Recent Comments

Categories

  • Cartoons
    • Rell and Her Vetoes
    • Moral Compass
    • Gas Prices on the Rise
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Accused Johns Plead in Prostitution Sting
    • In Foreclosure, Judge's Hands Tied
    • Fighting Foreclosure on Cornwall Street
  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Election 2008
    • Rosa's 9 Sentences In The Limelight
    • Quick Update From the DNC Floor
    • Local Delegates Take Deep Breath
  • Environment
    • Environmental Groups Mad at Rell's Proposed Changes
    • Wind Turbines Pitched In New Haven
    • DeLauro Sees 'Perfect Storm' on Oil
  • General News
    • Rell Delivers The Check to Common Ground
    • Kirkley-Bey on ending the cycle of violence in Hartford
    • City Youth Strut Their Stuff
  • Health Care
    • Rell Prepared to Ignore Council's Recommendation
    • Decision To Join Charter Oak
      Not Easy For State Hospital
    • Five More Hospitals Enroll In Charter Oak
  • Iraq at Home
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
    • Lindorff Makes a Case for Impeachment
  • Labor
    • Yale-New Haven Hospital Hands Union $2M
    • Fighting to Keep Living Wage Law in Manchester
    • Protesters Dog Hartford Schools Superintendent as Unions Fight Tooth and Nail for Jobs, Benefits
  • Legal
    • "Democracy Victory" At VA
    • Challenging Connecticut's Bail Bond System. Is it Constitutional?
    • News Analysis: FOI Request Reveals How School Officials Came Across the "Douche Bag" Comment
  • Local Politics
    • Clergy and Gov's Office Weigh in on Hartford Violence
    • Hartford Rallies Against Violence
    • Hartford Mayor Writes Governor and Chief Justice
  • Media Matters
    • New Haven Independent Interviewed in New York Times Story
    • Tell Zell Unveils Courant Buyout List
    • Newspaper Reductions Prompt Class Action
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • State Capitol
    • Heating Assistance Bill Passes in Special Session
    • Lawmakers Still Working Out the Details
    • Special Session Starts with Pomp and Circumstance

Hartford Has Some Explaining to Do

by Christine Stuart | July 10, 2007 9:54 PM
Posted to Courts | Legal | Local Politics

Ken Krayeske photo

The legislature’s Education Committee will ask Hartford Mayor Eddie Perez on Thursday why the city refuses to sign off on the updated Sheff v. O’Neill agreement to reduce racial isolation Hartford Schools.

During the first forum on June 20, Education Committee members and Hartford’s Corporation Counsel John Rose Jr. got into a heated argument over the city’s reluctance to sign the agreement, which sets ambitious goals to reduce racial isolation in Hartford Schools.

Last week the plaintiff’s in the landmark desegregation lawsuit grew impatient with the state’s reluctance to sign it without the city’s approval and asked the court to get involved again in settling the dispute. The plaintiff’s motion will be considered by Superior Court Judge Marshall K. Berger Jr., who decided on May 29 that the state should spend approximately $112 million more than it currently does to address racial isolation and academic achievement in Hartford area schools over the next five years.

Sen. Andrew McDonald, D-Stamford, said during the June 20 meeting that he’s confused about why the city would intervene in the lawsuit and participate in the negotiations, but refuse to sign the tentative agreement between the plaintiff’s and the state.

Rose said the city is not backing away from its obligations under the agreement by not signing it. He said the city of Hartford will still do what it, is required to do under the agreement, even though it will not sign the agreement because it is considering its own lawsuit.

Rose said the problem is the city spends “Millions of dollars every year to facilitate an agreement we had nothing to do with creating.” He said the school board doesn’t want to be held liable to reduce racial isolation by a certain percentage, if it doesn’t believe it’s reasonable to achieve those numbers.

According to the first Sheff settlement, 30 percent of Hartford students were supposed to be enrolled in racially integrated schools by this year, but recent research shows it that only 9 percent of the city’s students attend schools that have enough white students to qualify as racially integrated under the 2003 Sheff agreement.

Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, said he was concerned that either Rose or Mayor Perez didn’t bring the settlement agreement to the city council for approval.

“The Mayor’s office and my office had reservations about the agreement,” Rose said.

Thursday’s meeting between Hartford officials and the Education Committee will be held at 2 p.m. in Room 2C of the Legislative Office Building.