Lawmakers Hear About Immigrants ‘Dreams’
by Christine Stuart | Mar 15, 2011 12:20pm
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Education, Labor, State Capitol
(Updated) Equity and justice were just two reasons Sen. Majority Leader Martin Looney believes that momentum is building for legislation that allows undocumented students pay the same college tuition rates as other Connecticut residents.
“Nothing is more truly American than the dream that these young people are pursing,“ Looney said.
Proponents like Looney argue these undocumented students shouldn’t be punished for what their parents did.
“In many cases these children have no memory of the countries they lived in prior to coming to the United States,” he said.
He said giving these students the in-state tuition rates probably means they will still have to struggle and work to go to school, but at least college tuition will be reasonable and not out of reach.
This is not a ticket to a free ride that will burden taxpayers, Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman said Tuesday at a press conference. She said it’s actually the opposite, it recognizes the reality of these students and the economic reality the state is dealing with, which is why Gov. Dannel P. Malloy has pitched it as one of his budget proposals this year.
“If job creation is our agenda the why on earth would we want to slam the door on bright young students that are future taxpayers,” Wyman wondered.
Lorella Praeli, a 22-year-old originally from Peru, who came “out of the shadows” last year after she was told to wait.
When the U.S. Senate vote on the relief for undocumented minors fell five votes short, “we were told to wait to put our dreams on hold,” she said. “Ladies and gentlemen our dreams are too important, too valuable to put on hold.”
She asked lawmakers to ignore the “empty arguments” of those that say “we are not deserving,” or who argue “we’d be taking up spots of Connecticut residents.”
“We are residents of the state of Connecticut,” Praeli said explaining that many have gone to school in the state for many years, some like her sister, since kindergarten.
“We can not change federal immigration policy, but we can do something right here in our state by making some of these dreams a reality,” she said.
Praeli has said she was lucky enough to land a full ride to Quinnipiac University through a private scholarship. Otherwise, she would have had to pay three times the rate of in-state tuition at an in-state college or university.
But her arguments and those of New Haven lawmakers and the governor may not be heard by everyone.
Rep. Juan Candelaria, D-New Haven, a passionate advocate for the bill said “it’s more than a social issue it’s a moral issue.”
However, Rep. Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, said the state would be educating a workforce employers won’t be able to hire in Connecticut. He also said there’s likely to be a legal challenge to the legislation, if it’s passed.
Katie Chamblee, a Yale Law School student, said California has passed similar language and it withstood a Supreme Court challenge in that state last year. She said she’s confident the courts in Connecticut would reject any challenge of the law. She said it’s clearly in compliance with federal law, which allows states to make its own laws.
Candelora said he understands there’s no prohibition but it exposes the state.
Rep. Pamela Sawyer, R-Bolton, said last week that the measure would be unfair to the state’s legal residents.
Connecticut has worked hard to build its public higher education institutes into some of the best in the country, she said. As a result, admissions at state’s universities and colleges have already become highly competitive, she said.
She used the University of Connecticut as an example. The school has 23,000 applicants for 3,000 freshmen slots, she said. Of those slots, 1,000 go to out-of-state students, who pay more and bring in money to the school, while the other 2,000 go to in-state students, she said.
“So all those kids that want to come to UConn from this state have a heck of a lot of competition amongst the kids who are naturally born and here with full legal status. That’s competition with a big ‘C,’” she said. “How do I say to those student and parents, ‘oh by the way, we’re going to take those seats away from you and give them to undocumented kids?’”
According to Werner Oyanadel acting director of the Latino and Puerto Rican Affairs Commission, UConn until recently didn’t accept undocumented students. He said communications with the university liasion found the university currently has two undocumented students paying out-of-state tuition rates.
Wyman said she would make sure UConn accepts undocumented students if this legislation passes.
Public testimony on the legislation was mostly in favor of it, however, there were also opponents like Lynn Gold.
Lynn Gold, said passing this legislation would open up a Pandora’s box.
“If a person is an illegal alien that person is a felon,” Gold said.
“I take great umberage with you calling them felons,” Rep. Timothy LeGeyt, R-Canton, told Gold. He said many who testified Tuesday are in the position they are in because of something their parents did. It was through no fault of their own.
Tags: in-state tuition, undocumented students
(8) Comments
posted by: Disgruntled | March 15, 2011 1:19pm
Do not cave in to feel-good legislation.
I have to agree with Rep. Sawyer.
Advice to children of illegals—do what I am doing. Borrow,borrow and borrow some more to pay out of state tuition. A good education is not a right but a privilege and some of us have to work harder (myself included) to pursue our dreams.
Push to make education for all legal residents free.Push to make the process of legal status smoother and stop trying to make everything seem “fair” because life is not fair! Make that your mantra and you will go far. Life is not fair.
posted by: BMS | March 15, 2011 1:48pm
Will the undocumented students be allowed to sell pot on campus on Sunday?
posted by: redlady | March 15, 2011 10:52pm
What a disappointment in our State Representatives! The proponents of this bill are a disgrace in their total disrespect of legal constituents who placed them in office and pay their wages and benefits. Looney & Prague stated that these students are the best and the brightest, will generate job creation, will live up to their promises to pursue citizenship, will not cause CT citizens to be denied admission due to lack of space created by overcrowding, blah,blah. The crowd they were addressing today required translators in order to understand the English-spoken testimony. Can anyone spell l-u-d-i-c-r-o-u-s?
posted by: William Jenkins | March 16, 2011 12:58am
Actually Christine, it was proposed by Sen. Williams, Rep. Donovan, Rep. Sharkey and Sen. Looney.
The Executive Branch cannot propose bills, only legislators can do that.
It may have the words “Governor’s Bill” on the top of it but it had to be agreed to by the four legislators who signed the original bill before it was submitted to the House Clerk’s office then forwarded to the Higher Ed. committee.
The Governor cannot do that on his own any more than you or I can propose legislation.
posted by: Matt W. | March 16, 2011 11:30am
I have a dream for my kids: That they won’t be punished for their parents failure in allowing the state to rack up prosperity crushing debt. That they will be able to pay off this debt while paying for school in competition with those undocumented students who are not so burdened b/c theit tax burden is voluntary.
Unfortunately, it’s just a dream.
posted by: Christine Stuart | March 16, 2011 7:10pm
Thanks for the comment William. I do understand that the governor cannot introduce legislation, but I can’t explain all of that succinctly in one sentence. If you feel I’m over generalizing I apologize. I agree legislative leaders were asked to sign off on the legislation, which was technically handed to them by the governor’s office. Speaker Donovan said it was the most awkward thing he’s had to do since the new governor took office.