Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

Senate Sends Referendum Question to Voters in 2014

by Hugh McQuaid | May 8, 2013 11:16pm
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2014, Election Policy

Hugh McQuaid photo

Sens. Anthony Musto and Michael McLachlan debate bill

The Senate approved a resolution Wednesday evening to ask voters in 2014 to amend the state constitution to give the legislature more authority over Connecticut’s election policies.

The Senate’s 22-14 vote represents the final step in a lengthy process to put a constitutional change on the ballot for voters in next year’s election.

Connecticut’s constitution includes specific language outlining aspects of the state voting process, as well as a series of reasons why a voter may obtain an absentee ballot. It limits absentee ballots to people who will be out-of-state, are disabled, or are unable to go to the polls on Election Day because of their religious beliefs.

The state’s Democratic majority and Secretary of the State Denise Merrill have sought changes to the election process. But in order to amend the constitution, the General Assembly must pass the resolution two years in a row by a simple majority or once by a three-fifths majority to put it on the ballot for voters. Both chambers passed the bill last year and the House already approved the resolution again this year.

“This is about allowing Connecticut voters to cast their ballots in a way that works better with their busy mobile lives, and in turn getting more voters to participate in democracy,” Merrill said after the Senate voted Wednesday. “Some 32 states have enacted some form of early voting or no-excuse absentee ballots and more than 30 million Americans cast their ballots early in the 2012 presidential election.”

Sen. Anthony Musto, a Trumbull Democrat who co-chairs the Government Administration and Election Committee, stressed that the resolution did not change the state’s voting laws on its own. Voters will still need to approve the amendment, and only then will lawmakers have the authority to enact new policy.

“It is not up to us here in this chamber tonight to change the constitution by ourselves,” Musto said. “It will go to a vote of our residents, and indeed that’s how it should be when we are changing our foundational document.”

Opponents of the resolution argued that the question voters will be asked to approve next year will not specify what changes the lawmakers are looking to enact if they are given the authority. Sen. Michael McLachlan, the ranking Republican on Government Administration and Election Committee, said it should be clearer what lawmakers intended to do in the future.

“We’re asking now to change the constitution for some unknown changes to election law,” he said. “The proponents are asking for a dramatic change to the constitution with an unknown next step.”

Although no-excuse absentee ballot voting is a concept that finds support on both sides of aisle, Republicans are concerned that Democrats will use the constitutional change to institute other less bipartisan policies, like voting prior to the actual Election Day or voting by mail. Democrats believe these policies will increase voter participation.

Hugh McQuaid photo

Senate Minority Leader John McKinney

McLachlan and other opponents said the question that will appear before voters on the ballot should more clearly state what the constitutional change would mean.

Under the resolution, voters will see “Shall the Constitution of the State be amended to remove restrictions concerning absentee ballots and to permit a person to vote without appearing at a polling place on the day of an election?”

Senate Minority Leader John McKinney said it should be clear to residents that they will be considering removing restrictions from the constitution and allowing lawmakers to make their own changes through the legislative process.

“There’s an obvious reason, and we all know it, why the question wasn’t posed that way. Because you don’t want to ask the people the real question because you know you won’t get a victory at the ballot. That’s pretty obvious,” he said.

In a statement, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said he supports the resolution.

“While some states are working to suppress voter turnout, we are working to encourage greater turnout by increasing penalties on any effort to block voter access and moving our electoral system into the 21st Century,” Malloy said after the vote Wednesday. “I want to thank Secretary Merrill for her partnership in our effort to update Connecticut’s election rules, remove barriers to the ballot box, and increase voter participation.”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(5) Comments

posted by: Noteworthy | May 8, 2013  11:47pm

The legislature wants more authority than they already have? They want to meddle in the elections more? Do they not have enough to do? Have they done a good job minding the issues over which they have direct and total control? Hell no. They’ve made a royal freaking mess of most things - from the gun bill that nobody understands, that causes some massive backlog at the state police to our energy policy that has us paying the highest rates in the nation; to our debt of which is the highest per capita in the nation; to education among the worst in the nation to the state budget - which is full of gimmicks, smoke,debt and waste. It is also unbalanced and exceed the spending cap by more than a half a billion dollars.

The answer is NO NO NO. Finish what’s on your plate before taking on more. Didn’t their mother teach them anything?

posted by: dano860 | May 9, 2013  7:54am

If there EVER was a better meaning to the old saying, “this is just the Camels nose under the tent”, there will never be a better one.
If they are allowed to put a vague, open ended question out for referendum and it passes we can count on this being the proverbial ‘opening of the flood gates’.
This will give the Dems the opportunity to ruin any chance of ever holding a legitimate election again.
Illegal, undocumented citizens will be voters. They will be the next group to sway how the State will operate in the future.
Election Day is the same Tuesday in November, people have plenty of time and opportunity to obtain an absentee ballot. All you need to do is call the Town Clerk, stop at the Town Offices and pick one up. Students away at college arrange to have ballots mailed to them at their schools.
If voting is that important to you making the trip to your voting place is an honorable thing to do.
If you have ever worked the polls you know that the absentee ballots are the last to be counted…and this isn’t an easy job. They are fed into the machine today but that is going to be time consuming as heck if there are hundreds or thousands of them. After 12 hours at the polls the workers are tired and want to go home. This is the time of day when errors are most likely to occur also.
Leave things alone folks, it works as is!

posted by: Chien DeBerger | May 9, 2013  8:51am

I will be voting no on this.

posted by: joemanc | May 9, 2013  11:32am

I voted by absentee ballot last year for the 1st time as I would be out of state on election day. It was a piece of cake. Have no idea what the politicians are talking about when they say states are supressing voter turnout or that this resolution will increase voter participation. Maybe the problem is the politicians, and their insane policies in this state that turn off the voters. I plan on voting no, unless I hear what exactly the politicos in Hartford plan to do should said resolution be approved.

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | May 9, 2013  8:01pm

well, it’s a bad idea. nearly everyone, unless you are a politician, know that.  i do give them credit though as they recognized the ballot issue requirement to amend the constitution.

i say i give them credit because both the “prospective” death penalty law as well as the recent gun law will be found unconstitutional eventually.

bravo!

HST