Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut E-Book Customers to Receive More Rebates
May 23, 2013 8:26 am
Attorney General George Jepsen announced that e-book publisher Penguin has agreed to a price fixing settlement that...more »
3rd Annual Connecticut-Israel Technology Summit Set for June 12
May 17, 2013 3:03 pm
The MetroHartford Alliance and the Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford have announced the third annual...more »
CTNext Launches Startup Map
May 5, 2013 12:29 pm
CTNext, a public/private partnership helping the high tech startup community in the state, launched an interactive map...more »

Tag List

Correction And Police Unions Rally Against Layoffs, Prison Closure

by Christine Stuart | Aug 22, 2011 6:00am
(6) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Labor, State Budget

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Google

Christine Stuart file photo (Updated 9:39 a.m.) The $1.6 billion labor savings and concession package may have been adopted by 32 of the 34 bargaining units last week, but it won’t stop at least two unions from voicing their opinions over prison closures and possible layoffs.

Today, two of the AFSCME unions suing the state over the closure of Bergin Correctional Institute in Mansfield will hold a press conference outside Hartford Correctional Center to talk about the overcrowding that’s resulted.

The injunction filed Aug. 9 in Hartford Superior Court calls for the prison to remain open and the inmates returned.

Any time the state decides to close a prison, it raises concerns about the working conditions and the mental and physical health and safety of correctional officers, the lawsuit said.

Those dangers are generated by a lack of secured sleeping areas for inmates, necessitating the placement of large groups of inmates in make-shift sleeping areas that were never meant to be living quarters, the injunction said. This causes unrest among inmates and makes it more difficult for Correction Officers to keep an eye on them, the lawsuit says.

Prior to the 11 a.m. press conference at Hartford Correctional Center, the Connecticut State Police Union will gather at the state Capitol at 10 a.m. to voice their concerns about the statutory staffing levels it says are not being maintained. It will also ask Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to spare their 56 troopers who received layoff notices.

The Connecticut State Police Union on Friday voted down a two-year wage freeze and four years of job security, a move that exposes the unit to layoffs. The vote to reject the wage freeze and job security was 123 to 657.

Troopers supported the changes in the agreement to the health and pension benefits. That vote was 448 to 329.

According to a press release from the union the troopers plan to make a case for keeping their jobs at the Monday rally.

They will also point out that the current number of state troopers, 1,127, is below the 1,248 statutorily mandated level.

When the layoffs looked possible after the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition rejected the first labor agreement, Roy Occhiogrosso, Malloy’s senior communications official said the governor was confident the state police could handle the layoffs without a risk to the public. It will just involve state police who have been working other assignments for awhile to be moved back on the road, he said.

But Andrew Matthews, president of the Connecticut State Police Union, has said people need to realize that much of the work the state police do doesn’t involve uniformed on-the-road troopers.

“We have about 725 of our troopers that perform uniform functions. The rest of them are doing statutorily mandated jobs,” he said.

That involves sex offender investigations, the state’s elite major crimes squad, narcotics and gangs, he said.

“The public doesn’t see that on a day-to-day basis. You strip those units and you put them back on patrol, and remember we’re already 156 troopers below our high in 2009, so where do all those positions go,” he said.

The result will be either those jobs don’t get done or the taxpayers pay for trooper overtime, he said.

Meanwhile, Matthews told the Associated Press he also plans to ask the legislature to withdraw from SEBAC, the coalition of 15 unions created by the legislature to negotiate for health and pension benefits with the governor.

Matthews told the Associated Press, “the state police respect SEBAC and what they’ve accomplished, but believe their law enforcement jobs are distinctly different from most state employee positions given the serious physical risks.”

Tags: , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

(6) Comments

posted by: mollyanme | August 22, 2011  6:09am

So Sunday morning, Governor malloy shows up at the Hillstead Museum in Farmington at the Farmers Market with “2” bodyguards. Wonder if that’s time and a half for them since it was a weekend. It’s nice to know that in this bad economy, our governor is sharing the sacrifice by limiting himself to only “2” bodygaurds.

posted by: Disgruntled | August 22, 2011  7:42am

While I am no fan of the state security forces,the last people I want offering their “expert opinions” are Ben and Roy. Just bcause THEY say it,does not make it so!

“Roy Occhiogrosso, Malloy’s senior communications official said the governor was confident the state police could handle the layoffs without a risk to the public”.

posted by: davidmccluskey | August 22, 2011  10:03am

To my friends in the State Police Union, voting against the wage concessions and then insisting on the statutory maximum level of troopers is not a serious, reasonable position. The max level has not been achieved many times since the legislation was passed. In 1991, there were approx. 900 state troopers when Weicker laid off 125 state troopers which were returned once CSPU agreed to concessions. Getting out of SEBAc may sound attractive, but will hurt the pension + health care package of State Troopers in the long run. David McCluskey - 7 years w/ CSPU staff.

posted by: Disgruntled | August 22, 2011  10:27am

Just two bodyguards? Did you count the driver? The Nutmeg King likes to be driven now. Last I heard he had a four-man contingent.

posted by: sharewhut | August 22, 2011  3:03pm

@davidmcclusky,
The need isn’t to break totally out of SEBAC, but to separate the pension aspects in the negotiations. Rather than being a Hazardous Duty subsection of the tier plans, have a stand alone HD plan (much as AAUP has their alternate plan). Even keep terms as they are within the current tiers,just have it broken out in the negotiations and membership voting.

posted by: timelord | August 23, 2011  12:01pm

The Governor needs to stay true to his threats and keep the layoffs of state troopers.  In fact, he should lay off even more of them and then prohibit overtime unless there’s a declared state of emergency.