Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

Categories

CT Tech Junkie Feed

CTTechJunkie Appears on Fox61’s The Real Story
Jun 17, 2013 8:32 am
CTTechJunkie writer Lon Seidman appeared on Fox61’s The Real Story on Sunday, June 17.  Watch the appearance here:

...

more »
Analysis | What Does the NSA Surveillance Program Mean For You?
Jun 15, 2013 2:35 pm
Yale constitutional law scholar Anjali Dalal suggests that when it comes to grilling the National Security Agency on...more »
Game Console Wars Heat Up at E3 2013
Jun 11, 2013 11:02 am
The annual E3 video gaming conference is underway in Los Angeles, and the big console makers are showing off new...more »

Tag List

Malloy Folds On People’s Center

by Hugh McQuaid | Jun 4, 2012 12:24pm Google
(9) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Town News, New Haven, State Budget

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Christine Stuart photo

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy

(Updated 1:15 p.m.)Citing veterans’ concerns over the New Haven People’s Center’s communist ties, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy pulled funding for renovations to the building from Monday’s Bond Commission agenda.

“I have to say, I’ve thought a lot about this project over the last few weeks. Enough questions have been raised and clearly we do not have a consensus on this particular issue. I’m particularly concerned about the opposition of veterans groups. Therefore I have decided we should not go forward with this project,” Malloy said during the meeting.

Monday was the second time the project has been stricken from a the Bond Commission’s agenda. In April a woman from Wethersfield emailed the Bond Commission to let them know two board members of Progressive Education and Research Associates, the nonprofit organization which runs the New Haven People’s Center, are members of the Communist Party USA.

But proponents of the project and members of Malloy’s administration defended the project during a press conference at the end of May.

Sen. Toni Harp, D-New Haven, who requested the $300,000 project said the money will go to repair what was a part of New Haven’s landscape long before it became the New Haven Peoples Center. She said the 160-year-old building has architectural and historical significance for the state.

Paul Bass File Photo On Friday Vietnam vets and motorcycle club members protested the state funding outside the community center.

Malloy said the veteran opposition was enough to give him pause.

“This clearly has become an emotional issue,” he said at a press conference following the Bond Commission meeting.

“I’m concerned about the amount of controversy this has caused, particularly with respect to those individuals who have served this nation in the armed services,” he said. “... Because of the amount of opposition and hurt that this has engendered, I thought it was appropriate to move on.”

Malloy permanently removed the funding from Monday’s agenda and encouraged the group to seek other means to fund the renovations.

Harp said she was disappointed in the governor’s decision and thought many people in her district will be disappointed as well. She said she didn’t know of Malloy’s plans to pull the project.

“I certainly would have appreciated some notice but I didn’t get it,” she said in a phone interview.

Harp said she thinks the people who run the community center will find a way to regroup and save the building.

The Bond Commission’s two Republican members, Sen. Andrew Roraback and Rep. Sean Williams, have criticized the project since it first appeared on the agenda in April. Last week they held a press conference pointing to a newspaper with a Marxist editorial mission, which has its regional offices in the building.

Roraback and Williams praised the governor’s decision. Roraback said the notion that the state was poised to invest $300,000 in an organization clearly political in nature was “outrageous.”

“I’m pleased that veterans were able to change the governor’s mind. It does beg the question how this item ever appeared on the agenda in the first place,” he said. “I think the more the public learned about where their taxpayer dollars were going, the greater the anger.”

Williams said the fact that the money even ended up on the Bond Commission’s agenda was evidence the state needs to do a better job scrutinizing all projects it decides to fund.

“It was an item that had very little detail, something that was sort of out of the blue and I think it was an appropriate decision on [Malloy’s] part to drop it,” he said.

However, the decision was a switch for the administration, which as late as Thursday defended the project. Malloy’s Senior Adviser Roy Occhiogrosso said last week that pulling the project would start the state down a dangerous path.

Occhiogrosso said examining the past or present political leanings of every organization the state gives money to raises civil liberty and First Amendment concerns. He criticized Republicans for playing politics with the project.

“It’s pretty clear they’re trying to score political points but they’re using a playbook from 1955 and they’re not gaining much traction,” he said.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

(9) Comments

posted by: sightover | June 4, 2012  1:14pm

Our free society has plenty of room for every political persuasion, but taxpayers needn’t fund them all. Had this been a Klan HQ or Nazi party community center it never would’ve appeared on the bonding agenda. That communists claim title to the “people” is of no consequence: all of the aforementioned ideologies claim the same while they consume humanity and destroy freedom of choice. Whether you pit races or the 99% and 1% against each other, you’re still relying on hatred and greed to debase your foe. Communism isn’t dangerous for what it has done in the past, it is dangerous because of what it means for the future. It is a belief in destroying individual economic and political freedom so that a select few can direct us to utopia; it always ends with equality in squalor and servitude. Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, the Kims, etc., etc. didn’t corrupt Marx’s vision - it corrupted them.

posted by: Palin Smith | June 4, 2012  3:25pm

Payback is a bitch!

posted by: Lawrence | June 4, 2012  8:21pm

I believe Al Marder received a Bronze Star—the fourth highest combat award in the military— while serving in the Army in Europe in World War II.

posted by: William Kurtz | June 5, 2012  9:09am

“That communists claim title to the “people” is of no consequence: all of the aforementioned ideologies claim the same while they consume humanity and destroy freedom of choice. “

You could just as easily apply that standard to the contemporary Republican party.

posted by: ASTANVET | June 5, 2012  9:23am

I think the point that is missed on a lot of the commentary is that this building is privately owned.  Why is State Bond money considered for a rennovation?  I got it, it’s old, but we in the north east have a lot of old homes and buildings, state bonding isn’t used on those… the fact that they are communists is just a distraction, but I’m glad the Governor decided to let it go!

posted by: jenand | June 5, 2012  12:04pm

Sounds like someone didn’t do their homework, nor did they build the foundation needed to acheive their goal i.e. $$$ for the project. I find the expectation of this project being bonded, was (stated kindly) quite naiive.

posted by: Dob | June 5, 2012  12:19pm

I am a 100% service-connected disabled Vietnam vet.  The Waterbury “Freedom Force” and other right-wing “super patriots” do not speak for me, or for any of the other vets that I know.  In giving in to the most outrageous red-baiting from these few, the Governor is pandering to our lowest selves. The groups that use the People’s Center do vital work in a poor community, and have for decades, all as volunteers.  Al Marder has devoted his life to civil rights and social justice. He is the true patriot in this story. This is a sad day, and a real wimp-out to the rabid right for our Governor. We should all be ashamed.

posted by: gutbomb86 | June 5, 2012  4:10pm

gutbomb86

Totally agree with Dob and Lawrence. The basis for the objections to bonding for the renovation was red-scare garbage. I certainly think the point can be made that perhaps some of the money should be raised privately or maybe adding to our debt isn’t prudent etc - there’s room for argument there. But by and large, that was not the tenor or topic of the argument. It was anti-communist nonsense. Red-baiting. Pathetic.

posted by: ASTANVET | June 6, 2012  11:23am

Well, honestly if you want to have the political discussion, there should be a lot of fear about creeping communism, socialism… it has failed every place it has been put in place, and has worked out well for the ruling class, but not the socialist workers… but this isn’t about political, or economic theories…it is about using the public trust to renovate a private building… I don’t go to the State bonding commission to put new gutters on my house…  they could fund raise, they could seek donations, they could have events that pay (capitalism…ooohhh) But this isn’t about them being “commies”...it is about privatizing the gains, socializing the costs…