “bringing folks in from the suburbs but never seem to have an end game that does anything for residents. Then there’s the mayor’s “synergy” argument” the last refuge of a scoundrel trying to sell something really isn’t needed and is indefensible through the hard facts on their own.

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | July 3, 2014  11:33pm

DrHunterSThompson

Aren’t you glad you’re not a Hartford taxpayer?

HST

posted by: QuestionMark | July 4, 2014  1:53pm

Politicians like Mayor Pedro Segarra always think they know what’s best for their constituents until they are voted out of office for creating a problem.