Social Networks We Use


CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut Consumers to Begin Receiving E-Book Settlement Refunds
Mar 25, 2014 4:09 pm
Connecticut residents will start receiving refund checks or credits this week for e-books purchased between April 1,...more »
Like New Jersey, Direct Retail Sales of Tesla Automobiles Not Allowed in Connecticut
Mar 19, 2014 12:24 pm
The Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection is co-sponsoring a contest for the auto dealership...more »

Our Partners


Senators’ Message On Gun Violence Welcomed, But Belated

by Hugh McQuaid | Jan 11, 2013 6:49pm
(3) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Town News, Hartford, Newtown, Public Safety

Hugh McQuaid photo

U.S. Sens. Chris Murphy and Richard Blumenthal

Connecticut’s two U.S. senators see the national attention generated by the Newtown shootings as an opportunity to address gun violence. To begin that process, they heard Friday from a community that’s no stranger to the subject: Hartford’s North End.

U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy held a roundtable discussion Friday afternoon at the Parker Memorial Community Center in Hartford. The panel included elected leaders as well as law enforcement officials, mental health professionals, and faith leaders.

The senators also heard from members of the community, many of whom had lost family members to gun violence in Hartford.

Samuel Saylor lost his son, Shane, after he was shot in late October. He said the shooting that left 26 people dead at Sandy Hook Elementary School last month has left Connecticut with a feeling he’s had since his son’s death: a sense that he can “never go home.”

Despite skepticism expressed by some of his neighbors, Saylor said he was holding out hope that this time the violence will actually motivate change.

“I’m with you. I don’t have any skepticism. I can only afford myself hope because I have other children . . . I’ll walk wherever you walk, I’ll stand wherever you stand and I’ll be wherever you want me to be,” he said.

Not everyone was so optimistic. Several people expressed frustration that it took a mass shooting to get officials talking about gun violence, when their community has been dealing with it for years.

Rev. Henry Brown, who has organized marches on the state Capitol to protest violence, chastised lawmakers for waiting until the Newtown shootings before getting serious about gun violence.

“I’m not here to be friends with nobody . . . I heard Sen. Blumenthal say ‘20 families grieving,’ when in the past 11 years I have seen 330 people grieve,” Brown said. “. . . What happened down in Newtown? Oh man, we grieve just as much as anybody in Newtown is grieving.”

Brown said he didn’t see any of the people on the panel when he was marching on the Capitol. He said he expected the concern created by Newtown to dissipate, leaving Hartford facing the same gun problems it has been facing for years.

“Do something. Stop talking,” Brown shouted. “. . . God knows, if Newtown didn’t happen, ain’t none you would be here today.”

Pastor Marichal Monts of the Citadel of Love Church said it’s been a challenge to serve as a pastor in Hartford and to oversee funerals for children lost to violence. He hoped the conversation would lead to action. He said guns in cities is an issue that needs to be addressed, but he wished that change had come about sooner.

“It hurts that it has to happen in the suburbs for everybody to get excited,” Monts said.

Following the discussion, Murphy said it shouldn’t take something as awful as what happened in Newtown to get the country paying attention to gun violence.

“I understand some of the frustration that you hear here in Hartford, but frankly you’ve heard it all across the country,” Murphy said. “We need to seize this moment and do something on gun violence that makes a difference for elementary schools as well as inner cities.”

Blumenthal agreed, saying he’s been concerned about the problem for decades.

“I think it’s part of the reason we’re holding these forums, to give a broader perspective to these issues,” he said. “It’s not about a single place or one community. It’s about the nation.”

The two senators said they plan to hold similar panels in other Connecticut cities as the legislative session continues.

Murphy told the audience he understood their skepticism, but said the discussion they were having would help convince their colleagues in Congress that action is needed.

“We’re going to get something changed because we’re able to bring your stories, what you’re telling us, to Washington and change peoples’ minds,” he said.

Earlier Friday, Murphy and Blumenthal sent Vice President Joe Biden their recommendations for the package Biden will give to President Barack Obama on Tuesday.

The recommendations called for imposing an expanded assault weapons ban, including a ban on high-capacity magazines. They also recommended improving the background check system and expanding the use of it on individuals seeking to purchase ammunition.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

(3) Comments

posted by: Noteworthy | January 12, 2013  9:51pm


1. I can think of no bigger waste of time than this “roundtable.”

2. Gun violence in poor, black neighborhoods have a completely different genesis than Sandy Hook. Pretending they are the same is a rather silly excerise in pandering because of the political optics. The North End is plagued with chronic, crushing poverty, drugs, gangs, domestic violence and all manner of insecurity from jobs to housing to food. People who get killed here are usally one-offs and are done in by a handgun.

On the other hand, Sandy Hook is a wealthy, largely white, stable enclave of large homes whose families lack for nothing. The people killed here were mowed down with an assault rifle by a kid with mental problems, a father who was absent and uninvolved and a mother so self absorbed she didn’t understand the dangers of having a large cache of laoded weapons unlocked in her home with such a kid.

3. What has been proposed by these two senators is among other things, a ban on the large clips, a ban on the assault rifle and background checks to buy bullets. None of those proposed solutions do anything substantive about the problem in Sandy or the North End.

USA Today had an interesting article this week on the difficulty of getting the disturbed people locked up in mental institutions. It needs money, facilities and law changes.

As for the problems in the North End - Operation Longevity holds some promise but not much. Getting guns off the streets is a matter of burglary and gun running; of drug wars, gangs and poverty. Where do you want to start and hasn’t somebody been working on this problem already?

posted by: dano860 | January 14, 2013  12:10am

Noteworthy nailed it once again.
Follow the successful results of the “War on Drugs” and you’ll find a parallel to the gun crimes in the cities.
Why is it that the people that witness these crimes never speak up either. They are guilty of promoting these crimes too.
Stop the illegal use of EBT cards and you’ll slow down some of the stolen gun trade. They get cash for phony purchases then buy stolen firearms.
It isn’t a problem of legally purchased ones.
There is NO background check for a stolen gun.

posted by: sightover | January 14, 2013  8:32am

Most legislators haven’t shown much concern over children being killed in our cities, but the prejudice that lies at the heart of that willful neglect is now being supplanted by another manifestation of ignorance and prejudice: a hatred of “caveman,” “redneck” gun owners. Rather than take the blame for gutting our mental health system, the elected class is going to scapegoat decent people for owning weapons while ignoring REAL solutions that might prevent another mass murder (or series of single murders).

In a bizarre twist, the idea to make public gun-owners’ home addresses may help kill more children of color by putting once-legal guns on the streets in the hands of gangbangers: