Lawmakers, Advocates Call On Gov. To Fire Insurance Commish
by Christine Stuart | Oct 25, 2010 9:24pm
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Health Care, State Capitol
A state senator and a group of advocates on Monday called on Gov. M. Jodi Rell to fire Insurance Commissioner Thomas Sullivan for allowing Anthem to increase its rates 47 percent for nearly 6,000 individuals on its Tonik plan.
“It’s unbelievable to me that the Insurance Commissioner doesn’t support having a rate hearing,” state Sen. Edith Prague, D-Columbia, said at a Capitol press conference. “Who is the commissioner defending?”
She said the commissioner should be looking out for the consumers. Advocates from a group called Citizens for Economic Opportunity (C.E.O) said he should stop acting like a “shill” for the insurance industry.
“There’s no doubt in my mind Commissioner Sullivan is not doing the right thing by the people of this state,” Prague said.
She said any increase above 10 percent should merit a public hearing.
“It’s up to 47 percent,” Prague said. “Give me a break!”
In 2009, when Anthem asked for a 32 percent increase for some of its individual plans, the Insurance Department bowed to public pressure and held a public hearing regarding the rate increase. It was subsequently lowered to between 13 and 20 percent.
Rell’s office declined to comment on the matter and referred all inquiries to the Insurance Department.
In a written statement, Sullivan said advocates and lawmakers should not be placing the blame for the rate hike on him or his department.
“Removing me as Insurance Commissioner does nothing to address the inconvenient truth that the federal healthcare reform law has caused premiums to increase due to the federal government’s failure to address the rising costs of medical care while simultaneously increasing the value of benefits carriers are required to provide,” Sullivan wrote. “If CEO needs to blame someone and they want to blame the Connecticut Insurance Department — or me — I’m fine with that. But it doesn’t change the inconvenient truth that I didn’t write this bill, state regulators didn’t write this bill, but Congress wrote this bill.”
A spokeswoman for the Insurance Department said Anthem was forced to increase its rates in its Tonik plan — which appears to be marketed to young people— because the benefits the new federal health care bill requires are so much greater than the benefits it previously offered.
For example, prescription coverage under the Tonik plan had been $500. But new federal regulations require Anthem to increase them to $750,000. The Insurance Department says that the prescription coverage alone increases the plan by 23 percent.
Beverly Brakeman, public policy director for the United Auto Workers and member of the Insurance Department’s Consumer Council, said in September 2009 after the rate hearings that the department seemed willing to consider legislation that would require hearings. But the department ended up opposing the legislation, saying the language was too subjective.
But to add insult to injury, Brakeman said the federal government even gave the Insurance Department a $1 million grant to investigate rate requests.
“My question is what are they doing with the $1 million dollars,” Brakeman said. “Why wasn’t the Consumer Council even consulted about these rate hikes?”
Brakeman said the recent rate increase upset her so much that she will be tendering her resignation as a member of the Consumer Council on Wednesday at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Minutes after the press conference Monday, Brakeman learned that meeting had been canceled.
Advocates including Brakeman find it hard to believe the 47 percent increase is related solely to the federal health care legislation.
Phil Wheeler, executive director of CEO, said when people read about a 47 percent rate increase in the newspaper they think their insurance is going up by that amount because of health care reform.
“It has nothing to do with it,” Wheeler said. “But this election cycle they basically use it.”
Asked if a hearing might turn into political grandstanding, Brakeman recalled that during the 2009 hearing that people showed up to speak about the impact a 32-percent rate increase.
In similar fashion on Monday, Sarah Darer Littman — a single mother and author — spoke about the increases she saw as a member of an Anthem’s group plan. Click here to read more about Littman’s Anthem experience.
The Insurance Department said it will be holding a hearing on Anthem’s 2011 insurance rates, which will be effective Jan. 1. Those rates have not yet been filed with the Insurance Department.
Tags: Anthem, Insurance, rate increase, Thomas Sullivan, health care reform, health care reform misinformation
(8) Comments
posted by: CT Bill | October 26, 2010 5:53am
I seriously doubt that such a firing would be allowed by Aetna, CIGNA, ConnectiCare and the CBIA.
posted by: and 1 | October 26, 2010 8:35am
This whole story reminds me of something that happened a few years ago when Anthem had to give back money to state employees several years ago.
posted by: JAM | October 26, 2010 8:58am
What impact will these increases have on the state budget? And if the state negotiates a lower premium, what impact will that have on the cost of private plans since that income will be up elsewhere?
posted by: Mansfield1 | October 26, 2010 9:10am
CT bill is absolutely right. That crowd is why we can’t ever experiment with alternative means of supplying health care. Because it’s not about health care!!
It’s about using people’s need for health care as a vehicle to enrich investors by making 25 to 30% on individual plans.
Imagine what health care would cost if the insurance industry got its way and made us all but individual plans.
posted by: hawkeye | October 26, 2010 11:57am
Mansfield1: READ THE MIND-BOGGLING COST OF OBAMA-CARE!
Have you read the mind-boggling cost of Obama-Care, together with the un-American add-on provisions, which penalize both business, and individually insured?
ObsmaCare is Socialism, at its best!
posted by: belltor | October 26, 2010 1:59pm
I guess the Rell administartion only wants to protect us from the big bad state employee unions.
The big bad corporations
are given free reign by republican politicians to
exploit us at every turn.
when will the people ever learn.
posted by: saramerica | October 26, 2010 10:53pm
Hawkeye, as I testified at the hearing, the individually insured were being penalized by these insurance company before Obama even was elected a senator, much less President. So please stop boring us with the GOP talking point rants.
posted by: CitizenCT | October 27, 2010 8:36pm
It’s easy to blame the insurance companies. However it comes down to the cost of delivering healthcare and the coverage offered. Obamacare did nothing to manage health care costs while mandating coverage. It did nothing to increase competition to companies like Anthem so consumers had more choice. If you’re not happy, blame Larson, Murphy, Pelosi, Reid and Obama, they deserve it. Shooting the messenger gets you no where.