Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

3rd Annual Connecticut-Israel Technology Summit Set for June 12
May 17, 2013 3:03 pm
The MetroHartford Alliance and the Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford have announced the third annual...more »
CTNext Launches Startup Map
May 5, 2013 12:29 pm
CTNext, a public/private partnership helping the high tech startup community in the state, launched an interactive map...more »
Jepsen Seeks Information on LivingSocial Security Breach
May 2, 2013 11:58 am
Attorney General George Jepsen is seeking information on a security breach at daily deal site LivingSocial that...more »

Tag List

Lawmakers Join Resignation Chorus

by Christine Stuart | Oct 11, 2012 4:34pm
(1) Comment | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Education

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Google

Christine Stuart photo The Democratic co-chairs and Republican ranking members of the legislature’s Higher Education and Employment Advance Committee told the chairman and vice chairman of the Board of Regents that they believe President Robert Kennedy should resign his position.

Sen. Beth Bye, co-chairwoman of the Higher Education and Employment Committee, said the reform agenda they’ve worked hard to implement has been overshadowed by Kennedy’s decision to give 22 staffers more than $260,000 in raises. One of the employees has decided to forego his raise, while the rest were suspended by Kennedy Wednesday.

“We don’t see how with the damage that’s been done in this case that that reform agenda can be carried through,” Bye said. “At this point, it’s damaging to the students if that system doesn’t move forward.”

Sen. Toni Boucher, R-Wilton, said they are calling for Kennedy’s resignation and a statement of no confidence because there is a statute and law in place that says these wage increases should have been brought before the 15 member Board of Regents for approval.

She said there seems to be an overall failure of communication between the president and the Board of Regents.

Bye said the Board of Regents are going to create an ad hoc committee as soon as next week to look into what they have to do to “legally” get rid of Kennedy.

The committee will be appointed this week and the board will address it at its Oct. 18 meeting.

The board is also expected to address the raises which were suspended by Kennedy Thursday and the issues regarding the turmoil between the central administration and the community college presidents who felt pressured to leave their jobs.

The lawmakers join Republican legislative leadership in calling on Kennedy to resign.

Boucher said she would expect someone with such a long history in academic leadership to know to run these types of decisions past his board first.

Kennedy was president of the University of Maine before being appointed by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy as president of the Board of Regents last year.

“I was incredulous that these decisions were made and handled in the manner they were by someone who is an experienced person in higher education,” Rep. Roberta Willis said at the hastily called press conference.

It’s unclear exactly how the Board of Regents will handle the situation, but Lewis Robinson, its chairman put out a statement earlier in the day indicating swift action will be taken.

“The Board, and I, personally, have been greatly troubled with the actions that have been taken by and the lack of information shared with the Board of Regents by President Kennedy,” Robinson said Thursday. “As I said yesterday, the board will be reviewing his judgment exercised in these matters, as well as his performance. Based on our findings, we will take the appropriate action.”

Aside from the raises the Board of Regents is being asked by lawmakers to look into the compensation package for the president, who receives a base salary of $340,000 and six weeks of “professional development,” which Kennedy interpreted a little differently than most.

Kennedy said his six weeks were spent at his second home in Minnesota where he was “working remotely,” when a majority of the raises were doled out.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

Comment

posted by: Murrow fan | October 11, 2012  11:21pm

Why is Bye only concerned about ‘ill-timed’ (!) raises and not the buyout?  Why is President Glickman a target?  What connection does President Glickman have to Bye….CREC.  Reporters need to look into how President Glickman seems to have got on Bye’s and Meotti’s bad side. Hint: it has everything to do with Dr. Glickman being an excellent manager and CREC not being even an adequate manager. Connect the dots…...$$$  It also has to do with Dr. Glickman refusing to be a doormat for Meotti and Bye.