Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

New Bariatric Coach Uses Every Means Available To Reach Her Clients
Feb 1, 2012 5:00 am
The ground-breaking bariatric surgeries that have become a common treatment for obesity can change lives in a matter...more »
White House Chief Technology Officer Offers Progress Report Before Announcing Departure
Jan 29, 2012 2:07 pm
The Obama administration has been working behind the scenes over the last few years to upgrade information technology...more »
Colin McEnroe Show: SOPA & PIPA: A Guide to Internet Censorship
Jan 19, 2012 3:45 pm
CTTechJunkie’s Lon Seidman appeared on the Colin McEnroe Show today to discuss what happens next in the SOPA / PIPA...more »

Tag List

Fedele: ‘My Proposal Will Not Look At Revenue’

by Christine Stuart | Mar 17, 2010 4:17pm
(2) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2010

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Christine Stuart photo Lt. Gov. Michael Fedele tried to separate himself from the pack of gubernatorial candidates seeking the Republican nomination Wednesday by boldly announcing, if elected, he will not propose tax increases.

“My proposal will not look at revenue,” Fedele said at a Capitol press conference. “We need to look at cutting the size of government and spending.”

The budget the next governor is expected to inherit will need to close a nearly $4 billion deficit.

“If you give me a Republican majority in both chambers I will pledge to you no tax increase,” Fedele said.

Fedele’s budget plan also includes imposing a four-year hiring freeze, bringing the hiring practices of the state university system and the University of Connecticut under the control of the executive branch, eliminating bonding for municipal projects, and eliminating discretionary funds like longevity bonuses. He said the state also needs to look at restructuring state employee pensions and benefits.

In addition to setting out his own agenda Wednesday, Fedele attempted to distance himself from Gov. M. Jodi Rell by talking about how there are disagreements on some issues behind closed doors, but in public he supports her positions.

“There are not all times we agreed and there are not all times we disagreed, but at the end of the day there’s only one governor,” Fedele said.

“Her style of governing is going to be very different than my style of governing,” Fedele said. “I’m not running in anyone’s shadow I’m running as Mike Fedele.”

One of Fedele’s opponents, Tom Foley of Greenwich, said as lieutenant governor Fedele had his chance to governor. 

“Mike Fedele has been Lieutenant Governor for more than three years and until now he has offered no plan to steer the state out of its current fiscal crisis,” Foley said in an emailed statement.

“As Lieutenant Governor he is in position to make a difference now and yet it has taken the pressure of an election campaign and outside voices from his own party to force him into producing a plan,” Foley said.

Click here to read Foley’s budget plan.

Share this story with others.

Share |

(2) Comments

posted by: CT Jim | March 18, 2010  7:20am

So let me get this straight this guy thinks the state is turning red right in front of and inspite of the citizens of the state?
Then he wants all hiring to be done by the Governors office so he can hire more republicans in $100,000 plus do nothing jobs and this is good leadership???
Hey Mikey why don’t you go up one floor and ask your partner to lay off her political appointees to save money?? Can’t do it can you??
If not for the fact you have zero chance of being Governor you would be one scary person.

posted by: City Hall Watch | March 18, 2010  10:15am

I’m not sure you can balance the whole budget by cutting expenses only, but I can tell you this. There is no sense of budget reality at the universities - fees, tuition and costs are out of control. At the same time, it’s critical to look at expenses first and to cut substantially into that bloated wasteland in Hartford.

CT Jim: I really don’t understand why you keep saying what you. It doesn’t make sense and the truthfulness of it is pretty questionable. Why not give some specifics to those generalizations?