Bridgeport Refuses Vote Audit
by Christine Stuart | Nov 17, 2010 12:22am
(7) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2010
(Updated) On Monday Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz said the Bridgeport Registrar of Voters agreed to a voluntary audit of a dozen voting districts, but Tuesday evening Bridgeport’s attorney’s said that’s absolutely not going to happen.
In a joint statement Bridgeport Attorney Mark Anastasi and Deputy City Attorney Arthur Laske said Anastasi spoke with an attorney in the elections division of Bysiewicz’s office Monday afternoon to tell them “no one in the city had agreed to such a recount.“
Bysiewicz’s office has no legal authority to force them to do an audit of those polling places. She said Wednesday morning that those 12 polling places were included in the random drawing of 74 polling places for the statewide audit, but none of them were chosen.
It was unclear from Monday’s press conference if those polling places were included in the drawing because Bysiewicz said that the Bridgeport Registrars of Voters had agreed on Nov. 9 to participate in a voluntary audit.
“It seems the Secretary was mistaken both as to whom her office spoke with from the City of Bridgeport and what was said on Monday,” Anastasi and Laske said, adding that the Bridgeport Registrars of Voters had preliminary discussions with Deputy Secretary of the State Leslie Mara about the subject, and none of the 12 polling places were picked Monday in the random audit drawing.
While a voluntary audit may ensure confidence in the results of the governor’s race, Anatasi and Laske said “The City can find no legal authority which either requires or even allows the State or the City to conduct such a recount.”
“We believe that the Secretary of the State is equally aware of this absence of legal authority,” the two attorney’s said.
The statement from Bridgeport comes the same evening the bipartisan panel to examine the city’s election procedures process met to hear from voters about what happened on Nov. 2.
Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch said the ballot shortage necessitated the use of photocopied ballots which needed to be hand counted.
The ballot shortage, a court order which allowed the polls to stay open in the Park City for an additional two hours, and the hand counting ultimately delayed the results of the closest governor‘s race in decades.
“This process, which was difficult on all the overtaxed poll workers, was nonetheless completed by the following morning, Wednesday, Nov. 3, with the exception of one precinct where the health considerations of poll workers required the final count to be done Thursday evening,“ Finch said. “Despite the release of an irresponsible report that these uncounted ballots were not disclosed to the parties or were improperly handled, in fact the original, sealed ballots were disclosed to all campaign representatives election eve, and were placed under guard and secured from the moment they were returned to the Registrar’s office on Tuesday evening until they were publicly counted on Thursday evening.“
The final vote tally was completed Friday, Nov. 5.
“While the decision to order an inadequate number of ballots was clearly unacceptable, and was clearly the cause of virtually all the problems arising on Election Day, the City reacted well after this problem became known by quickly and with as much efficiency as possible, filling in the gaps,” Finch concluded.
Tags: election 2010, vote audit, Bridgeport, bysiewicz
(7) Comments
posted by: mattw | November 17, 2010 12:52am
An audit (which Bysiewicz ordered in 12 Bridgeport districts) is not a recount. Audits are only meant to test machine function, which, for example, means that they do not include any ballots which were hand counted originally.
In Bridgeport, audits would not answer any questions that anybody wants an answer to. Recounts (or recanvasses) can be ordered, but must be complete by the Tuesday following the election.
posted by: GoatBoyPHD | November 17, 2010 1:03am
I’ve heard Bridgeport is run like a 3rd world country but I’ve never been to a 3rd world country to monitor elections.
I’ve heard one tactic is to identify problen voting stations and to post counters (with little click counters) to get a raw body count of those who voted.
It calls attention to the fraudulemt use of registration roles to fabricate ghost votes based on body count.
CT is in need of some serious election oversight. When Afghan elections have more validity than America’s Bluest and Wealthiest State then something’s wrong.
Bring in Jimmy Carter. It can be is final and most meaningful act of public service. Restoring voting credibility to American inner cities. What mission could be more valuable?
posted by: Luther Weeks | November 17, 2010 9:19am
@GoatBoyPHD,
The Carter Center will not observe U.S. elections because they do not meet the Center’s minimum criteria. I believe one of those criteria is uniform election laws.
posted by: GoatBoyPHD | November 17, 2010 12:38pm
The Carter Center has done election reporting and standards for the Cherokee nation in the US.
I think Bridgeport and CT would look good on the below list of Carter Center clients.
Can CT Elections held to the same standards as any third world country? That ought to be some sort of validation for Bridgeport and for CT citizens.
I’m thinking one of those online petitions is in order to invite the ex-President for this act of public duty. Nothing is more sacred than voters’ trust.
Past Carter Center Clients for Election Monitoring
Bangladesh
Bolivia
China
Cote d’Ivoire
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Ethiopia
Ghana
Guatemala
Guinea
Guyana
Haiti
Indonesia
Israel and The Palestinian Territories
Jamaica
Kenya
Lebanon
Liberia
Mali
Mexico
Mozambique
Nepal
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Sierra Leone
Sudan
United States
Venezuela
Zambia
posted by: GoatBoyPHD | November 17, 2010 12:43pm
THe Carter Center also does pre-election guidance and standards setting to ensure accurate and compliant elections.
Who wants a repeat of this fiasco from 2008 in Bridgeport?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl71dL5no_0
Mpre on the Carter Center and Voter Registration
http://www.cartercenter.org/peace/democracy/index.html