Social Networks We Use

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners

˜

Senator Takes Risk Reduction Credit Complaint to FOI

by Hugh McQuaid | Oct 9, 2013 4:00pm
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Legal, Public Safety

Hugh McQuaid Photo

Sen. Joe Markley

Sen. Joe Markley filed a complaint Wednesday with the state’s Freedom of Information Commission, claiming the Malloy administration has been stonewalling his requests for data on a Correction Department program.

Markley, a Southington Republican, began requesting information from the department on Aug. 8. He asked for details on the administration of the state’s Risk Reduction Credit program, which allows the department to award credits to inmates for participating in recidivism reduction programs. The credits can be used to reduce an inmate’s prison sentence by up to five days a month.

In a letter to the DOC’s acting commissioner, Markley requested the names of each prisoner released under the policy, the number of credits they earned, and the crime that led to their incarceration.

Two months later, Markley says he has had little in the way of response from Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s administration. He told reporters Wednesday he believes he is getting the “runaround.”

“Basically they are stonewalling at this point, in my opinion. They’re not making any reply at all,” he said.

On the day of Markley’s original request, the DOC responded with another letter telling him to refer his requests to the Offices of Legislative Research and Fiscal Analysis. Markley said he tried, but neither office had the information he sought. So he wrote back to the Correction Department.

“I believe your department has the information, as well as the responsibility to provide it; your letterhead,” he wrote to the DOC’s Freedom of Information Unit, “suggests a unit exists for that purpose.”

Markley said he was referred to the office of Michael Lawlor, the governor’s undersecretary for criminal justice policy and planning.

Lawlor has often served as the administration’s chief defender of the program, which has been controversial since it was passed in 2011. Markley was among opponents of the policy who objected to its inclusion of inmates convicted of violent crimes.

In a statement Wednesday, Lawlor said the information Markley has requested is regularly published by the administration.

“Information about offenders finishing sentences is regularly reported to the legislature and to the public and is public information. In fact, the Department of Correction and the Judicial Branch make virtually all of that information available online,” he said.

Lawlor said Markley’s request was referred to the Legislative Research Office because he asked for analysis and not data. Lawlor said the information Markley requested doesn’t exist because technically no inmates are released based solely on the Risk Reduction Credit program.

The department could not compile the list he sought because inmates “are not actually released ‘pursuant to RREC,’” Lawlor said.

However, Markley said Lawlor’s office has said nothing to him in response to his request. He wrote Wednesday to Colleen Murphy, executive director of the state’s Freedom of Information Council, to start a formal FOI complaint.

If the administration is monitoring the program, Markley said it should have easy access to the information he is looking for. He said he was not trying to be difficult.

“If they came back to me and said ‘We don’t keep the information in that form,’ if they said ‘We can provide you with X and not Y,’ I would be willing to figure out what would be reasonable to expect from them,” he said.

Markley called the DOC’s referral to the Legislative Research Office “flippant.” At one point in the letter, the department’s FOI administrator misspells his name as “Senator Marley.” He joked that the issue could have been solved “by one phone call to ‘Marley’” by Lawlor’s office.

Markley said he still had concerns that the program was being mismanaged or that it jeopardized public safety. He said he suspected that’s why he has not received the information he requested.

“I think the information may reflect poorly on the program and I think they may be concerned . . . that there is political damage that could come from revelations of problems,” he said.

Lawlor said high-risk and dangerous inmates now spend more time in prison than inmates had in the past.

“The goal of the post-Cheshire sentencing reforms enacted in 2008 and thereafter have had one principal goal: to identify high-risk, violent offenders and keep them in prison as long as is possible.  For this reason, violent offenders in Connecticut now serve a much longer portion of their original sentence than had been the case before the Cheshire murders,” he said.

Lawlor said the administration has briefed lawmakers on the department’s release policies and is willing to do so “at any time.”

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(4) Comments

posted by: ko4478 | October 10, 2013  6:32am

Welcome to the default position of the Department of Correction Senator, deny, lie, and cover-up anything that might be embarrassing or unlawful. It has always been thus.

Through the “RT” screen system, the amount of “GOOD TIME” received by any inmate is accessible to thousands of DOC employees in seconds so why not a State Senator?

Perhaps the Senator should ask for the “time sheet” as it is commonly referred to by the inmates (but is really a specific “RT” command on the computer system) of 100 random violent felons to see how much “Good time” they Have “EARNED”.

Good luck, The walls are high and few people and little information gets out unless the keeper allows it, FOI laws be damed!

posted by: UConnHoop | October 10, 2013  7:20am

I’m shocked that the lefties and the “good government” people aren’t outraged about this stonewalling.  Shocked, I tell ya!

posted by: donpesci | October 10, 2013  8:51am

“In a letter to the DOC’s acting commissioner, Markley requested the names of each prisoner released under the policy, the number of credits they earned, and the crime that led to their incarceration… Lawlor said the information Markley requested doesn’t exist because technically no inmates are released based solely on the Risk Reduction Credit program.”

No, Mr. Lawlor is not interested in compiling such data because it might show fault lines in his “get out of jail early” program. And so the information is buried in plain sight in the usual informational haysack.

Mr. Lawlor’s program dispensed early release credits to a) criminals who never took advantage of the presumed remedial aspects of the program; the credits were awarded retroactively, and b) violent criminals, one of whom, Frankie Resto, murdered a storekeeper in Meriden with a gun that fell through the net recently constructed by the governor and the legislature, a gun bill the provisions of which did not secure the safety of the murdered storekeeper. The same thing happened in Manchester.

With some exceptions, Connecticut’s media has been snoozing on Mr. Lawlor’s poorly constructed program. A full account of Mr. Lawlor’s program may be found here:  http://donpesci.blogspot.com/search?q=resto

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | October 15, 2013  4:07pm

i thought that under the FOIA you had to request a specific public record?isn’t that right?  It sounds like the Senator is asking for information that may need to be compiled, no?

if that is the case, then it is not a public record yet, it needs to be compiled.  therefore it cannot be the subject of an FOI request, right? It is something else.

HST