Malloy Rescinds $170M, Safety Net Impacted
by Christine Stuart and Hugh McQuaid | Nov 28, 2012 5:37pm
(12) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: State Budget, Taxes
Hugh McQuaid Photo
Ben Barnes and Roy Occhiogrosso
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy used his rescission authority Wednesday to cut $170 million from the state budget, which is estimated to end the year with a $365 million deficit. But his rescissions only lowered the deficit to $240 million because some of the cuts already were assumed.
Malloy has the authority to rescind up to 5 percent of any line item and 3 percent of any fund without seeking legislative approval. He will need the General Assembly, which already has agreed to rescind $3 million, to close the gap.
The social safety net will be impacted by the cuts. More than $82 million come from agencies that administer social services. The Department of Social Services is taking a $32 million cut and the Developmental Services Department will be cut by $21 million. The Department of Children and Families will be asked to reduce spending by $18 million.
Other social services departments will have their budgets reduced as well. The Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services’ budget will be reduced by $7.7 million, the Public Health Department by $2 million.
The Veterans Affairs Department budget also will be reduced by $177,000, of which $17,500 had been budgeted for veterans’ headstones.
Budget Director Ben Barnes said the agencies administering social services programs will have to work hard to make sure the cuts don’t harm the state’s most vulnerable populations.
“It will only be because of the success and hard work of the commissioners in finding ways to find efficiencies in these programs,” Barnes said.
Roy Occhiogrosso, Malloy’s senior communications adviser, said he didn’t think those populations would be harmed, but rather that they will “feel the impact in a way that makes none of us happy.”
There also were rescissions not based upon cuts, but instead upon new estimates of how much the state will save in various areas, according to Barnes.
The state expects to save $28 million in the state employee health services account by spending less on health services because of changes implemented under the state employee concession agreement reach in 2011.
“We just think the costs are running lower so we were able to rescind those dollars from that account,” Barnes said.
About $41 million of the $161.6 million in executive branch cuts fell into this category, Barnes said.
“There were already some dollars on this list we had identified we would be able to live without,” he said.
The rescissions made Wednesday ran the gamut from social services to higher education to arts funding.
AIDS services were cut $248,000, while arts organizations like the Bushnell Theater will receive $10,000 less in funding. Education services such as grants to priority school districts also were cut $1 million and magnet schools were cut $2 million. Early childhood education was for the most part spared, Barnes said.
The state’s higher education system will see its funding reduced by almost $26 million. The University of Connecticut’s block grants are being reduced by $10 million.
Barnes said he hoped that wouldn’t lead the school to raise its tuition. Last year, UConn’s Board of Trustees voted to raise student tuition by around 6 percent a year over four years.
“I believe that all the units of higher education can find ways to adjust their operations to accommodate these cuts,” Barnes said.
Occhiogrosso said to look at any one of the cuts in isolation misses the larger point, which “is that this governor inherited an enormous mess. It took 20 years to dig that hole. It’s going to take more than 20 months for us to dig out of it.”
“Nobody likes cutting services, but when you take a tax increase off the table you have limited options to act unilaterally,” he added.
Republican lawmakers agreed that no one likes cutting services but said these rescissions wouldn’t have been necessary if Malloy had crafted an honest budget in the first place.
“The budget from two years ago had massive problems and now we’re starting to see those problems,” Sen. Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said outside the state Capitol.
Fasano said the state should never have raised spending while in the midst of an economic recession.
“Those are the types of things you can’t do but he gambled. Gov. Malloy said ‘this is the way to do it. Here’s the largest tax increase in Connecticut’s history, we’ll spend another billion dollars more of money, and you know what it’s going to be fine we’re going to work it out.’ But we saw what is happening now,” Fasano said.
Occhiogrosso said Republicans are wrong to blame the deficit on Malloy’s budget. States across the country are dealing with budgetary problems based on lagging revenue and higher-than-expected expenditures through Medicaid, he said. Earlier Wednesday, Occhiogrosso emailed reporters a Boston Globe story regarding Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick’s efforts to deal with similar problems.
“It’s happening in neighboring states, it’s happening in states across the country, states with Republican governors, states with Democratic governors. That is an incorrect analysis,” he said of Republicans’ criticisms.
Regardless of what necessitated them, Fasano said Malloy’s rescissions were a start in addressing the budget. He suggested people look to the budget Republicans proposed two years ago for ideas on where to trim state government. So far, Senate Republicans have not been contacted for ideas, he said. They’re planning to meet with the governor’s office in early December, he said.
“I just hope that this process is not like it was two years ago. I hope he does open the door. I hope Republicans are invited to the room. We may agree to disagree, but we need to have that conversation. I think the people of Connecticut deserve that conversation,” Fasano said.
Tags: budget rescissions, cuts, spending, safety net, taxes, Roy Occhiogrosso, Ben Barnes, dh
(12) Comments
posted by: JamesBronsdon | November 28, 2012 6:19pm
Interesting study from Conning here in Hartford. “State of the States” Oct. 2012. Available on request. Connecticut ranks dead last on their list of states’ creditworthiness. See in particular the section entitled “Connecticut - What Has Happened?” Apparently, we sold Gen’l Obligation bonds in September based on fairly decent credit agency ratings. That won’t be happening again any time soon. Not going to effect any savings with refinancing our current debt. Bit of a pickle the Governor has gotten us into to.
posted by: Reasonable | November 28, 2012 8:54pm
Gov. Malloy only scratched the tip of the iceberg. HE MUST NOW MAKE SOME SERIOUS BUDGET CUTS.
posted by: Hoosier@CT | November 29, 2012 8:20am
Ummmm interesting Mr. Occhiogrosso said it was wrong to blame the deficit on Malloy….who was it that shoved the New Britain bus through? Who was it that is pushing for the rail service? Who was it that keeps giving away state tax dollars to businesses? Who was it that pushed for the “Earned Income Tax Credit”? When Malloy sees a big piggy bank (huge state tax / fees increase) he figures out how to empty it before he actually pays the bills. Kind of brings to mind the children’s story “If you give a mouse a cookie”, the more revenue the state brings in (our tax dollars) the more the state figures out how to spend it and comes back for more. In this case instead of cutting back on his frivolous spending, he is cutting back on agencies that have state & federal mandates to serve the communities, but they have to do it with less. Well if these agencies can do it with less, so should he.
posted by: DrHunterSThompson | November 29, 2012 8:46am
The real problem is lack of leadership. It seems that politics is a shell game laced with extreme partisanship and special and personal interest. I’m not sure any of these jokers could make it in a profit/loss atmosphere.
The financial crises we are in has been coming (and has been here) for 5 or 6 years. The politicians have continued to increase spending every budget, incredibly including the last. No one should be surprised at any of this.
Colorado and Washington state are looking good, eh?
HST
posted by: robn | November 29, 2012 11:10am
CT, like other blue states, receives $1.00 for every $1.75 paid in federal taxes, while moocher red states receive many more dollars than they pay in. This has been going on for the past 20 years and is the basis for Republican Grover Norquist’s illusion called the “No Tax Increase Pledge”. Sure Republicans in other parts of the country haven’t raised taxes on their constituants; thats easy when you put a huge cash siphon on blue states. Its time our congressional delegations evened the score and rediverted federal dollars from moocher red states back to blue states that pay them.
posted by: Reasonable | November 29, 2012 2:36pm
DrHunterSThompson: This is probably the first time that you indicated that “the Democratic leadership has not been politically correct.” You got what you voted for HST.
posted by: JamesBronsdon | November 29, 2012 3:56pm
Please provide source, robn, as I’m somewhat skeptical but open to enlightenment.
posted by: robn | November 29, 2012 11:53pm
http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/ftsbs-timeseries-20071016.xls
posted by: DirtyJobsGUy | November 30, 2012 9:16am
robn,
The “moocher” red states tend to have things like large military bases based on large amounts of open land for shooting stuff off. If you think we could get part of Ft. Sill’s artillery training moved to Green CT you’re welcome to try. Also CT pays a lot of income taxes from the much reviled 1% hedgies and finance guys in Stamford and Greenwich. Now that we are chasing them to Florida or the Caymans the ratio may self correct until the feds can’t print any more money
posted by: JamesBronsdon | November 30, 2012 1:25pm
An excel spreadsheet - fun - if I had a week or two to do the analysis your comment suggests, robn. Pages 9 and 12 of this U.S. census study seems to suggest the blue states aren’t nearly as hosed as you might suggest, robn. http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/fas-10.pdf
posted by: robn | November 30, 2012 4:48pm
FRED and DJG,
Line item program spending doesn’t matter; what matters is how many tax dollars are paid to the federal government and how many dollars come back. CT is, very simply put, a donor state.
posted by: JamesBronsdon | November 30, 2012 11:00pm
Well, OK, robn. I don’t know if you’re right or not about CT, but what’s your point? If there are 50 states, inevitably some send more to the federal gov’t vis-a-vis their inflow than others. So what? Are you suggesting there’s some Republican hegemony that’s stealing from us? That would seem unlikely given the relatively 50/50 split in presidencies over the last 70 years or so, and the largely Democrat-controlled Congress over a majority of those years. And if we get these federal dollars back, how does that benefit us? Dependency on any level of government can only lead to bad things.