CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

State To Invest $19.2M In Waterbury

by | Jul 7, 2014 4:57pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Election 2014, Local Politics, Waterbury

Christine Stuart photo Gov. Dannel P. Malloy delivered some good news to the most distressed municipality in the state Monday when he announced that the state planned to spend about $19.2 million in Waterbury buying up properties, renovating old ones, and improving transportation options.

The project, which is being nicknamed “Waterbury Next,” includes a handful of ideas from redeveloping the historic Howland Hughes building for $5 million to demolition of the long-closed Prospect Street garage for $1.2 million. The project also includes about $4 million in infrastructure improvements, $1 million to purchase a brownfield, $1 million to purchase the historic Rose Hill campus, and $25,000 for pre-development of the Brown Building. The total cost of those projects is about $12.2 million.

Monday’s announcement was made under a tent on the city green.

The state also plans to spend about $6 million to $7 million on improving the signalization for the Waterbury branch of the New Haven Rail Line.

The Waterbury branch is the only portion of the Metro-North service area that does not have a signal system. That, combined with the fact that much of the branch only has one track, prevents more trains from being operated on the line.

“Without signals we can’t add any more services,” Transportation Commissioner James Redeker said. “And this line needs more service and this town deserves more service as the transit hub that it is.”

All the projects will be paid for through state bonding, according to state officials.

Waterbury Mayor Neil O’Leary said he expected the projects to “unlock significant private investment by all downtown property owners as we change the environment and economics to make it worth their while to do so.”

He said that at the end of the day, stakeholders throughout the region are working together “for the good of the City of Waterbury.”

Some of the projects that will receive state funding have been in the works for more than a year, while some like the demolition of the parking garage and the acquisition of the Rose Hill campus were just announced on Monday.

O’Leary said it has taken a long time to put some of the projects together and he was distracted with the failed merger of Waterbury Hospital and St. Mary’s Hospital during the first 10 months of his tenure as mayor.

However, since getting elected in 2011, O’Leary said Malloy has had an open door and is willing to speak about investment in the city.

“Let’s be very honest, our older, urban environments in Connecticut bare the scars and the sweat of the industrial revolution,” Malloy said. “And it’s time to clean those up so that those spaces can be put back to good use.”

As far as Waterbury being a battleground in the 2014 election. . .

“The whole state’s a battleground for God’s Sake,” Malloy said. “We’re going to be all over the state in campaigns. That’s what campaigns are. It’s a battle for the future of the state of Connecticut.”

In the 2010 race, Malloy beat Republican Tom Foley in Waterbury by about 1,728 votes. He went on to win the election by a slim 6,404 votes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |


(7) Archived Comments

posted by: dano860 | July 7, 2014  6:46pm

Bond us deeper into debt just to buy more votes!
They have a lot of nerve filing a bogus complaint against Foley.

posted by: shinningstars122 | July 7, 2014  10:35pm


Hey @Dano860 sorry to burst your teaparty bubble but bonding is how things get done in our country.

I mean you think the Koch brothers would pay to redo the mixmaster?

Or repave Main street in your home town?

Plus banks and lenders make money when cities and towns bond projects.

It is one of the mighty cogs of the happy world of capitalism.

posted by: oliviahuxtable | July 8, 2014  6:01am

Spending money at election time…every incumbent does it. Why be surprised?

posted by: Greg | July 8, 2014  10:32am

Waterbury is beyond saving. Anyone with even modest means has already fled, or is planning to flee but is hamstrung by declining housing prices and a lack of buyers to unload their homes to.  Taxes- beyond punitive.

oh No! the Koch Brothers boogeyman!  I don’t see George Soros or Warren Buffet ponying up to rebuild the mixmaster or repave main street either, so that little quip falls right on its face.

posted by: dano860 | July 8, 2014  12:39pm

@SS122, as intelligent as you portend to be I hate to burst your know all / see all bubble. I am a long way from a tea party person. Conservative/ libertarian might be the best I can ascribe to.
Bonding is a given for many defined projects but when a person in Dannel’s position pretends to be the savior of a lost city, without any defined projects, that is nothing more than an attempt to buy votes. Heck, Waterbury would still elect Rowland for mayor if he ran. It’s tough to get the Democrat edge in that town.

posted by: Noteworthy | July 8, 2014  1:57pm

We need reverse campaign laws in this state - something that bars governors from taking from all taxpayers in order to buy votes from some taxpayers.

posted by: Greg | July 8, 2014  4:56pm

Despite Rowlands state $$$ largesse towards waterbury the city is still in decline.  Old brownfields turned into middle-market retail, which then declined into dollar store-type retail then to empty boxes.  The cronyism at the Chase Building and City Hall is for the record books; “old waterbury” names don’t ever seem to want to leave their little fiefdoms while anyone with means can barely sell their houses to gtfo. Santopietro, Giordano, Rowland…all dirty, some more than others.  All from Waterbury.

Such a sad story despite the history and even the architecture. Malloy’s little ploy is nothing more than buying votes as so many have said.

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages