Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

SpaceX Successfully Launches First Commercial Mission to the Space Station
May 22, 2012 10:39 pm
SpaceX successfully launched a Falcon 9 rocket and a Dragon cargo capsule to the International Space Station at 3:44...more »
Behind the Video Episode 3 With Guest Lauren Francesca
May 22, 2012 2:17 pm
This week on the show: TV Networks announce their new fall lineup, Harry Potter casts a spell on Amazon, and Toy Story...more »
Podcast | Mark Lassoff of LearnToProgram.TV
May 21, 2012 9:38 pm
Mark Lassoff is the founder of LearnToProgram.TV, a Vernon-based company offering online programming training classes...more »

Tag List

How Is Education Like A Tripod?

by Christine Stuart | Mar 7, 2012 12:33am
(6) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Education

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Google

Christine Stuart photo WEST HARTFORD—The size of the audience at Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s second Education Town Hall swelled to nearly 400, which was more than the Charter Oak International Academy auditorium could hold. With so many still clamoring to get into the event, the West Hartford Fire Marshal had to turn many away.

The event was packed with teachers, who were largely unhappy with a handful of the proposals Malloy included as part of his 163-page education reform package.

Christine Stuart photoScott Minnick, a Glastonbury teacher and a member of the East Hampton Board of Education, told Malloy that education is like a camera tripod trying to balance the academic success of our children.

“We all agree that tripod needs to be fixed,” Minnick said.

“You’re trying to repair this tripod under the assumption that one leg should carry more weight than the other two,” he said.

The tripod consists of teachers and schools, students, and parents.

“I don’t understand how concentrating on the leg of the teachers is going to compensate for the weakness of this socioeconomic problem that exists,” Minnick said as he was interrupted by applause.

“I fundamentally disagree with you that we’re putting more weight on any one of those legs,” Malloy replied.

“You can’t deny that we have 30 underperforming school districts educating 41 percent of our students and employing 37 percent of our teachers. And you can’t deny that in each of those towns, or most of those towns, there are schools that are in fact working pretty well,” Malloy said.

“What we’ve been unwilling to do or unable to do is replicate winning experiences,” Malloy said. “If we don’t rally to the cause of doing a better job then there’ll be no reason for your children to stay here because there will be no jobs for them to pursue.”

“We cannot accept excuses when we are failing 40 to 60 percent of our students,” Malloy said.

Another teacher asked Malloy how counting standardized tests scores toward teacher evaluations will improve and enrich a student’s education.

Under the new evaluation system adopted by a state panel an administrator’s observation counts as 40 percent of the rating. Student performance counts as 45 percent, and parent and student feedback and school performance makes up the rest.

Malloy started by reminding him that the evaluation system he’s referring to was agreed to by both of the state’s teachers unions. Both unions continue to support the evaluation system, but have problems with how it will be tied to tenure, certification and wages in Malloy’s legislation.

Christine Stuart photo Malloy said the evaluation guidelines adopted by the state panel put less of an emphasis on student tests than other states that have looked at this issue.

The teacher felt Malloy didn’t answer his question so he asked again for two very specific ways tying teacher evaluations and salaries will improve student performance.

“It forces people to perform to exemplary levels as opposed to non-exemplary levels,” Malloy said. “Recognizing teachers for their greatness and not requiring them to leave the classroom to get advancement. Number three making teachers happier understanding that every teacher is reaching to be exemplary.”

“I asked for ways it would enrich the students,“ the teacher corrected Malloy.

Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman, whose job it is to handle the crowd at the microphone, jumped in and reminded the group that there was only a half-hour left and many more questions to be asked.

The crowd booed.

“If you just ignore me, you’re not going to get it this way,” Wyman warned.

Malloy jumped in and asked the teacher if he thought students wouldn’t benefit from having exemplary teachers. “Do you honestly believe that won’t bring about higher student achievement?”

“And if you don’t believe that won’t bring forth higher student achievement then what are we having this discussion for? Should we just maintain the status quo?”

The teacher felt Malloy was dodging his question.

“You might not like my answer but I’ve done the best I can,” Malloy said inviting the teacher to send him an email.

Aside from the teachers, West Hartford lawmakers like Education Committee Co-Chairman Rep. Andrew Fleischmann and Sen. Beth Bye were in attendance Tuesday.

Fleischmann said he took notes as teachers spoke and some of the issues in the bill he will be looking at include oversight of administrator’s conducting evaluations. He said daycare and family resource centers and the role they play are other areas he’s going to look at after Tuesday’s town hall meeting.

“There were a lot of good ideas that certainly I’m going to be mulling over,” Fleischmann said.

“I think it’s so important that the governor’s out listening and he’s really hearing where people are,” Bye said.

However, the legislature will also be able to make its mark on the legislation by changing or modifying parts of the bill.

“It’s with us now, so we’re all listening too,” Bye said.

She said the West Hartford delegation met with teachers over the weekend and Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor Tuesday to talk about what they want to see in the bill.

Fleischmann very firmly noted that the legislature is a separate and co-equal branch of government.

“Folks elect me to exercise my best judgment,” he said. “So I’m attempting to do that with every section of the bill. This General Assembly is not a rubber stamp.”

Christine Stuart photo Meanwhile, outside the event five Central Connecticut State University teaching students and their professor attempted to bring issues to the public’s attention that they felt was important. The five female students made a statement against standardized tests, while their professor offered to build charter schools on everyone’s property. He seemed to be making a statement about state funding for charter schools, but would not elaborate.

The students, who are just beginning their classroom observations—the step before student teaching—said they’ve seen seventh graders unable to employ basic math skills.

Kristina Tsantiras, one of the students, said the seventh grade class she observes is learning algebra tricks so they can pass the CMT’s, but only a handful of students can actually add, subtract, and multiply.

“It’s not fair teachers are pressed so hard to pass the test,” she said.

She said students are being left behind because of the emphasis on it.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

(6) Comments

posted by: Noteworthy | March 7, 2012  11:18am

Malloy is a parrot. He can repeat what he’s been told, but he fails to grasp the underlying rationale. His inability to answer a simple question is proof once again that his so called “reforms” were hatched in the boardrooms of those who stand to gain tens of millions of dollars immediately, and many more down the road in the name of “it’s for the children.” In truth, Malloy knows nothing about education personally or professionally. While we all know education in CT especially in our urban centers needs to be overhauled, I have yet to see where anything that’s in practice now (in New Haven) or at the state level being proposed actually has a track record of success. New Haven celebrates incremental improvement in test scores but when compared to the overall cost of $17K per student, the results are pitiful. 50% graduation rates in high school; 80% drop out rates in college; 92% of graduates need remedial help in college.

Yet, look at all the money the state spends on education in the K-12 system; all the money for new schools; charter schools and tutor help. It’s freaking endless. And yet, the state as a whole and the urban centers in particular are bastions to nepotism, no bid contracts, consultants out the arse and our payrolls are swelled with legions of “special assignment” personnel and rubber rooms a/k/a re-focus rooms that cook the books on district performance.

The governor’s entire proposal is highly suspect and really reaks of the age old solution in CT - throw money at it as if we don’t throw enough money at education as it is. If money were the answer, we’d have the highest performing students in the nation. What we need is real input from front line school personnel on real fixes and a lot less from those who game the system for more money or stand to gain millions and millions of dollars under the pretense of “reform.”

posted by: ... | March 7, 2012  11:47am

...

Noteworthy: “I have yet to see where anything that’s in practice now (in New Haven) or at the state level being proposed actually has a track record of success.” How can something being proposed (thus new) be already in practice, or have a track record in the state? That honestly does not make any sense to me. That basically taking every invention (ideas, products, theories, etc.) of mankind and questioning the originator before he can even explain or test product. We’d still be living in a dark, flat, isolated, geocentric world.

But then again, reading the bill is always good, since news articles only summarize events and broaden the bill’s goals (which is why it’s great CTNJ promotes most of their education articles with a pdf of the bill).

posted by: Jasper Havoc | March 7, 2012  1:34pm

Wouldn’t a tripod supported by teaches, schools, students. and parents, actually be a table?

posted by: Matt W. | March 7, 2012  5:52pm

Matt W.

This is interesting.  Mr. Minnick seems to be suggesting that the problem in the underperforming districts may have more to do with the students & parents rather than the schools or teachers. 

His problem is that you don’t get re-elected by telling parents that they are part of the problem (even when its true).  If you want votes you’ve got to blame the system, while isolating yourself from responsibility for it (focus on the teachers) and then you say that you can fix it.  That’s how you get re-elected.

The dirty little secret here is that teachers aren’t much different b/w well performing and poorly performing districts.  What’s different are the parents and by extension the students. They are underperforming and all the teacher carrot and stick programs in the world won’t change that.

posted by: brutus2011 | March 8, 2012  8:41am

brutus2011

to “Steve Jones:”
Your post is symptomatic of why public education has become such a conundrum. And I do not mean to disparage your viewpoint, only to point out that its sincerity is undermined because you obviously are clueless about what happens in our schools-especially our urban schools.
“Noteworthy” obviously speaks from first-hand experience and should be taken seriously.

posted by: silverpjs | March 15, 2012  1:10pm

The Governor uses the ConnCan method of interpreting statistics. He can not answer the question because they have brought in these people from Wisconsin, Chicago, New Jersey etc for a specific purpose. They don’t seem ready to reveal what is really behind the plan nor why it is so important to spring things on people at the last minute and try to rush this through. When the state panel on this has about 12 members that are from reform groups and only 1 from AFT and 1 from CEA it can hardly be said they they agreed to it. More likely they were bullied into accepting it.