Foley Talks About How He Would Handle Budget

by Christine Stuart | Mar 3, 2010 1:55pm
(2) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2010

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Christine Stuart photo Exactly three months after announcing  he would switch from the U.S. Senate race to the governor’s race, Tom Foley, held his first Capitol press conference.

“This is a press conference. I’m sorry that the last time I was with you there was a misunderstanding about the format,” Foley joked as he opened the press conference.

He said he called the press conference to talk about his concerns regarding jobs and “out of control spending in Hartford.”

At the outset Foley said he believes the state should be looking to cut $1 billion in spending, however, as the press conference progressed he only specifically identified about $190 million in cuts that he would make.

“I don’t agree though with those who say everything should be on the table. The governor and legislature should agree at the outset that expense reductions won’t be made at the expense of our children’s futures or our most needy citizens,” Foley said.

Some of the spending reductions Foley would make include discontinuing the Citizens’ Election Program, which makes public grants to candidates who meet the qualifications of the clean elections program. Foley says the state could save $60 million by ending the program.

He also advocated for shifting state services to private contractors to save the state money. He said private providers have said they can provide similar services to Riverview Hospital clients and save the state $40 million.

It’s unclear exactly where those savings may come from since the state would be unable to lay off any of the displaced workers until the end of fiscal year 2011.

Foley said he also thinks the state legislature should be working to roll back some of the close to 60 health insurance mandates it requires companies to cover in the state. When pressed he wouldn’t say exactly which ones he would support eliminating.

He also mentioned closing Southbury Training School for the intellectually disabled and moving the patients there to a community based setting for a savings of about $90 million.

Altogether Foley identified about $190 million in savings, out of the $1 billion he advocated cutting.

He also distanced himself from Gov. M. Jodi Rell on several issues. “She’s done a great job during difficult circumstances,” Foley said. He said he would have vetoed the two-year budget proposal she allowed to become law without her signature and didn’t approve of her proposal to create a Keno lottery game, so that the state has a stream of revenue to borrow against. He said focusing on new revenue streams is simply a distraction.

But he heaped most of the blame on the legislature’s Democratic-majority, saying they’ve been unwilling to even talk about the magnitude of the problem.

Foley is one of six Republicans seeking the nomination. The other candidates include Lt. Gov. Michael Fedele, Oz Griebel, Chester First Selectman Tom Marsh, Newington Mayor Jeff Wright, and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton.

Share this story with others.

Share |

(2) Comments

posted by: Martha H | March 3, 2010  3:58pm

Martha H

Once before, as a chief government administrator, Foley tried to privatize everything in sight.  Didn’t work so well.

In Iraq.

From Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s best seller, “Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone”:

“A month after arriving, Foley told a contractor from Bearing Point [a GOP-connected criminal consulting firm] that he intended to privatize all of Iraq’s state-owned enterprises within thirty days.”

“Tom, there are a couple of problems with that,” the contractor said. “The first is an international law that prevents the sale of assets by an occupation government.”

“I don’t care about any of that stuff,” Foley told the contractor, according to her recollection of the conversation. “I don’t give a shit about international law. I made a commitment to the president that I’d privatize Iraq’s businesses.”

******

FYI - At the same time he was cutting deals to sell Iraq, Foley’s sister was ALSO in Baghdad, representing a big American bank looking for big business.  Hmm…

posted by: Matt W. | March 3, 2010  5:24pm

Don’t waste our time Tom. $190 isn’t going to get it done so if you think we should cut $1B then man up and take a stand on some specifics.  If not, step aside and let someone who’s more serious about the job present something.

It’s fine that not everything is on the table so long as you’re willing to make the needed cuts in other areas b/c one thing is certain, tax increases are not on the table. 

This is a time for serious people who can present clear solutions to our spending problems. Do that and you’ll have my vote.