Insurance Hikes Targeted
by Christine Stuart | Feb 19, 2010 6:00am
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Health Care, State Capitol
Connecticut figured prominently in this report released Thursday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It was one of four states where insurance companies requested and received double digit increases in health insurance rates last year.
While officials in President Barack Obama’s administration seemed poised to use the report to jumpstart its stalled health care reform proposals, Connecticut officials used it to promote legislation that will require the Insurance Department to hold public hearings and notify consumers about proposed rate increases.
The Connecticut bill would also require the Insurance Department to take some type of action on every proposed rate increase. Currently it doesn’t need to take any action and the proposed rate increase will automatically go into effect.
“I have always been skeptical of the State Insurance Department’s claim that it lacks the tools and authority necessary to dig deep on rate increase requests,“ Kevin Lembo, the state’s Healthcare Advocate said Thursday. “More often than not, the companies get exactly what they ask for.”
As proof Lembo offered this Dec. 14, 2009 Office of Legislative Research report, which shows that many times the four largest individual health insurance companies in the state received exactly the rate increase it requested.
In Connecticut Anthem requested a rate increase of more than 30 percent last summer. But after public outcry and a rare state Insurance Department public hearing, Anthem was granted rate increases between 13 and 20 percent, not the 22 to 32 percent rate increases it had requested.
“Individuals and businesses are forced to accept these outrageous increases in insurance premiums, because they have no real power to change the outcome; no voice in the process; no real, open market. That must change,” Lembo said.
This summer after Lembo and Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced they would be introducing legislation to open up the rate setting process, Insurance Commissioner Thomas Sullivan said he doesn’t like increasing rates either and would be happy to hold more public hearings on health insurance rate filings, “as long as the legislature gives the Insurance Department the resources it needs.”
Lembo said that shouldn’t be a problem since the Insurance Department’s budget is paid for by the industry and doesn’t come from the states general fund, which is in the red by about $500 million.
Lembo encouraged the public to come out to the public hearing on the bill and voice their support in favor of greater transparency in the rate setting process.
The public hearing on the bill will be held 1 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 25.
(4) Comments
posted by: JAM | February 19, 2010 10:56am
This is twice this week that Ct has made a TOP 5 list with bad news (The first being the report that we rank in the top 5 in unfunded liabilities).
Anybody still wondering why economic growth here is so anemic with no end to it in sight?
posted by: Martha H | February 19, 2010 3:06pm
“While officials in President Barack Obama’s administration seemed poised to use the report to jumpstart its stalled health care reform proposals… “
Which are, in fact, great big gifts to that same insurance industry, as they would force millions more Americans to buy Aetna et al.‘s over-priced, under-regulated, defective products. (Hey—call the AG!)
Wouldn’t surprise me the least if Anthem, fearful that its stock values would tank if the mandated-insurance-bill failed, timed its (rather ridiculous) rate increase request just to give Obama’s pseudo-reforms the push they need to pass…
posted by: CT Jim | February 19, 2010 4:46pm
So you think that Anthem planned for the teabaggers to kill the bill and then raised their rates to get it going again??
Wow!! Thats one heck of a conspiracy theory.
And if the bill fails and anthem keeps the 40% increase are you going to continue to pay 40% increases to fight off the bill??!!!
I know none of this makes sense.
